/lit/ - Literature

yes you are pseud because you are guided by binary constructs and try to quantify unquantifiable

>>12159064
It's futile I know, but a general idea of how people think can still be constructed.

>>12159058
I think the results were accurate

this is a cool test anon, good work. the questions are well thought out

some of these "-ism"s on the two poles of various axoims aren't really opposed to each other, they are more like monadic systems of their own. how is rationalism the opposite of romanticism? or why is skepticism placed vs. absolutism?
another issue is that the "-ism"s themselves are usually very vague, and you have to explicitly state what they mean.
the questions are about people's psychology and minor preferences, rather than philosophical beliefs and ideals. the result just gives you some fashionable name to identify with because of some preferences, you knowing the reasons behind goes completely out of question.
all in all if this catches on it will just contribute to making more of a whore out of philosophy, like those facebook meme pages are doing. zero substance and thinking, just names and labels and memes.

>>12159064
>7 axis, each an spectrum
>REEEE BINARIES
>muh quantification (this is not btw)
you are more of a pseud than OP

>>12159136
in OPs defense i don't think things need to be exact opposites for them to make sense being opposite of each other

>>12159058
I'm not particularly committed. These tests generally rely on a gut instinct reaction, the problem is that when the topic is philosophy our thoughts tend to be a lot more nuanced. The way questions are phrased doesn't really allow for much distinction between private/subjective preferences (I would rather live in x society... which could reflect any temperament, altruism, egoism, etc.) and absolute/objective (x social order is good).

Good work OP, that's pretty close to reality

>>12159064
And those questions aren't very accurate. One should think about what the author wants to ask or just have a pleb understanding of thos topics.

Despite of that, it's the best personality test I've made.

huh

Is there a way to view all the possible results?

>>12159158
I just try to ignore the nuance and know that the question is asking for a general answer on a broad level. There are important specifics that >>12159109
wont tell you about me, but as he says here>>12159082
its still a good general description

How based am I?

>>12159058
>99% nihilism
accurate

>>12159220
>Platonism uses the Chainlink logo
Interesting

>>12159220
>Moralist
Extremely bluepilled.
Real world is gonna hurt you.

>>12159225
what do the icons mean?

>>12159244
Objectivism
Hobbessian

>>12159241
>Real world
Which of the materialists in this thread are you?

cute

Damn, how boring am I?

>>12159058
Nice little test OP, well done.

I am the NEET philosopher king.

>this many nihilists
no wonder this board is shit

>>12159058
pic rel
>t. all of the philosophy is just annotations to Plato
>>12159225
disgusting

>>12159316
>RETARD ALERT

>>12159330
Found the solipist.

>>12159365
Wrong

>>12159058

this is the picture of a fedora tipper lmao

strange

>>12159285
>Rationalism/Romanticism 50/50
kek

>Autism 95.65%

>>12159331
This is why most wise men weren’t atheists.

>>12159435
If by wise you mean mentally handicapped, you're right.

>>12159109
you're a top lad, anon

nope, no way I'm dead center between the idealism of the dictionary and the pragmatism of the dictionary
op went out of his way to come across as thinking the only positions in moral philosophy are either Stirner or Jesus, where da community at senpai

>>12159171
see pic related

>>12159484
JUST

>INTP personality type
>37% rational
Oof

what do you guys think of this?

Quizzes that tell you what you think are gay.

Strongly Agree.

>>12159058
too many axes, not enough sweeping conclusions about my personality

accurate

>>12159058
Rate

What do these results say about me?

>>12159544
based and redpilled

>>12159550
you're a softie with no real convictions
a good friend though

I guess its somewhat accurate.

I'm Muslim, not Christian though

Accurate. I like it.

The brain has a smiley face.

>>12159550
Get TRT.

>>12159501
awesome pics, great size

>>12159058

M

G O L D E N

A

N

>>12159667
shit bad formatting

>>12159225
My nigga

close to 50/50 on almost anything cept altruism.
just tryin to be a good person

“Educating the mind without educating the heart is no educatiok at all”
“Be kind, everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle”
Both strongly agree

Very cool test anon

>50/50 idealist pragmatist
damn I've been a faggy radical centrist all along

>>12159732
*centrist chad

>>12159709
Very Reddit

>>12159058

What does this say about me?

>>12159806
You like rick and morty

>>12159810
I've never watched it.

The only philosophy I've read is the entire works of Plato

>>12159058
I hate when these quizzes pad their question count out by just rewording shit, this is just the inverse of the "ends justify the means" question it gave me 2 questions earlier

Gives me a 404 on the results page :-(

This website doesn't even exist fuck off

>>12159058
Error 404, did you cancel the website?

>>12159058
It gives me a 404

>>12159220
The high asceticism makes up for the rest.

Sorry lads it got taken down because of too much traffic - I'll see if I can get it back up

New URL for anyone just seeing this thread:
http://dichotomytests.co.nf/test.html?id=0

Only a temp fix but I'll have to buy more hosting

>>12159871
>>12159876
>>12159894
>>12159899
>>12159928
new link: http://dichotomytests.co.nf/test.html?id=0

>>12159058
This sort of shit just doesnt and will never work with philosophy since the field is about fundamental assumptions. For example "Egoism" and "Altruism" cant be measured as characteristics because they dont refer to personal qualities but certain understanding of the social fields on which personal qualities are played out.

tl;dr you are a brainlet and these tests always suck, even astrology is unironically better because it is spiritual hoodoo upfront

>tfw INTP fence-sitter
feels good not feeling too extremely about anything in particular

>>12159591
You haven't seen nothing yet

>>12159992
You are INFP

>>12159255
>>12159225
>>12159174
>>12159167
>>12159166
>>12159158
You all sicken me

>>12159058
The link isn't working for me. Is there something wrong?

>>12160080
see >>12159932

>>12159502
this

>>12159550
You seem like a chill dude.

it's no longer up?

Can someone tell me what this means?
I said I don't know to a lot of them.

>>12159058
>philosophy test
>am I a pseud?
as if you have to fucking ask

>>12160195
see >>12159932

>>12159846
> t. brainlet
those two questions are clearly distinct

Meh, lacks nuance on many points.

um

what am i, other than a faggot?

For this I think you got the first two words mixed up. Or you forgot a question mark.

>>12160381
>>12159932

>intentionally go out of my way to avoid the neutral option
>fence-sitter nature still comes out

Fuck. How come I don't get icons at the bottom like the rest of you guys?

>>12159058
I dunno why I did this, or what it proves; but here it is.

Would expect my skepticism to be higher but otherwise I feel it's about right.

No Wonder I dont fit in on /lit/

>>12160553
Those results seem pretty /lit/-tier to me

>>12159058
OP THE LINK IS DOWN!!

Please make it available again, it was a good test. I want to send it to some friends.

Shitposting is sentient

>>12160558
Please look harder next time
>>12159940

I guess I don't know where to stand.

>>12160624
I think you should try to understand Platonic thinking a little more. It'll carry over into spiritualism.

Also, Maybe try understanding the necessities of human emotions, you seem to work with logic for your world view which isn't bad, but you are essentially only using half your brain power when you do that. Emotion is an objective way of viewing phenomenon, so use it.

Getting a 403. What's the deal, OP?

>>12159058
Link is down

Link is R.I.P.

It works for me: http://dichotomytests.co.nf/

>>12160602
>>12160726
>>12160733
>>12160745
OP here, old link 404'd because of traffic - new link is: http://dichotomytests.co.nf/
I'm going to try and see if I can re-register the old link

>>12159058
>stirner as opposed to altruism
No, he just felt you should be altruistic for reasons other than societal pressures like national pride.

>>12160396
Nice spot, fixed it

Intresting test but the questions definitely need to be less generalized and abstract, not that its a bad thing but for a 2 binary scale it just doesnt work

pretty accurate, good job OP

Not sure how accurate this is. I mean, I don't watch porn or drink, but I still browse 4chan; I can't be that ascetic

>>12159058
Accurate

>>12159058
Link isn't working.

>>12160841
Refer to
>>12160777

:-)

I got a cross at the bottom.

What does this mean anons

Seems legit although I consider myself more of a materialist and skeptic than this indicates.

>>12160815
very similar results anon.
do you like jordan peterson

>>12160891
It means you're based and redpilled

>>12159630
The cross symbol just means monotheist

I'd put people in death camps if given the chance.

>>12160929
I feel like this is the most based spectrum

I don't really know what to take from this, do these near 50/50 splits indicate I'm a realist or something? If it helps anyone to know, I'm not religious.

>>12159992
Probably more INFP. Get TRT before it's too late.

>>12160071
We don't think of you at all.

>>12160929
We're actually really close, besides nihilism
>>12160946
This is me, and I share your sentiment.

>>12159058
If you guys enjoyed this, I suggest you check out buzzfeed! lots of cool and fun stuff like this on there ^-^

>>12160964
>wah le edgy self-aware humor
people like quizzes you nigger

>>12160970
Chill and fun-pilled

>>12159058
It was fun

>>12159109
You wanna be a monk or something?

>We are all insignificant in the eyes of the universe.
I hate questions like these. The universe doesn't have eyes. Or to not take it too literally, the universe as a whole doesn't have a subjective experience or qualia. We as a species have these "eyes" so to speak and we are a part of the universe, and we are significant to one another, so from that perspective you could answer in the affirmation. But without this context answering in agreement or disagreement implies some sort of spiritual-religious sense of significance or insignificance that neither of which represent my beliefs well.

>>12159058
Seems to be a hit OP

>>12159064
There's no such thing as unquantifiable. You just have very poor understanding of neurons, brain chemistry, and mathematics.

>>12159058
I'm a pretty neutral fella.

>>12159109
Mine was very similar

>>12161075
>62 tabs
What the heck, anon

>>12161029
That's the case with some of the questions. Like
>Life is suffering and fundamentally meaningless.
What if I consider life meaningless but not suffering? I'm enjoying it but I don't consider it having any particular meaning. Or what if I consider life suffering but not meaningless?
>There is an underlying morality in everything that we do.
Morality means different things for different people. Whether you're a hedonist or utilitarian, wouldn't your own actions will always seem moral in your framework?
>Without music, life would be a mistake.
Music or art in general? How do deaf people play into this? I find music enjoyable but I find reading much more.
>Life is despair.
etc. They're not really questions with clearly defined yes/no answers. But it's good enough given that anything more accurate than this would have to be a personal 1 on 1 analysis. You can't really get too deep with mass-produced surveys aimed at thousands of people at the same time.

It'd be interesting if people also posted their results to this
https://www.16personalities.com/free-personality-test
alongside their chart.

Dang, im so extreme for some of the categories...

>>12161101
Yeah, every time I want to use the web I just open a new tab. When it reaches 100 open tabs I usually just close everything and start the cycle again.

>>12159231
trust in him

>>12161157
Not a bad thing

wtf it crashed?

>DO YOU WANT A LAMBORGHINI OR DO YOU WANT TO FEED POOR STARVING PATHETIC 3RD WORLD KIDS?
>70% altruism
I think these questions need a bit more tweaking in the nuance department, I'm a piece of shit but I'm not gonna WANT some poor runt to die so I can drive a Fisker

>>12161268
those poor starving children are starving for a reason. If the local society can’t support them, then said society should decrease in size until it can support itself.
I’d go with the lambo

>>12159496
>believes in myers-briggs (the astrology for men)
should be a lower rational rating, you fucking idiot

>>12159058
I cant access it

>>12160553
This is fucking gay

>>12161297
Forget about this. This one >>12161157 is even gayer

What does this say about me?

>>12161343
Also, I dodn't get the little icons at the bottom

>tfw INTP
>>>>>>

>>12161302
Just cuz I'm gay doesn't mean i dont know that it's morally wrong

>>12160948
infp here :/ what is TRT?

>>12161041
Quantify THIS

>ESTJ masterrace

Pretty much 50/50 on all of them except I was 90% ascetic.
I had exact 50/50 splits in Idealism vs Pragmatism and Rationalism vs Romanticism.
Can't post the actual thing because my mouse is broken, but you get the idea. Want to sit in the woods eating raw potatoes and drinking rain water but unable to commit to anything else.

How close to being the overman am I?

404

How about this?

>>12161393
Testosterone Replacement Therapy. Don't listen to anon, non-INFPs feel threatened by INFPs because they show that it's okay to be emotional and vulnerable, something most guys struggle dealing with.

I'm too much of a skeptic for these tests

>>12159058
>tfw conflicted and inconsistent

I don't like it, had to stop 5 questions in. Keep trying.
Also the purpose of this test is redundant. Anyone with any real knowledge of philosophy already knows what the believe.

what am I?

>>12161673
ty :D yeah I've never thought of it like that. I still figure most people on this board are probably in tune with themselves, have a higher degree of empathy thanks to the great writers, and are comfortable with all the irrationality that comes with being a human.

wtf why cant i acess it?

reminder that if you get more than 70% on one side of a dyad you are an edgelord and probably a pseud

>>12161957
>muh edgy
Plebbit is that way, fag.

>>12161963
>t. how could anyone believe in god when we have science am I right guise xD

>>12161964
>projecting your hatred this hard
Did your uncle touch you as a child? Was he a fedora tipper? Come here and give me a hug anon.

>>12161946
I honestly think this shit is a ruse being played by these dumb motherfuckers.

>>12161946
because op is an autist, just copy the main link
http://dichotomytests.co.nf/

THESE are the only CHAD results:
>Materialism 100%
>Egoism 77%
>Pragmatism 90%
>Hedonism-Asceticism 50%
>Nihilism 95%
>Romanticism 77%
>Skepticism 90%

>>12159058
What sort of philosophies am I oriented towards?

Stoicism maybe?

Thinking about becoming Catholic. Come at me.

>>12159109
based

>>12161737
Top tier.

am i a center cuck ?

>>12161285
In fact, they're probably starving due to foreign aid and the like. I don't mean they wouldn't have been born, I mean the industries, businesses, and infrastructure that would exist cannot when foreigners flood their economies with free shit -- especially when a lot of the money that goes into it simply goes to the cosy elite of these countries which have no interest in the population's welfare or developing their countries unless it coincides with personal wealth and power.

>>12161865
gey

What are some other quizzes related to philsophy or personality?

I've already done the Myer Briggs.

ENFP according to the science-horoscope meme

>>12159058
100% hedonistic? bit much but ok

>>12162485
Based on your score you should probably be executed.

>>12162485
soiboi bugman'

>>12162485
based

Cool test op.

>>12162485
Holy shit what a parasite. I guess to your benefit, the only reason someone like you wouldn't kill yourself is that you're so busy sucking your own dick that you aren't even aware of how disgusting you are as a human being.

>>12160647
Thanks, it seems emotions are my blindspot. The subject is too prevalent in my life for me to ignore it anymore. I'll have to accept them and use them. Dumb robotic autism is not a good way to emote.

>>12162503
>>12162506
>>12162752
i think you guys are overreacting a tad. i just answered the questions honestly rather than pretending to be living some sort of idealized life. i like to have a good time but i don't think i'm 100% hedonistic

fun test !

>>12162485
>>12161042
cool

>>12159058

a quality addition to my collection of online personality, political alignment and IQ quiz results
thanks OP

What does this mean about myself?
Recommended readings?

Do huemans like me even exist anymore?

>>12162978
no

>>12161146

>>12161075 >my philosophy axis

MBTI in picture, socionics is more accurate for introverts though. With socionics I always get INTp or INFp, both are way more accurate descriptions.

403 forbidden ;_;

I'm a fucking FENCE SITTER REEEEEEE

This thread was moved to >>>/his/5741745