/lit/ - Literature

gtfo faggot

>>12532615
Hellenic men were notorious snakes. They segregated themselves from women, which resulted in ever widening differences and animosities. It was as if they were different tribes. The fool projected his bad experiences with some woman or two with the whole sex. Men have been doing it ever since the Bronze Age wound into the Iron Age, and it only got worse with literacy.
The ice between us has only recently started to crack since the Revolutionary age started. Hopefully something nice is coming.

>>12532812
Pretty true. Even Plato thought there should be more equal treatment between the sexes, and less separation

>>12532615
Age old wisdom from the Greeks

>>12532615
GOAT
BASED
AND
REDPILLED

>>12532812
Yeah no woman has ever done that LMFAO

>>12532812
>Hopefully something nice is coming.
the sexes loathe each other right now and arent even reproducing

>>12533093
No women have established a matriarchy?
Nothing very significant in recent centuries, no.

>>12533094
The environment calamity coming is going to chew us up, so where there are modern women, less of them are interested in breeding like rabbits. Socialism in the home has given us some patchy results. It's only a small start and the reactionary is as irrational as ever about it.

>>12532615
based hesiod

>>12533169
Jesus christ you're fucking stupid.

>>12532812
Based literacy made us sexists conspiracy theorist. There's like a whole subreddit dedicated to this shit.

>>12532812

>thousands of philosophers throughout the ages disagreed on nearly every topic imaginable, from metaphysics to dialectics to deonthology and politics
>yet almost all of them considered women to be worthless subhumans
What does it mean?

>>12533534
That you fell for the memes and haven't actually read them?

A big part of "coaxing, cozening and deceiving" is to swear you are doing no such thing; moreover, that the other party is, in fact, doing it. Hence >>12532812

dongs

>>12533541
Name 3 philosophers who respected whamen (and weren't whamen themselves)

>>12532615
Boeotian """People"""

>>12533567
Literally no need.

>>12532930
>Even Plato thought there should be more equal treatment between the sexes
no he didnt, he thought that when they were educated, they should be taught the same things. thats all

>>12532615
>Do not let a flaunting woman coax and cozen and deceive you
>flaunting woman
>flaunting

This is a reminder that 'swivel-hipped' is a much better translation of the word πυγοστόλος.

Be careful out there.

>>12532615
He meant that >>12532812 will always exist

>>12533628
Not a philosopher

>>12532812
That smell, that smelly smell. Its roasties

>>12532615
Almost based but women aren't deceivers, they wear their atrocious nature on their sleeves.
It's the「Demon」 between man's legs that deceives him into thinking otherwise.

>>12535317
>Deceit-by-omission isn't deception
lol okay, try not filing with the tax authority in your country of citizenship and then get back to me

"No one is more arrogant toward women, more aggressive or scornful, than the man who is anxious about his virility.”

What did she mean by this?

>>12535317
Based chasteanon

>>12533567
Literally all of them except for when they made some off quote because some women rejected them.

>>12532812
Holy shit /lit/ really is just an online liberal arts department

>>12535058
Doesn't that word just mean "prepared ass?" Thus, it would be more about the decorations attracting towards the ass than the movement of the ass itself. Regardless if I'm right or wrong, "swivel-hipped" is much better than "flaunting."

>>12535364
Yup. That's the way we like it around here

How come almost all intellectual figures in history were redpilled on the Women Question?

It's only after the dawn of modernity that we start to hear absurdities like "women are cool" or "women and men are the same" being spouted unironically

>>12535401
they were not afraid to espouse the truth because there was no system of subversion in place to regulate their thought
i think you know where i'm going with this

>>12532812
>Hopefully something nice is coming.

It's certainly not you.

>>12532615

>For they say that 'the Savior himself said: I came to destroy the works of the female'.