[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 74 KB, 580x580, harold-bloom-10-questions.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12270169 No.12270169 [Reply] [Original]

Who's gonna be the steward of the English language when Harold Bloom is gone?

>> No.12270181
File: 370 KB, 1269x632, 1543719717118.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12270181

us

>> No.12270189

>>12270181
but like who are we ?
are we even real?

>> No.12270222

>>12270181
Unironically this and it's scary. The state of literary discussion is so bad that /lit/ is undoubtedly the best place on the Internet for it and there are people who browse and post here who genuinely don't read.

>> No.12270258

>>12270181
me on the left with the log

>> No.12270348
File: 374 KB, 600x600, Tao+Lin+-+author+photo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12270348

Tao once he completes his training

>> No.12270373

>>12270181
Why do people do this arrogant shit where they pretend to be stupid when they know they are very clearly above average intelligence?
>>12270258
>on the left

>> No.12270468

>>12270169
Michael Silverblatt

>> No.12270478

>>12270468
He’ll die two or three years after Bloom does though. He’s very old. Also he’s a good reader and interviewer but his taste is pretty weak. He seems to love any new trendy literary fiction that comes out. He’s not really comparable to Bloom. I like him a lot more than Bloom though.

>> No.12270483

probably Tylo B. Chillin

>> No.12270498

>>12270348
No, he'll never be a steward of the kind bloom was for the simple fact that he's Chinese

>> No.12270504

>>12270373
>>on the left
The true brainlet appears

>> No.12270505

>>12270348
He’s a 90 IQ near illiterate.

>> No.12270514
File: 51 KB, 684x470, jonathanfranzen-750.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12270514

>> No.12270564

>>12270169
the editorial board of the NY-times

>> No.12270573

>>12270348
He admitted he has an IQ of 90 and doesn't actually understand the books he writes or the praise they get.

>> No.12270576

>>12270373
>>on the left
Y-y-your left and my l-left is not the same.

>> No.12270609

>>12270373
That's the joke brainlet

>> No.12270624

>>12270573
No he didn’t.

>> No.12271119

>>12270478
He's only 66. Bloom is like 90. What's wrong with taking about new books or liking new books? Everybody here seems to hate anything that is popular or new even if its actually good. Do you read the books that he talks about?

>> No.12271148

>>12271119
Bloom is a defender of the canon which is what the thread is about. Silverblatt gushes about books with titles like “What We Saw on the Way Home” which will be forgotten 2 years after they are published and deservedly so. He may have some loftier tastes but he is not going to be some great defender of serious literature. And yes, years ago before I became more discerning I read a lot of contemporary lit, often stuff on his recommendation and it is mostly forgettable.

>> No.12271156

>>12270181
Unironically this and it's scary. The state of literary discussion is so bad that /lit/ is undoubtedly the best place on the Internet for it and there are people who browse and post here who genuinely don't read.

>> No.12271168

>>12271156
Why did you re-post this. It’s also here >>12270222

>> No.12271169

>>12271148
What, in you opinion is the latest great work of literature?

>> No.12271175

>>12270181

Unironically this and it's scary. The state of literary discussion is so bad that /lit/ is undoubtedly the best place on the Internet for it and there are people who browse and post here who genuinely don't read.

>> No.12271186

>>12271169
Just pretend I said something you don’t like so you feel excused from having to think about unpleasant things.

>> No.12271188

>>12271148
Also, what do you expect from him? He has to put out a lot of episodes of radio, so how selective can he be? He's had a lot of greats on there though. Delillo, Vonnegut, Wallace, Morrison. He has to be polite to his guests. Maybe their books aren't the greatest of all time but he's not going to tell them that to their face.

>> No.12271190

>>12270181
Unironically this and it's scary. The state of literary discussion is so bad that /lit/ is undoubtedly the best place on the Internet for it and there are people who browse and post here who genuinely don't read.

>> No.12271199

>>12271188
I don’t know how to be more clear about this. I don’t expect anything from him. Remember I said I like him. I think he’s delightful. He’s just not going to take over for Bloom as the main defender of literature.

>> No.12271229

>>12271199
Oh, I thought you were the one who said he had weak taste. I now see your point. No way he could become Bloom, because in order to become Bloom he'd have to become a cranky wind bag

>> No.12271615

>>12270514
Hardly. Too specialized, too involuted.

>> No.12271845

>>12270169
Edmund Wilson was the last steward of the canon. Bloom is no substitute. The position is long dead.

>> No.12271876

>>12270348
>a 90 IQ Chinaman is the next great steward of the English language
Just pack it up boys. The West had a good run while it lasted.

>> No.12271884

>>12271876
90 IQ Chinaman is equivalent to 130 IQ in round-eye.

>> No.12271901

>>12270169
It's too bad Leonard Wolf never passed Bloom.

>> No.12271925

>>12271884
Are you out of your mind
Most Chinese are dumb as fuck. The reason their IQ statistics are slightly higher than average is because they don't give them to the vast majority of the massive amounts of retarded mudhut dwellers outside of the big cities

>> No.12271936

>>12270181
Unironically this and it's scary. The state of literary discussion is so bad that /lit/ is undoubtedly the best place on the Internet for it and there are people who browse and post here who genuinely don't read.

>> No.12271959

>>12271884
Chinese people are frighteningly stupid lmao

>> No.12271964

>>12270169
Me

>> No.12273697

>>12270181
Unironically this and it's scary. The state of literary discussion is so bad that /lit/ is undoubtedly the best place on the Internet for it and there are people who browse and post here who genuinely don't read.

>> No.12273730
File: 55 KB, 563x339, facepalm-jewish.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12273730

>>12270169
Harold Bloom is a kike; he was never a "steward" of European literary culture or our language, but an enemy gatekeeper. And goyim who 'based jew' post about Bloom because he pretended to despise 'multiculturalists' and 'Marxists' need to stfu. He was never on our side, just boiling the frog slower than his kinsmen, whom he never ascribed rightful blame to as progenitors of those things anyway.

>> No.12273744

>>12273730
yet he did more for your people and your culture than you will ever do

>> No.12273756

>>12273744
Bloom has not preserved or advanced the European literary tradition, he has only degraded it at a slower rate than jews have our culture generally.

>> No.12274651

>>12273730
/pol/ plz leave

>> No.12275003

>>12270181
Unironically this and it's scary. The state of literary discussion is so bad that /lit/ is undoubtedly the best place on the Internet for it and there are people who browse and post here who genuinely don't read.

>> No.12275017

Michael Wood probably

>> No.12275106

>>12270169
Pewds

>> No.12275117
File: 120 KB, 442x269, 1498742901815.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12275117

>>12273730
I don't even like Jews as a whole but Bloom is clearly based.

>> No.12275123

>>12273730
The thing is, he’s the same as the school of resentment that he complains about. Just not about literature specifically, but about religion. His Marxism is Gnosticism. Read his writings on religion and if you replaced a few keywords with leftist rhetoric it is no different. He’s resentful of Yahweh. He hates Him, the miserable fat fuck.

>> No.12275126
File: 35 KB, 1200x675, 8wa7mrbc1h111.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12275126

>>12270169
Pewdiepie

>> No.12275173

>>12275123
With Bloom even woke whites are too easily fooled and revert to their judeo-Christian-slave programming by believing he is representing them and their culture nobly in the first place. Sure, Bloom wasn't a totally malicious like promoting trannies and mulattos into our canon left and right, but that is not a compliment, nor should he have ever been in such a position of influence in the first place. A half-decent or not totally subversive jew is still your enemy. Bloom is also more of a silent generation stubborn old school jew more than the 60s Marxist variety.

>> No.12275736

>>12270181
came here to say this, i'll fucking play you in fortnite for title of the defender of the tongue.