[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 14 KB, 220x268, Thomas Sowell.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12137715 No.12137715 [Reply] [Original]

My people keep consuming e-celeb trash and obscure manuscripts from 300 years ago. Can /lit/ recommend contemporary authors (1900+) that are Right-Wing?

>> No.12137720

Spengler

>> No.12137730

>>12137715
>my people
fuck off back to your containment site, let them keep their e-celebs as long as they don't ooze into here

>> No.12137732

>>12137720
Eh, not OP, but from what I see this dude is NatSoc, not my kind of nationalism, mate

>> No.12137743

>>12137730
Give me dank recs and I can carry them back to my homeland in peace.

>> No.12137751
File: 93 KB, 834x615, the_donald.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12137751

>>12137715
>Thomas Sowell
If by right-wing, you mean 'basic bitch neo-con' then failing to find literature supporting it is just you being lazy. Also
>my people
Please go back to wherever you came from

>>12137732
>Decline of the West
>NatSoc

>> No.12137759

>>12137743
Or you'll bring more of your people here, than Peterson did

>> No.12137760

>>12137715
Spengler, Heidegger, Gentile, Schmitt, Evola, and Guenon. Though Guenon is technically apolitical. Depending on how loosely you define right-wing, there's also Baudrillard, Foucault, Lasch, Land, and Peterson.

>> No.12137766

>>12137715
Start with
>Adam Smith
>Kant
Then
>Marx
>Kierkegaard
>Keynes
>Churchill
>Hayek
>Freedman

>> No.12137771

>>12137766
Add Heidegger and Baudrillard too

>> No.12137783
File: 232 KB, 1527x2339, 71lpL9hW7hL.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12137783

>>12137715
Roger Scruton

>> No.12137789

>>12137760
>That list
Thanks anon, time to learn what this "German Idealism" is all about. *tips hat*
>>12137759
Sorry for bothering you, sir. I'll be on my way.

>> No.12137809

>>12137766
Precisely none of these authors were right-wing.

>> No.12137812

>>12137751
He's a basic-bitch neo-con, but he's great as babby's first redpill. He really lays out the concept of philosophical struggles being the -true- hidden battle of concrete IRL politics. (i.e. it's not really about Rep vs Dem, it's about X philo vs Y philo) Sure guys like Marx do this too, but Sowell is more digestible for noobs

>> No.12137825
File: 15 KB, 214x236, 1543111550748.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12137825

>>12137809
Adam Smith is the literal definition of right-wing, if we go by political compass, where left counts as communism and right as against most regulations.

>> No.12137864

>>12137809
Most of them would be right wing, also, you need to understand critiques of capitalism to not get trapped in ideology

>> No.12137881

>>12137825
This legit blew my mind. I need to have a drink and think about this.

>> No.12137891

This is a terrible thread. Going to throw pearls before swine here:
Okay never mind I don’t want to ;) enjoy ur evola and sowell freaks...

>> No.12137894

>>12137732
>>12137720
Spengler isn't even really NatSoc, dude just kind of says cultures do not have continuity between each other, that the west would die on the killing fields of Ypres (I suggest reading Weber in conjunction with Spengler to see what I'm getting at here) . Kuhn goes into better detail and more thought than Spengler does in his first few chapters over science and mathematics and, even Weber in the start of Spirit of Capitalism touches on the concept of, "huh eurocentrism is an interesting little thing, maybe there are more ways to skin the cat, but here's how we're skinning the cat for the next few weeks in the course of euro/western history:..."

>> No.12137903

>>12137809
The capatalists are cuz no regulation and the Marxists are cuz no government at all. Marxism proper is right wing, it's manifestations, such as Stalinism, are far left wing.

>> No.12137904

>>12137789
>Thanks anon, time to learn what this "German Idealism" is all about. *tips hat*
Did you just come from reddit after hearing about 4chan being split into two boards?

>> No.12137911

>>12137894
The idea of a lack of cultural/historical continuity is a hard pill to swallow. I imagine Kuhn's "Paradigm Shifts" are the proposed replacement. I gotta check out Spengler and Kuhn to get a better grasp on this. With all that's going on these days it really does feel like a Paradigm Shift, from what-to-what I don't know.

>> No.12137917

>>12137904
>What is nice trolling
This dude had some mad hostility right from the start, so I was tryin' to be faggy and calm him down

>> No.12137921

>Socially right wing
>left wing economically

Is this radical centrism or am I just a meme-brain

>> No.12137923

>>12137894
Also, I understand that maybe not all the authors in the thread are themselves Right-Wing, but their works are a solid education and provide an understanding that other Rightists tend to bounce off of. I'm not a Stormfag, but I'm solid-Right and I got the most eye-opening benefit from Marx and Alinsky so far.

>> No.12137932

>>12137911
I would argue that we're in the midst of an interregnum with the rationalization and quantization and/(or?) quantification of human behaviors through big data and would probably lend one to reading Weber and McLuhan. I would say don't even bother with Baudrillard or Debord. I think Debord paints a, if not a poetic and manifesto-like deluge (akin to an atomic-age soothsayer giving a revelation to the people of the world), perspective that lends one to understand the tools used to reforge human behavior and identity to be quantifiable.

>> No.12137933

>>12137921
How do you feel about foreign policy?
If Hawk > Neo-Con
If Weak Dove > Centrist
If Strong Dove > Trumpist

>> No.12137947

>>12137923
Frankly, I appreciate your designs towards a world where man lives off his hands and strength alone but we're stuck in a point in history where yes, power has always been an exponential force, but the means in which it can be compounded can be done in a multi-lateral (not in the sense of multiple nations working in cohort, but that is a part in which can be used) fashion in which the abilities to change the way the world spins is terrifying and cannot behold us to men acting in singular fashion.

Also, you generally won't find anyone whose worth reading that would actually concern themselves to be "right wing" or "left wing" as these are just signs in which you can ascribe to an advertisement to have your publicist shill over WaPost or the New York Times "best seller" list. I think you would enjoy Weber's The Protestant Ethic and The Spirit of Capitalism as it provides an interesting insight into the trajectory that has been provided by the methodist/protestant tradition alongside the influence of the rationalists within it and how it has affected the modern world and the trajectory of the then-West at large.

>> No.12137949

>>12137732
why do you even try to read
you're a fucking programmed moron

>> No.12137955

>>12137933
Probably strong dove, ah shit dude im a magapede

>> No.12137959

>>12137923
>I willingly terrorize myself with fantasies of the possible exonyms that could be applied to me if I step out of line
you are not ready for philosophy
you need to go back to the sand box to play for a long, long time, probably forever

>> No.12137971

>>12137959
>Defining myself specifically to avoid confusion and creating a wasted discussion
>Being afraid of what people will call me

>> No.12137990
File: 70 KB, 789x1200, 1001004001636048.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12137990

>>12137715
Michael Oakeshott

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/oakeshott/

>> No.12137994

>>12137959
What do you mean, if he steps out of line? There is nothing Marxist about our current dynamic in the US, or even in fucking China. You can maybe summon Alinsky here, as the concept of astroturfing is a noted phenomenon-- but where will he be victim to this?

>> No.12138040

>>12137715
Yeats
>We Irish, born into that ancient sect
>But thrown upon this filthy modern tide
>And by its formless spawning fury wrecked,
>Climb to our proper dark, that we may trace
>The lineaments of a plummet-measured face.

Also TS Elliot, DH Lawrence, even Virginia Woolf. A lot of the pre-WW2 modernists had quite reactionary and anti-modern ideas actually.
Ezra Pound is another one, though I've not read his work, and Dosto too, though he's from before the 1900s and ymmv on whether he's a modernist or not.

>> No.12138053

>>12138040
>Woolf
Were talking about right-wing authors, not light shades of progressivism.

>> No.12138097

>>12138053
>genius like shakespeare's is not born among labouring, uneducated, servile people.
-v woolf
Just like all the authors I listed she's got a nuanced worldview, but she's an avowed elitist and has a lot of ideals that would be considered reactionary today.

>> No.12138117

>>12138040
Added to my list. Thanks anon. Really appreciate it.

>> No.12138129

>>12138097
>genius like shakespeare's is not born among labouring, uneducated, servile people.

common sense wisdom of all civilized people of all classes in the entire history of the entire world up to the mid-19th century and entirely consistent with the ideology of the turn-of-the-century Progressives; this board really is saturated with know-nothing zoomers

>> No.12138403

>>12138129
whatever man you're just bickering for the sake of it

>> No.12138553

Y I K E S
I
K
E
S

>> No.12138919

>>12137720
>Spengler
>right-wing

He transcends such simple dichotomies.

>> No.12138927
File: 23 KB, 435x500, toynbee.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12138927

Everybody always recommends Spengler but my boy never gets any love.

>> No.12138952
File: 95 KB, 850x400, Innis.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12138952

>>12137715
Innis

Most writers are occupied in providing accounts of the content of philosophy, science, libraries, empires, and religions. Innis invites us instead to consider the formalities of power exerted by these structures in their mutual interaction. He approaches each of these forms of organized power as exercising a particular kind of force upon each of the other components in the complex.

>> No.12138954

>>12137921
Just go full NazBol or Old Left.

>> No.12139278

>>12137766
This, also add Mises into the mix

>> No.12139295

>>12137921
try paleoconservatism, distributism, or macintyre's communitarianism

>> No.12139342

>>12137732
Yikes

>> No.12139350

>>12137715
Sowell is a living fucking meme though, I mean hes literally a black libertarian.

>> No.12139420

Start with Richard Mongler

>> No.12139485

>>12139295
All based

>> No.12139512

>>12137760
Don't lump that crypto-neo-liberal hack Land in there with the others. Dude is a meth addict psyoping impressionable kids. Worse than Peterson.

>> No.12139791

>>12138952
>Innis invites us instead to consider the formalities of power exerted by these structures in their mutual interaction.
Sounds interesting. Where do I Start?

>> No.12139836

>>12137760
>Spengler
Genius
>Heidegger
Genius
>Gentile
Criminally underrated
>Schmitt
Pretty much the GOAT analyst of the modern political condition
>Evola
Not a philosopher.
>Guenon
Hardly a philosopher and also a retarded orientalist.

>> No.12140219

For me its Toynbee
>The 19 major civilizations, as Toynbee sees them, are:Egyptian,Andean,Sinic,Minoan,Sumerian,Mayan,Indic,Hittite,Hellenic,Western,Orthodox Christian(Russia),Far Eastern,Orthodox Christian(main body),Persian,Arabic,Hindu,Mexican,Yucatec, andBabylonic. There are four "abortive civilizations" (Abortive Far Western Christian, Abortive Far Eastern Christian, AbortiveScandinavian, AbortiveSyriac) and five "arrested civilizations" (Polynesian,Eskimo,Nomadic,Ottoman,Spartan), for a total of 28.

>> No.12140679

>>12137921
You a nazbol (the best ideology)

>> No.12140702

>>12137715
bronze age prevert xD...

>> No.12140725

>>12137917
>nice trolling
>dude
>mad hostility
>tryin'
>faggy
leave and don't come back

>> No.12140889
File: 156 KB, 960x847, logos2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12140889

>Right Wing

>A bunch of Socialist faggots in leather clothes with garden tools and suns as symbols of justice, obsessed with ideologies based on a revenge-porn fantasy mania which leads them to global war and in turn the deaths of the very people they claim to help.

>Liberal faggots who made an entire ideology out of their desire to grab their dick to 18th century lolis after they brutally murdered their own King(s) and destroyed their own culture so a manlet faggot could export this savagery to the rest of the European continent and thus paving the way for the above mentioned leather faggots.

>Occultist devil worshippers who are more interested in LARPing as pajeets and having orgies rather than restoring balance to the universe.

The absolute state of the Right.

>> No.12140908
File: 158 KB, 1280x1706, Alain_de_Benoist.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12140908

Churchill and Alain de Benoist are obligatory

>> No.12141079
File: 60 KB, 472x473, Master-Of-Praxeology.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12141079

The Last Knight of Liberalism is unironically a brilliant man.

>> No.12141091
File: 18 KB, 233x301, denationalization-of-money-Hayek.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12141091

Also Hayek's more serious stuff are worth a go.

>> No.12141121

I really like the distributist, what should i read to get on level with him?

>> No.12141166

>>12137732
>but from what I see this dude is NatSoc
Look again, cretin.

>> No.12141172

Read Camp of the Saints.

>> No.12141215
File: 131 KB, 1024x1001, Junger.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12141215

Junger, not all right-wing reading lists have to be purely philosophy, and SoS is great.

>> No.12142086

>>12137732
Yeah let's just casually forget the fact that he absolutely despised Hitler as an individual and correctly predicted that the Third Reich would be gone within 10 years in 1936.

>> No.12142100
File: 66 KB, 1024x1024, 1540607075058.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12142100

>>12137715
hayek
that's all i got

>> No.12142568

>>12137715
David Friedman
Mises
Moldbug
Johnathon Haidt
Schmitt
Spengler

>> No.12143091

>>12139836
>Not a philosopher.
philosopher is an extremely broad term as guenon points out. There's not much linking nietzche's prophesying with Kant's ontology with Marcus AUrelius'aphorisms, and they're all called philosophers. Evola expounded a view of the world based on traditional doctrines, even if you disagree with him how is he not a philosopher?

also how is guenin an orientalist? didnt he hate those guys?

>> No.12144426

>>12137730
This is sad

>> No.12144433

>reading politics

Pleb

>> No.12144468

Carlyle is who you want.

Yes, he's contemporary in my mind.

>> No.12144632

Greg Johnson's White Nationalist Manifesto just came out and is a must read.

>> No.12144952

>>12138040
Pound's ABC of Reading is incredibly useful if you want to get into high modernism. A lot of his poetry is very difficult but ABC will help you tackle it properly. Also gives you a useful framework for analyzing and writing good literature generally. Highly recommend.

>> No.12144967

>>12137864
>>12137825
They would be right wing by today's standards, which is sad, but back in the day they were leftist as fuck. Remember liberalism in the 18th century was radical and revolutionary. They were the communists of their day and it should be no surprise that these people who were mostly freemasons went on to inspire Marx and all the other leftists of the 20th century.

>> No.12145006
File: 17 KB, 241x209, BASED.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12145006

>>12137825
Based and Redpilled image

>> No.12145041

>>12144632
White Nationalism is retarded, so the manifesto itself is probably stupid.

>> No.12145301

>>12137715
Read Dugin

>> No.12145434

>Can't decide if I'm a Kazscynkian luddite eco-eschatologist or a Landian technognostic
My fear and hatred of technology is only surpassed by my fascination of it and my hatred of women

>> No.12145441

>>12145041
We get it you love brown people

>> No.12145482

>>12137760
Jesus Christ, I hope you retards don't actually read/recommend this
Always makes me laugh when right-wingers grasp for straws because let's face it, there are simply no right wing "intellectuals"

At least Heidegger and Spengler are still somewhat taught in universities

>> No.12145576

>>12145482
If intellectuals all seem to have an affinity for Communism and Communism keeps working out rather poorly, maybe there's something wrong with intellectualism.

>> No.12145587

>>12137715
Carl Schmitt, especially the concept of the political
Alain de Benoist, pretty much everything including his critique of christianity as a precursor for modern liberalism (not only the american definintion where you call socialists liberals and liberal jesus and oil freaks conservatives)
Ernst Jünger, but be aware of his change in thought, his works from the weimar era and what he wrote after WW2 are rather dissimillar
Guillaume faye if you want some weird concepts about the future, but entertaining nevertheless
Jack Donovan - the way of man if you want a baseline critique of modern society that doesnt come from academics but appeals more to your gut. Ignore his other books unless you're a faggot; if so read androphilia.
Tomislav Sunic if you want an overview about genuine right wing critique of western liberalism. Especially the chapter "e pluribus disunitis" from Homo Americanus is splendid. also his essay "Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft: a sociological View", a collaboration with Benoist.
Kuehnelt-Leddihn for catholic free market critique of democracy and genuine reactionary thoughts.
If American, read up in the southern agrarians.
Alinsky is leftist, but extremely important for current right wingers.
The Camp of Saints by Jean raspail is polcore.
Orwell's Essay "politics and the english language". Again, not a rightwinger, but important.
Dostoyevsky's Demons.
Quaddafi's Green book, gives a nice insight into weird mixtures of right, left and islam. But for the love of god don't take him overly serious.
Other memes i havent read though: dugin, Hayek (libertarian), rothbard (libertarian), Strasser (nazbol), Mohler (did an apparentely great doctoral thesis on the german conservative revolution during the interwar period)
Have fun, don't solely read authors who subscribe to the exact same views you do, and branch into corresponding areas like history, economics, philosophy and sociology as needed.

>> No.12145599
File: 72 KB, 768x480, Ayn-Rand-Racism-Collectivism.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12145599

>>12145434
That's all this website has ever really been when you really get down to it.
>>12145482
Fascists want everyone to view the intellectuals they claim as secretly wise yet reasonable people to read no matter how spastic they are. Yet they also want to claim everyone is a Fascist whether they were or advocated it or not. It's terribly embaressing.

>> No.12145604

>>12137715
Ben Shapiro, Tucker Carlson, Ann Coulter, Stefan Molyneux, Jordan Peterson, Lauren Southern
>b-but they aren't dead so what they say might actually be relevant and not about the political climate 200 years ago
so what? there's nothing worse than intellectual elitism. if there's something you want to say and can't say it in 20 words or less, don't say it.

>> No.12145614
File: 112 KB, 700x461, linkola-2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12145614

Pentti Linkola if you want to be scarred for life by the toughest black pill of all.

>> No.12145627

>>12145604
>there's nothing worse than intellectual elitism
Only one thing is: zionist puppets, and you named them all. Why exclude poor ol' Milo?

>> No.12145712

>>12145604
Yeah but he basically said, not e-celeb trash.

>> No.12145723

>>12137715
the only right wing literature that is based in an intellectual tradition and from a respected thinker is all related to monarchies and feudal structures or just reactionary stuff against the idea of industrialization or civilization itself

its a waste of time

>> No.12145743

>>12145723
> the only right wing literature that is based in an intellectual tradition
> and from a respected thinker
> Is all related to monarchies and feudal structures or just reactionary stuff
You what? Seems like you're carving out a very specific box and calling it right-wing.......

>> No.12145882

Why are leftists so sure they have a stranglehold on intellectualism? Why does what they want never happen if that is the case?

>> No.12145917

>>12145723
But that's literally all of the best stuff.

>> No.12145920

>>12145882
>Why does what they want never happen if that is the case?
Europe is getting blacked just fine

>> No.12145939

>>12145882
>Why does what they want never happen if that is the case?
Rotfl

>> No.12145968

>>12145920
>>12145939
I guess you two are right, Perhaps I'm more thinking of their "ultimate" goal of getting rid of capitalism which just seems to be getting stronger. A leftist is never actually pleased even if they are getting much of what they want.

>> No.12145997

>>12139512
wow it's surprising how rare that simple and true analysis is here

>> No.12146080

>>12145482
I have never understood how someone can get this blinded by their ideology.

you may not like the right or left, but to claim the side you disagree with have no intellectuals is just stupid. Why do you choose to throw thinking away and just march like a zealot? It's disappointing on an intellectual level and only speaks to how immature your mind is

>> No.12146300

>>12145968
>I guess you two are right, Perhaps I'm more thinking of their "ultimate" goal of getting rid of capitalism which just seems to be getting stronger. A leftist is never actually pleased even if they are getting much of what they want.
The people screaming for the end of capitalism and the death of the bourgeoisie are on the payroll of the people they want to kill in most cases.

>> No.12146418

>>12145614
>the toughest black pill of all.
You can't just say that and not tell us what it is

>> No.12146766

>>12146300
But there is nothing conservative in capitalism. It's liberal by definition and in practice.

>> No.12146777

>>12146766
>But there is nothing conservative in capitalism. It's liberal by definition and in practice.
That's what I'm saying.

>> No.12146785

>>12141121
Menscius Moldbug and G K Chesterton, of course.

>> No.12146793

>>12137715
is that david ruffin?

>> No.12146800
File: 27 KB, 333x499, conservative mind.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12146800

Nobody's gonna post Russell Kirk? At all?

>> No.12146858

>>12146766
Conservatism simply means to conserve,whatever becomes the new tradition becomes the conservative. That's why conservatives of a hundred years ago are called reactionary today.

>> No.12146903

>>12146858
>whatever becomes the new tradition becomes the conservative
That's disingenuous. Anything "new" is progressive and subverts tradition. Neocons' Stockholm Syndrome relationship with capitalism is precisely why they are incapable of conserving anything.

>> No.12146924

>>12146903
Yeah it doesn't matter what sort of semantics game you wanna play that's how term is used. The conservative of tomorrow is the liberal of yesterday. You're better off calling yourself traditionalist republican or whatever system you wish to return to rather than conservative.

>> No.12146933

>>12146903
The word itself presupposes coexistence with Progressivism which, as of now, is more or less undefeated.

>> No.12147018

Peter Hitchens

>> No.12147022

>>12137715
Wasn't there an American mulatto fascist? Go with him he was based. If only I could remember his name...

>> No.12147115
File: 26 KB, 380x349, 1542063437780.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12147115

>>12137715
This board really needs to get off their high horse about his "e-celeb" shit. Its a new way of communicating and its not going anywhere. If any of the older writers listed in this thread were alive to day, the ones who weren't making their own content would at least be going on podcasts and it would be based. Quit being pic related

>> No.12147799
File: 124 KB, 600x677, moshimoshima.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12147799

Mishima Yukio might tick a few of your boxes if you're a right wing closeted homo.

>> No.12149484
File: 88 KB, 907x1360, 61JzCeHTybL.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12149484

Bill Buckley

>> No.12149534
File: 285 KB, 907x1360, 81qtUFFci-L.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12149534

>>12137715
Read Anonymous Conservative and weep.

>> No.12149601
File: 91 KB, 920x537, WFBJr2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12149601

>>12137715
Depends on how explicit you mean. Sowell is an economist, and his positions aren’t inherently political. They are just held generally by one side of the political spectrum. I wouldn’t say that makes him right-wing explicitly.
If you’re using such a soft definition, I’d recommend >Walter Williams
>C.S. Lewis
>Larry Arnn
>Rudyard Kipling
>G.K. Chesterton
>J.R.R. Tolkien
>William J. Bennett
>Victor Davis Hanson
>Winston Churchill
>William F. Buckley Jr.
>Ayn Rand
I would say all of them have serious merit and fall solidly on the political Right by your standards.

>> No.12149637
File: 1.10 MB, 3052x3884, Churchill.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12149637

>>12137809
>Churchill
>not right-wing
What are you on?

>> No.12150026

>>12138403
No he isn't, that's the very definition of progressivism--a well defined liberal elitist political movement begun in the early 20th century and coming to its catastrophic conclusion shortly.

>> No.12150037

>>12145041
Johnson wrote it for the "general" White audience, but it is still by no means a stupid book. It is the product of decades of refining arguments in favor of White Nationalism. If you can refute any of his points, please publish them and give him the opportunity to respond. I guarantee you cannot do it.

>> No.12150048

>>12145587
Good recommendations. Have you taken the Klages pill yet?

>> No.12150770
File: 24 KB, 329x499, The-Libertarian-Mind_David-Boaz.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12150770

>>12146800
Kek, I'm assuming the anti IP crowd copied Kirk and not the other way around. I might give it a read and compare the two.

>> No.12150775

>>12147115
>its not going anywhere
Yes it is, it's just a temporary internet fad much like the picture you posted.

>> No.12151032

>>12147799
I was going to say this. Yukio Mishima is right wing but it plays out in really interesting ways in his work (it's less about politics than it is about honour) and his writing is absolutely beautiful.

>> No.12151043
File: 497 KB, 1400x2172, 817Bh0CTHxL.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12151043

Mark Levin

>> No.12151067
File: 301 KB, 600x936, productimage-picture-diary-of-a-man-in-despair-317_c7dc4b20-6599-48b2-b524-87fd847e8ea1_1024x1024.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12151067

based conservative critique of nazism

>> No.12151086
File: 650 KB, 1520x2344, 91M4vTEYwmL.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12151086

>>12151067
literally a paean to monarchism

>> No.12151089

>>12137921
That's literally the definition of third-positionism

>> No.12151903

>>12137760
peterson is a leftist

>> No.12152743

Can someone here link me Kissinger's thesis? I didn't see another relevant thread to ask in.

>> No.12153783
File: 126 KB, 647x656, 1538342103578.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12153783

>>12137825
HOLY FUCK GUYS HEGEL WAS RIGHT

>> No.12153802

>>12137751
He isn't a neo-con if anything his ideals translated politically would be something with less government intervention in the markets, not more. He can't stand politicans

>> No.12155340

>>12137715
Strauss

>> No.12155771

>>12145604
Cringe and bluepilled
Not that I don't follow ano of them, but really, what do you thinks most of them do? They read old authors you absolute nigger

>> No.12155955

Voegelin, I love when right wingers go down the deep end.

>> No.12155961

>>12137715
Mike Cernovich

>> No.12156014

>>12145599
God Ayn Rand was a stupid cunt

>> No.12156034

>>12156014
Yeah I'm glad she'd dead

>> No.12156165

>>12156014
She's spot on though. You either judge people by their actual character and actions or you judge them by other measures that might not fit who they actually are and what they actually do, actions being the things that carry true moral content. (no matter how statistically likely some trend is, western civilization was built off of ideas like innocent until proven guilty)

>> No.12156305

>>12156014
She was unironically right about everything. Made a joke out of both commies and trads.

>> No.12156420

>>12137715
>obscure manuscripts from 300 years ago.
Yeah. Why would a good order, which is the right's vision, have to change? It's the left which must reinvent itself daily.

>> No.12156472
File: 112 KB, 220x331, Tragedy_And_Hope_By_Carroll_Quigley.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12156472

>>12137715
Carroll Quigley, though it's kind of hard to call him a conservative. He's more like a historian who unapologetically loves the elite superstructure of the world. He also has a way of reducing entire cultural histories into mere paragraphs in a way that would make a modern day scholar blush.

That said, everything he wrote was dead accurate and he is definitely one of the best historians of the 20th century.

>> No.12157352
File: 287 KB, 1400x2100, 81oWv1eyHxL.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12157352

Dan Bongino