/lit/ - Literature

>>12118125
ressentiment of the bottom half

>>12118125
As long as politicians exist this will be impossible.

>>12118125
>average IQ of 130
Woah like imagine dude...

>>12118150
How much longer do you think politicians will exist? I give them fifty years absolute MAX before they're unrecognizable to us.

Why is this on /lit/? I'd imagine eugenics belong on the science board, >>>/sci/

>all females who have ever had a child practiced eugenics
What retard wrote this? It's natural selection, the complete opposite of eugenics. Natural selections reinforces humanity's submission to the tides of evolution, eugenics imply taking control of them.

>>12118178
eugenic is self-optimizing natural selection

>>12118178
>>12065105

>>12118125
because the notion of managing a society is mostly an ideological one with very little real substance. the managers who enact policy don't have nearly the reach to be able to improve the lives of the very poorest in order to make them stop fucking and breeding out of boredom and despair. you've been raised to have unrealistic ideas of what the government is capable of because of the managerial ideology.

if it's really that easy, why would you need to criminalize anything? why not just give "incentives" for people to stop committing crimes? yeah, that's obviously ridiculous, but it's ridiculous in exactly the same way that stopping people from breeding with incentives is ridiculous. namely because it's an unimplementable policy, on account of the fact that it would require a kind of control over basic natural incentives that even the most dystopic managerial societies don.t have.

i cant blame people for thinking this way, but it's an unrealistic view of the capabilities of the state, caused by people buying into social scientists' propaganda about what kinds of social management are possible.

anachronistic aristocratic thinking
imagine unironically believing millionaire vine stars and fucking twitch streamers are of high quality genetic stock because they aren't poorfags. suck my black dick.

>>12118334
They wouldn’t ideally be the people being selected as breeders.

>>12118162
They will be replaced by something much worse: imams

>>12118125
>females are eugenicsts
Females are dysgenicists, really.

>>12118125
he tried but they wouldn't let him

>>12118208
So gattaca won't ever happen n shee?
sheeeii

>>12118125
Does that mean you volunteer to be part of those not allowed to breed ?

>>12118481
Yeah, what now.

>>12118481
>Does that mean you volunteer to be part of those not allowed to breed ?
In a heartbeat, also could I ask for painless and fairly quick euthanasia administered by an attractive soothing girl if possible? Probably by injection or bolt to the head like cattle

>>12118481
I already decided not to breed.

>>12118125
>130iq retard
Hahahaha there are so many 130iqlet who think they are intelligent, when in reality, the smartest people look down upon them like we would look down on a toiling nigger.

funny how the biggest advocates for eugenics seem to be the chaff it would sort out. I don't blame you fellas, if I could spare someone in the future my crippling inferiority complex, why not?

>>12118353
who's gonna be doing the "selecting?" how do you ensure the selectors are good enough to select responsibly? who selects the selectors?

>>12118575
>if I could spare someone in the future my crippling inferiority complex, why not?
Who is this someone? You mean a child who you somehow manage to father and inevitably fail who is imprinted with the inferiority complex or just any random stranger you meet who has the misfortune to know how much of a pathetic loser the person talking to them is?

>>12118178
I usually impute some conscious agency to women but maybe I'm not misogynistic enough to be posting here.

>>12118208
>if it's really that easy, why would you need to criminalize anything? why not just give "incentives" for people to stop committing crimes?
uh, criminal law theory has considered the general dissuasion of criminal behaviour to be one of the functions of penal law since like the nineteenth century

>>12118634
people born on the lower end of the totem pole. i'm one of them. I know what it's like. ressentiment isn't really an option anymore when you know what you're missing and why those who have it are successful, i'd gladly accept gene editing if it weeds out the chaff

>>12118167

But it always has been a pseudo science.

It's already happening check out Danish downs birthrates, they're all being aborted. (I'd do the same in a heartbeat)

https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/population-by-country/
poo
poo nigger

>>12118125
China is in the early stages and will reach intelligence acceleration escape velocity while christcucks and leftists in the west are still whining about ethics.

>>12119005
oh god please let this happen

>>12119023
See the eternal Anglo response to Chinese embryo selection:

>Such systematic efforts raise thorny questions for bioethicists. Some worry that pushes to eliminate disabilities devalue the lives of those who already have them.

>Such efforts, for hearing loss in particular, can seem jarring because many people in the West do not consider it a problem to be avoided. In the United States, some deaf couples have used PGD to select for congenital deafness, in an effort to preserve Deaf culture.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/chinas-embrace-of-embryo-selection-raises-thorny-questions/

The west doesn't stand a chance.

>>12119068
>In the United States, some deaf couples have used PGD to select for congenital deafness, in an effort to preserve Deaf culture.
That should be a fucking crime. People who knowingly choose to have a retarded kid should not get a single piece of welfare fire anything related to that fucker.

the problem is too complex for human beings to solve

>>12119101
If you were to try to design one perfect type of human, yes. But there's nothing wrong with wiping out downies or Somalians or something like that in the mean time.

Average IQ would still be 100.

>>12119068
I hope the Chinese wipe us all out. The Aryan will return in the end through genetic engineering and take it all back and the world will eventually be a homogenous, autonomous community of Uber-spiritual Chads spreading Jesus throughout the universe.

>>12119128
He implies now days 130 would be the 100 of then.

>>12118481
If I'm allowed to adopt then yes.

>>12119091
>deaf = retarded
kek
I agree with you that it should be a crime though

>>12119145
fairly negligible differences in function between the two (long term)

~145 average is where we really get cooking

>>12119516
It doesn’t matter as soon as we can edit genes responsible for intelligence

>>12118185
No it’s not. Rethink this.

>>12118185
>what's best for humanity = what's best for the preservation of humanity
alright, pal

OP's pic related contains a wild obvious blatant hilarious falsehood and is completely nonsensical nonsequiturs one after another

Self-evidently this is the MOST dysgenic age.

>mom could only afford the brainlet gene pack

anyone with any real sense of how technology works knows that eugenics through gene manipulation is going to cause more problems than it solves. sure, you guys might be satisfied with moderate intelligence increases for each generation, and having more attractive children than you otherwise would have. thats great! but i promise you fuckers are going to be singing a different tune when you have genetically engineered slave classes, kids born as furries, and other monstrosities that i'm too lazy to think of right now

>>12119854
>what is regulation

>>12118572
>we

>>12119860

can't keep the cat in the bag forever

>>12119886
Increasing intelligence or removing the gene that contributes to obesity is much easier than adding things that humans don’t have or something abstract like obedience or aggressiveness. Besides, it’s not as if the low-lives will have control over the research. Why would the scientists want to figure out how to add cat ears? No, they will most likely only focus on removing objectively negative factors like diseases and increasing positive factors like intelligence, weight, etc.

>>12119138
agreed

>>12119138
Neo-China will come from the future, Gnon willing.

sterilize all humans
artificially inseminate people using bone marrow
forced adoption of clone babies
2150

>>12118125
The Lord your God already beat you by a few thousand years goy

>>12119909

>Increasing intelligence or removing the gene that contributes to obesity is much easier than adding things that humans don’t have or something abstract

this is according to...?

>Why would the scientists want to figure out how to add cat ears?

money? government propaganda turned into reality? i'm sure you wouldn't waste your time with it, but that whole plastic surgery industry makes a few dollars. you just said yourself that the obesity gene(s) would be a target, why not other things?

>No, they will most likely only focus on removing objectively negative factors

this implies that the people in charge want the best for everyone, which couldn't be the case if the whole point of the technology is designed to accelerate biological competition.

>>12118125
>dude having sex is eugenics, so the next logical step is to legalize all eugenics