/lit/ - Literature

>>12290993
What? Phrenology?

>>>/pol/

fuck off

>>12290993
Start with Mein Kampf

why does he look the same as that toddler?

You're better of looking at the primary literature for this sort of thing:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289604000777

You'll find just as many schlubs who are neo-nazis or communists or libertarians.

>>12290993
Living in your head rent free

>>12290993
You look like a fucking moron wearing glasses with a t shirt.

There doesn't seem to be any correlation.

>>12290993
Not really. There are some publications on how weightlifting causes one to adopt political views that are more aligned with self-interest (which usually means right wing views, though not always so), but i dont think someone has written books on it. But now that i think of it, maybe Nietzschean ressentiment might be a good place to start.

>>12290993
You mean like incels and neo-nazism?

>>12291068
God his mocking him

>>12291023
>Phrenology
Thank you, I was looking for that term.
Yes, something like that, but also related to the whole body and the way someone is raised. So not necessarily just genetics, but a holistic view of body-mind relations, even from a sociological perspective.

>>12291069
>>12291078
Also good, thanks.

>>12291081
Most incels aren't even white, and many on the left are just incels in denial. They'll say shit like "yeah i'm a 25 year old virgin but i totally dont hate women like those hateful incels though, haha".

https://osf.io/zn79k/

We show that faces contain much more information about sexual orientation than can be perceived and interpreted by the human brain. We used deep neural networks to extract features from 35,326 facial images. These features were entered into a logistic regression aimed at classifying sexual orientation. Given a single facial image, a classifier could correctly distinguish between gay and heterosexual men in 81% of cases, and in 74% of cases for women. Human judges achieved much lower accuracy: 61% for men and 54% for women. The accuracy of the algorithm increased to 91% and 83%, respectively, given five facial images per person. Facial features employed by the classifier included both fixed (e.g., nose shape) and transient facial features (e.g., grooming style). Consistent with the prenatal hormone theory of sexual orientation, gay men and women tended to have gender-atypical facial morphology, expression, and grooming styles. Prediction models aimed at gender alone allowed for detecting gay males with 57% accuracy and gay females with 58% accuracy. Those findings advance our understanding of the origins of sexual orientation and the limits of human perception. Additionally, given that companies and governments are increasingly using computer vision algorithms to detect people’s intimate traits, our findings expose a threat to the privacy and safety of gay men and women.

>>12290993
Based Matt Christman

>>12290993
Can we just wash our hands of this topic please. The whole thing is disgusting.
Or
The world would be a better place if we all took probiotics and let our kids eat dirt.

>mfw scientific lit is like being forcefed a thousand writing prompts a second.

>>12291103
/pol/ isn't full of attractive men with families.

>>12291119
That has nothing to do with what i said.

>>12290993
You find a lot of sub-human filth with strong ideologies.

You should never consider anyone’s opinion without first inspecting their physical state.

Are they at maximum 18 percent body fat? Do they dress appropriately for different social situations? Is their posture acceptable? What odour do they omit?

These are simple barriers that any worth while human should have to get through before you even consider letting them change your opinion on anything.

Facial characteristics are an important basis for judgements about gender, emotion, personality, motivational states and behavioural dispositions. Based on a recent finding of a sexual dimorphism in facial metrics that is independent of body size, we conducted three studies to examine the extent to which individual differences in the facial width-to-height ratio were associated with trait dominance (using a questionnaire) and aggression during a behavioural task and in a naturalistic setting (varsity and professional ice hockey). In study 1, men had a larger facial width-to-height ratio, higher scores of trait dominance, and were more reactively aggressive compared with women. Individual differences in the facial width-to-height ratio predicted reactive aggression in men, but not in women (predicted 15% of variance). In studies 2 (male varsity hockey players) and 3 (male professional hockey players), individual differences in the facial width-to-height ratio were positively related to aggressive behaviour as measured by the number of penalty minutes per game obtained over a season (predicted 29 and 9% of the variance, respectively). Together, these findings suggest that the sexually dimorphic facial width-to-height ratio may be an ‘honest signal’ of propensity for aggressive behaviour.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2570531/

>>12291056
Absolutely based and highly rouge pilled

>>12291123
As long as you don't disagree with that.

>ideology determines how you look

Do people here actually believe this?

>>12291104
why are the heteros so fat, though?
fucking americans, can't even provide normal humans for research.

>>12291154
Probably because they have less pressure to find a partner, since they may be married.

>>12291068
all four men visible in that picture look the same, because they're all wearing the same thing (t-shirt + shorts + flat footwear). casual wear in public is a disgrace and a cancer to the city environment

>>12291149
No, how you look partially determines your ideology. Or to be more accurate, there is a biological cause that determines both how you look and your ideology.

>>12291171
>casual wear in public is a disgrace and a cancer to the city environment
Cringe. Chad can wear whatever he wants.

>>12291149
I can always tell a woman is sexually unattractive by how she writes and what she writes about.
Although it's a bit too easy when a certain prominent ideology is basically founded on resentment and weakness.

>>12291119
pol isnt even full of white people, go look at the flags, and then undrestand that many of the flags from white countries arent white people either

>>12291154
>tfw i'll never fuck that lesbian
why even live

>>12291149
Rather, I think people may be suggesting that certain personality and cognitive traits might be correlated with physical traits and metrics, perhaps owing to common influences like prenatal hormone levels or developmental stability. If this is true, and things like Big 5 and g are correlated with political orientation, then it might indeed be the case that appearance could help to predict ideology.

>>12291188
Chad has no place in the city environment but as symbolic reminder of its fundamental diverging from natural existence

>>12291202
too cruel to suffer through

No clear causal link, but:

https://www.brunel.ac.uk/news-and-events/news/articles/Muscular-men-less-likely-to-support-social-and-economic-equality-study-suggests

>The results showed a significant correlation between those with higher bodily formidability and the belief that some social groups should dominate others. These men were also much less likely to support redistribution of wealth.

>But contrary to predictions, there was no correlation between being considered attractive, as measured by waist-to-chest ratio and various facial measures, and whether or not the men supported ‘social dominance orientation’ or redistribution.

>The study showed that more muscular men were less egalitarian, and the number of hours actually spent in the gym was also linked to having less egalitarian socioeconomic beliefs.

>“Our results suggest that wealthier men who are more formidable physically are more likely to oppose redistribution of wealth. Essentially, they seem more motivated to defend their resources. But less wealthy men who are still physically formidable don’t seem more inclined to support redistribution either. They’re not demanding a share of the wealth.

>>12290993
LMAO

>>12291271
>But less wealthy men who are still physically formidable don’t seem more inclined to support redistribution either. They’re not demanding a share of the wealth.
wew

>>12291271
Source study:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513816303907

test

I don't know a single fit leftist

>>12291044
upvoted

>>12291271
Are people who are weak mentally and physically, aka those who have no or very little means of obtaining wealth, not doing the same as the formidable?

They are using what they have to obtain fortune. They are both after the same thing.

>>12290993
Ugly people tend to be more anti-social.

You probably want Sheldon's body types (ecto, meso, and endomorph s) Aldous Huxley has a lecture on them but they're otherwise popular too.

>>12291371
>They are using what they have to obtain fortune. They are both after the same thing.
this is why i say we are already living in the Ancap utopia and always will be

>>12291371
Pretty much, they all want to survive/prosper. They're just using different strategies.

>>12291385
Well, they're less desirable, which makes them socialize less, which has at least two consequences:
1. they become resentful towards people
2. they have more time to contemplate and develop alternative interests, and are therefore less interested in socializing

>>12290993
Mob mentality is deeply rooted in leftism. This is where you find the lesser people get together because they become stronger this way. This is also why minorities vote for the left, and the reason why Dems ruled for so long in so many first world democratic countries, because there is more of the lesser people than better people.

On the other hand of the spectrum, you have individualism. A place where people are content with themselves. These people, contrary to the mob, are usually good looking, intelligent, socialized and generally just decent people.

It's crazy how easy it is to judge and understand people only by their self-expression. It is far less complicated than people think. Obviously, you can always know what they truly think before talking to them, but for the more simple people, it's fairly easy.

You just have to adopt a vision where everything that happens/happened in this world is absolutely normal. It's normal that people behave this way, did this or that.

Obviously, Richard is a socialist. He was lone child and had difficulties making friends. Also, he wasn't particularly beautiful or intelligent. He grew up a little bit disconnected from society, got a job at a restaurant since he has to pay his student loan. He went through a history major. His parents were never rich and couldn't pay. Now he wants more cash from the government, so he voted for the liberal party. He also actively post interracial porn on /pol/ to make the incels mad and feel better about his lonely self. He had a gf once but she dumped him for a better version of himself.

>>12290993
>>12291023
Can phrenology make an academic comeback? Has it ever been experimentally / statistical verified? Maybe the Chinese have continued it?

Lookism is based

chad niggas are libertarians

>>12291396
>You probably want Sheldon's body types (ecto, meso, and endomorph s)
Interesting. They ring true to me, but it might just be confirmation bias.

>>12291451
>It's crazy how easy it is to judge and understand people only by their self-expression.
Thoughts on Vargs views considering his middle class upbringing with well off parents?

>>12291127
Based

sexually unattractive people are typically highly insecure, and their self hatred is reflected in their political ideology

weak people also naturally lean towards collectivist movements/ideologies, as they have no hope in being successful individually, the weak masses must aim towards subverting the strong minorities.

>>12291451
>This is also why minorities vote for the left, and the reason why Dems ruled for so long in so many first world democratic countries
Stopped reading

>>12291451
>and the reason why Dems ruled for so long in so many first world democratic countries
"Dems"? What the fuck are "Dems"? Afaik they're one of the two american party blocks, anon.

>>12291458
What's being discussed in this thread is really physiognomy, not phrenology.

>>12291301
This. Staying fit literally improves your ability to think and removes brain fog. A fit person will always lean toward more rational ideologies

>>12290993
I wonder if entire ideologies have been created because of physical inferiority.

Like contemplative religious traditions always vouch for celibacy for example, and although their arguments are coherent, I can't help but feel that they are rationalizations sprung from lack of pussy. I've never seen a monk, or religious figure, that was a 6'2 big-dicked turbo chad. These are also not the people turning towards these kinds of traditions.
In the same way, the people these days that go around around yelling 'degeneracy!' are always autistic, ugly, beta, small dicked, etc. Again, I've never seen a male model looking ass motherfucker campaigning for celibacy, because of course, why would they? It's not a problematic area of life for them.

I find that in general strong ideologies always attract meek people. Like the Nazi high command was filled with a bunch of manlet, weak jawlined, turbo beta's. Or for example, I like to read up on the occult, and most prominent occult figures have also been fat, ugly, bald, etc.

I reckon it's to do with the fact that when people can't full fill their primary biological function - simply put; they can't get laid- because of physical ineptitude e.g. lack of attractive physical attributes, they turn towards an ideological output to justify their lack of 'base fulfilment'.

>>12291526
That is true. Unattractive people always seem to resort to slave morality and blaming others for all their problems. It's the same on both the left and the right.

that is pseudoscience. i can rep out 3pl8 on bench and am left leaKing.

>>12291552
>Like contemplative religious traditions always vouch for celibacy for example, and although their arguments are coherent, I can't help but feel that they are rationalizations sprung from lack of pussy. I've never seen a monk, or religious figure, that was a 6'2 big-dicked turbo chad. These are also not the people turning towards these kinds of traditions.

the fact that you think the only reactions to sexuality are either being a turbo chad or a being a beta monk in bitter self-imposed isolation says everything about where you're coming from

All philosophies/political systems are physiognomic, you're fooling yourself if you don't think your physical condition correlates to your mental condition, how could it not? Don't you understand the powers that be are doing everything they can to keep you convinced of this dichotomy between physical and mental development?

>>12291568
>3pl8
like webm related huh

>>12291570
It's a mog or be mogged world out there beta bitch

>>12291539
You post this like it's some bait, but it's been true for me.
I never really grasped the appeal of some "right wing" ideas until I started lifting weights.
Although I'm only right wing on some issues...

>>12291552
It's true to an extent, but consider this: most gay men are good looking. Why? I guess because women were too easy and they got bored with them, among other things.

>>12291577

play the world's game like a good little darwincuck, maybe st. peter will do you a solid for fucking so many bitches

>>12291573
>

>>12291597
When you aren't infected with slave morality

>>12291574
I can't arch like that and I use a close grip. there is nothing wrong with this webm though his ass stays on the bench. if you have problem with it you are probably a newfag. in powerlifting you do whatever you can to lift the most weight. i don't compete in powerliftong though.

>>12291552
>Like contemplative religious traditions always vouch for celibacy for example, and although their arguments are coherent, I can't help but feel that they are rationalizations sprung from lack of pussy.
When those traditions were created, access to sex was not related to physical attractiveness. The Stoics were always praising chastity and they usually were rich, married men who could sleep with as many people as they wanted to. Seneca was one of the richest men in Rome and Marcus Aurelius was the Emperor.

>In the same way, the people these days that go around around yelling 'degeneracy!' are always autistic, ugly, beta, small dicked, etc.
I have never seen anyone yelling degeneracy. How did you manage to not only find people doing so but also to see their penises so that you could compare to those of others?

>>12291458
ML face scanning algos are verifying the utility of physiognomy and to a limited degree phrenology. Im sure Chinese forensic science and to a degree Western forensics have already verified most of its predictive power.

>>12291068
>>12290993
The low crotch on his pants combined with the overt length of his shirt (so long to cover his swollen gut) really messes up his proportions. His top half looks way too heavy, giving him that toddler look.

>>12291531
>>12291535
replace Dems by liberal, don't be so harsh, you know what I meant.
>>12291500
Varg is a tough case since he had a very eventful life and is an eccentric individual. Both are related, but in the end, he turned out based af. His philosophy of living is pretty passif right now even though he murdered once. 21 years in prison and the calm lifestyle of the north also has an influence. Do the pathology.

This thread turned out to be way more interesting than I expected.

>>12291154
>straight men are more attractive than gay men
>gay women are more attractive than straight women

What did God mean by this?

>>12291891
wimmin are picky

>>12291891

The forbidden fruit is the juiciest.

>>12291891
>lesbos
>actually lesbian

>>12291891
>straight men are more attractive than gay men
>gay women are more attractive than straight women
In my experience the opposite is true

>>12291056
Continue with Industrial Society and Its Future

>>12291119
They're not attractive but I think you would be surprised at how many boomers with families there are on /pol/ now.

>>12291597
St. Peter will do me a solid for exercising my free will

>>12291929
there are even women boomers now, they swarm to the threads about marriage

>>12291790
What is interesting about a bunch of unfounded pseud hot-takes?

>>12291968
>hot-takes
Redditor detected, fuck off

>>12291968
>someone enjoys something
>pseudè!!!!!!!!!

>>12291979
>>12291986
hot takes is from twitter and you are all VERITABLE psued faggots

>>12291998
Even worse. Drown in diarrhea, subhuman.

>>12290993
The entirety of russian literature

>>12291891
One idea is that fags can get laid easier, so they constantly have to compete by being as pretty as possible, which requires them to constantly be upping the ante (being marginally prettier results in more cummies). Dykes, meanwhile, because of their essentially non-existent sex lives, have no incentive to compete (being marginally prettier does not result in more cummies).

Alternatively, the samples just happened to turn out that way.

>>12291954
I feel like those ones are larpers, but I've seen enough on Twitter to know they exist. The boomers I've met have sent me photos of their houses and backyards to prove they aren't larping (you can tell they are not larping not because they have a house, but because they are dumb enough to post photos).

yes pol incels are ugly losers we all know this is isnt some breaking news

>>12292120
meanwhile
https://www.psychologytoday.com/ca/blog/women-who-stray/201812/feminists-think-sexist-men-are-sexier-woke-men

>>12292128
>girls like bad boys
This isnt news either
Alas the likes of pic related are not viewed as brawlin bad boys who momma told me never to get involved with

>>12292137
do you think that specimen represents the average polposter?

>>12292147
Yes I do

>>12292153
so if i find some pic of a mutant with a sickle and cross then that's the average Leftist?

>>12291979
>>12291986
>Phrenology is real science guys, the Chinese are going to do it.
>The Dems rule the world through ugly minorities who want to steal all the wealth
>you need to have big muscles to have a big brain
>The "powers that be" rule the world through physiognomic ideologies
>Ugly people are resentful and thus are extremists
If you think that any of these opinions are interesting, well thought-out, well researched, or are a product of anything other than cultural osmosis from certain boards on this site, then, and really do mean this, you are a drooling retard who should have a mandated handler to keep you from swallowing hazardous objects.

>>12291201
What does that have to do with anything?

>>12292173
no one cares your aggrieved reddit sensibilities faggot

>>12292173
I see the articles posted triggered you so badly that you couldnt even properly process what they were saying and have created ludicrous strawmen in their place so that you can assure yourself there is no truth content in them.

>>12292153
I don't think the left wants to play the "your side is ugly" game desu

>>12291301
Here’s an obesity map of the US.

All the fattest states went big on Trump on the Election Day

>>12292203
you know what other map looks a lot like that one

>>12292160
Yes it would be safe to assume so
Those who dedicate their lives to radical reactionary ideoligies are typically outcasts of normal society. Fat pink haired dykes and fat balding incels are prime examples.

>>12292210
pol is huge though, and isnt even the incel board, that's r9k. It's just the 'fuck progressives' board really, which is an extremely widespread sentiment right now

>>12292206
No, which map?

>>12292225
>It's just the 'fuck progressives' board really

Not even. It’s just the board for people into politics and shit

>>12292272
I havent been there in a while but idk if its even possible to discuss actual politics without being called a kike or having everyone completely dismiss your post

I don't know if this is representative or an outlier, but I know a 9+/10 Chad at work who openly browses /pol/

>>12292153
Fuck that's some good cringe. Literal art. I mean yeah they are just kids but kids shouldn't be into politics. Really says alot about the times we live in

>>12292210
>Fat pink haired dykes
Then how do you explain all the super attractive girls who also dye their hair and are into weird shit? You say that it's only ugly people who do this but it's not true.

>>12292282
Yeah, I haven’t been there a while either. After just going through some threads, it’s definitely just angry morons

>>12292324
you should be aware that something like 50% of the posts on the board are made by an OP that doesn't even stay for the thread, and are made expressly because the topic posted is so provocative it is sure to enflame the retarded masses that browse the board

>>12292332
I struggle to find even a single post that doesn’t seem written by a complete moron.

It seems like a shit board

>>12292343
it is a shit board, i was just providing a bit of context

>>12292343
I wish the boards were better. I think /lit/ is honestly the best we've got. The absolute state of this site.

>>12292332
Lots of one op post threads with fake news headlines or twitter screencaps as op pic
300+ posts of people taking it serious
I dont know what to think desu

>>12292354
that's just 4chan though, that's how the site works. it's not total free speech, but it's a much better approximation than anywhere else im aware of

There are hundreds of well-moderated sites on the internet for whatever topic you're interested in

>>12292358
I think the whole site would be a lot better if we banned pornography.

>>12292203
Obesity rates for blacks and native Americans are 15% higher than whites.

>>12292366
Yikes, try getting laid for once incel

>>12292355
The most important factor is the sheer size of pol. That means that a)the average quality is going to suck without heavy moderation, and b)the speed of posting disincentivizes effortposts.

Second is the fact that the main demographic of the site are united by one thing, almost apoplectic rage at the current cultural-legal status quo, ie. progressivism. It's not really conducive to measured conversation.

What really sets it off though is that this basically already bad combination of elements is open to trolling by hostile posters and groups because of the extremely lax moderation, and allowance of basically any topic or viewpoint so long as it is related to politics.
It's like if the subreddit Latestagecapitalism(similarly large and retarded) allowed pol to make and upvote threads and posts, they would spend the majority of their time just fending off trolls, but instead they delete anyone who would even try to do that. And people just love trolling pol for exactly that reason, it's easy, the average poster isn't smart or calm enough to not reply to bait, youd have to have a genuinely high quality community for people to just ignore it all.

>>12292374
Some of those fat states, like West Virginia, is pretty much entirely white.

Even keeping that aside, it seems that the fattest states are all pro-trump, being black or white.

>>12292427
Didn't you know? All those obesity, drug-abuse and IQ distribution statistics are actually little more than disgusting mexicans and niggers skewing the results of the study. The average midlander american is a 6'2 +120 IQ christian Chadmuffin.

>>12292896

>>12292323
>Then how do you explain all the super attractive girls who also dye their hair and are into weird shit?
I don't think I've seen one attractive girl in real life that dyed their hair like that.

>>12292956

>>12292323
Non-ideologues can dye their hair. There's a firmer correlation between the thoughts in someone's head that would cause them to dye their hair to being fat ugly dyke than having dyed hair to begin with.
I'm also sure there are a couple of attractive radical feminists, despite infinitesimally few.

>>12290993
Prometheus Rising
>>12291044
He's literally BTFOing /pol/ dumbass

>>12292997
i knew a really hot girl who simply never shut up about feminism. it was almost autistic how often she'd insert it into the conversation

>>12292203
>the people who most benefit from western civilization voted to preserve it
that's fucking amazing

>>12292987
Looks like a mutant. Keep your retarded fetishes to yourself faggot.

>>12292203
I think leftists are in the middle of the bell curve while right wingers are either fat fucks or /fit/ autists

>>12292354
>I think /lit/ is honestly the best we've got
You're kidding, right? Half the threads are incel-related and only normie books are discussed.

>>12291202
>>12291891
Hetero woman looks way better. The atrazine must have got to your brains.

>>12293039
why does everybdoy care about incels so much, i dont get it. there have literally always been weirdos on 4chan, nobody ever got this riled up about robots

>>12292137
im a cis girl, and that guy is sooooo hot. way hotter than literally every left winger. id lick his cum from the floor while wearing a dog leash. id drink his bathwater. im not joking nor being ironic.

>>12293077
Based and redpilled

>>12293062
There's a difference between weirdos and bitter losers. Robots were at least good at generating memes. Incels are a weird reddit/CIA hybrid trying and failing to emulate imageboard culture.

>>12293082
but ever since i can remember on 4chan there have been things like 'tfw no gf' threads, any such thread is now called an incel thread and causes huge amounts of butthurt

like what is the difference between a robot and what people are now calling incels? since i have yet to see anybody label themselves one on 4chan

>>12292956
Have you never been to a college campus anywhere

>>12293079
im serious. all fans of the podcast "chapo trap house" are basically repulsive. meanwhile, id lick the sweat from his calves. id let him dunk his balls into a half-full burgundy glass and then id drink it. im even getting a lil "excited" looking at his picture now. i wanna use his jizz as tooth paste and lip gloss. i wanna deepthroat him from under a desk while he plays video games. meanwhile, socialists instantly turn me off- theyre lanky and smelly and gross. EW!

>>12292173
Phrenology is outdated, but the idea that someone's appearance correlates with his psychology absolutely isn't.

>>12292427
Trump-voting states also had more google searches for things like “erectile distinction” and “how to make penis larger”

>>12294063
I also saw that article on reddit, fellow redditor.

>>12294078
>Wilhelm "Aurora Borealis is sexual energy" Reich

>>12294071
I actually picked it up on Paul Krugman’s twitter feed ;^)

>>12294083
Do people still take that hack seriously after he got his column?

>>12293023
predictable dishonest response lol

>>12291451
>why Dems ruled for so long in so many first world democratic countries, because there is more of the lesser people than better people.
the fuck? You actually think every country has the same political parties? How old are you?
>>12291451
>Obviously, Richard is a socialist. He was lone child and had difficulties making friends
Who the fuck is Richard? Who are you talking about?

I was banned because I posted this pic with the most surgical anti-american critique /lit/ has ever seen
fuck jannies and fuck anglos

>>12292147
It absolutely does

>>12292210
>radical reactionary
these two words are antonyms buddy

>>12291301
Felix Biederman

>>12292956
Have you never been to a city? Where do you live?

>>12290993
Waiting for someone to point out this guy is a happily married self-made millionaire who gets to do whatever the fuck he wants all day. What are you "based" "redpilled" bitches doing with your lives?

>>12292203
>leftcuck commies mad that CHAD right wingers be eatin good

Smdh

>>12291078
How is this myth still not dead? The study showed that strength correlates inversely with class in ideology. IE the weaker but wealthier or stronger but poorer you are, the more left wing you would be

>>12290993
How to Judge People by What They Look Like by Ed Dutton. Terrible book, but fulfils OPs requirement.

>>12291451
>This is also why minorities vote for the left, and the reason why Dems ruled for so long in so many first world democratic countries, because there is more of the lesser people than better people.
Are we suddenly forgetting the American labour/socialist movement again?

>>12291451
>He also actively post interracial porn on /pol/ to make the incels mad and feel better about his lonely self.
Hilarious Freudian slip.

>>12294994
Yeah that's what is aid in my caveat. Also this is only restricted to economic redistribution, not even other progressive/reactionary stances (though i imagine the average prole is far more reactionary here as well).

>>12295010
>these being anything but a meme

Closest you got is progressive succdems

>>12295025
>Yeah that's what is aid in my caveat
No you didn't? Nor did the paper itself said the weightlifting causes ideological shift, but rather only correlation. And previous papers before either mention no correlation or straght up correlation strength with ideology (ie stronger means more likely to be left winger). Not only did you 'forget' the bifurcated correlations, but you somehow fever dream a causation in a correlation study. Which makes me doubt your perception of anything let alone the average 'prople'

>>12295029
>literally memeing its way to a 8/8/8 workday and Labour Day
>literally bombed and sabotaged so much to incite the First Red Scare
Really makes me think...

>>12292956
I've seen literal 10/10s with weird hair colors. Where do you live

>>12290993

Kind of sad that he's actually malformed.

>>12291194
Internet fascism?

>>12295003
I want to check it out, but can't find epub or even pdf. I've looked at libgen and tpb...
Where do you people get ebooks anyway?

>>12291149
Yeah look at these fascists.

>>12295358
The face of the alt right

>>12291154
>I look like the fag
Just let me die in my sleep already

>>12292147
Does anyone have that webm/YouTube video of /pol/tards drinking canned beer at midday at a park playground whilst shouting memes and racist nonsense at the toddlers going down the slides and shit?

Seeing that retarded poster saying that lifting will cause an ideological shift to the right made me remember the time that this (https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0956797612466415)) exploded on the internet. Suddenly there was articles, tweets, threads exclaiming that leftists were weaklings. Threads here would even get derailed. I personally wanted to find the source and as I clicked through link after link, the articles became more and more naucned. Starting from 'LEFTISTS ARE WEAK LMAO' to 'Champagne socialist are weak!" finally to a reddit headed by the title Richer socialists are more likely to have lower strength. Finally when I found the paper itself and saw what it exactly, a permanent contempt of the Right grew in me. It confirms a trend I notice in the Right to weaponized its ignorance, whether by twisting or straight up ignoring context and nuance to own the Left epic style. Right wingers seem to constantly do shit like this, whether by claiming a study of the optimization of ants workload to prevent congestion in tunnels is a endorsement of Patreo's principle therefore capitalism, to quoting Orwell (especially Wigan Pier) to browbeat the socialists.

>>12295401
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfqAkUXKT5Y

>>12295402
You type like a fag

>>12295358
I consider myself a liberal, but i this face really pisses me off and i have no idea why.
Apart from Rich evans at the bottom.

>>12291585
Men are much easier than women. Only a retard would think otherwise.

>>12295413
Got my hopes up there. Haven't found it in years of searching.