[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 80 KB, 1000x1000, ctkr,x2200,front,black-c,250,163,1000,1000-bg,f8f8f8.u5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12552240 No.12552240 [Reply] [Original]

Can somebody please help me? Reading the book is like trying to read in a foreign language.Can someone please spoonfeed me the things he talks about? What is the spirit and how is it's existance proved?

>> No.12552244
File: 20 KB, 612x612, 1547776543215.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12552244

>>12552240
>existance

>> No.12552255

>>12552244
Rip thread

>> No.12552260

>>12552240
first you have substance, then substance is said to be contradictory because its static so you get movement, but movement is only in the mind so movement in itself is wrong, but movement in the spirit is wrong too since it is outside the spirit, but since the spirit has to be involved and it cant grasp infinity then movement is an abstract concept, but an abstract concept isnt mobile so then it follows that movement is the activity of the spirit when dealing with abstractions referring to the material world

but movement IS the world and the spirit is movement, the spirit is the world

t. wikipedia scam artist

>> No.12552262
File: 709 KB, 810x931, fanged gf.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12552262

>>12552240
Skip to the Ding an sich

>> No.12552268

>>12552260
How is substance static?

>> No.12552271
File: 250 KB, 1100x1380, 1531374957936.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12552271

>>12552244
>>12552255

>> No.12552278

>>12552271
Come on bro please help a brainlet out here.

>> No.12552287

>>12552260
Also, how can you just claim that "first you have substance".

>> No.12552288

>>12552268
hegel always starts with the thing in itself as a starting point to reach his conclusions, or "pure being"

he thinks this is and empty "static" concept

>> No.12552310

>>12552288
How can dealing with things as pure metaphysical objects hold any merit in a world where we only deal with and influence material objects? Sounds like just playing with empty air to me.

>> No.12552331

Have you read the Logic? It facilitates the comprehension of the Phenomenology tremendously. Or at least it did to me.

>> No.12552356

>>12552331
I can try, but I doubt I will get it. It feels like there is a wall between me and hegel. I just can't comprehend him.

>> No.12552394

>>12552356
If you want to take a look at a very short book called The rational kernel of the hegelian dialectic. The book itself is from a marxist perspective but it has an extremely good and succint presentation of Hegel's philosophy

>> No.12552404

>>12552240
>>12552262
she cute

>> No.12553730

>>12552404
Wrong. She's black.

>> No.12554932

Number one tip from when I stuided him in university, never start directly with Hegel when considering and of his books, always read an overview of it first. His terminology can be extremely difficult, and it is very easy to slip into a particular interpretation.

>> No.12554939

any of*

>> No.12555006
File: 225 KB, 600x600, 1545135080473.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12555006

>>12552244

>> No.12555079

>>12552240
people here don't even get zizek, why do you think they could tell you anything about the parent who they also have not read?

>> No.12555112
File: 660 KB, 1036x1036, 1510449811387.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12555112

>>12552244