[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 47 KB, 256x256, 4AF9A322-0D6C-44FB-855F-DD1B15D77FD7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12043023 No.12043023[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

https://youtube.com/watch?v=K6YG6Fuoq64

>> No.12043028

>>12043023
that is literally butterfly the tripfag

>> No.12043036

>>12043028
>butterfly
is she on cuckchan as well?

>> No.12043046

petercuck btfo

>> No.12043047

she is smart and caught peterson out in a few moments but im still not impressed by her

>> No.12043049

>>12043023
this is actually an interesting exchange

good on her for prodding him a bit, makes him more interesting

>> No.12043053

>>12043023
"You don't need an ideology."

unironically based

>> No.12043061

>What do you think I think about transgender issues?

>You probably think gender is a social construct

>NOooPE!
>It's largely, but not entirely socially constructed!
>got u

not even a petersonfag but fuck this cunt

>> No.12043096
File: 55 KB, 702x520, 1540197485611.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12043096

>>12043023
>leftists are so buttblasted by Peterson that they're willing to accept a basic bitch neoliberal that looks like Shrek as "their girl"

>> No.12043102

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=apNQDNKjWCI&feature=youtu.be

>> No.12043148

>>12043023
I'm tired of people I know asking me about Peterson and what I think of him. Like they're expecting me to justify some random thing he said about trannydildos in classrom or something but then act surprised when I tell them he's controlled opposition ZOG shill that denounces racism and remains silent on the JQ.

>> No.12043154

>>12043023
I don't know who this fat bitch is but it doesn't change the fact that Peterson is a generic neocon who just happens to use the language of a leftist intellectual

>> No.12043203

Has Peterson ever lost a debate?

>> No.12043206

>>12043203
No, because he learned how to split hairs in talmud school together with ben shapiro and steven spielberg.

>> No.12043211

>>12043203
no because "I would need to spend some time looking into that"

>> No.12043217

>>12043206
Cringe

>> No.12043250

>>12043217
>t. /r/The_ZOGnald

>> No.12043256

>>12043047
Caught him out on what?

>> No.12043289

>>12043023

why does he change his voice to sound less like kermit

>> No.12043303

Is this Claude Levi-Strauss' s argument for the existence of patriarchy?

>> No.12043366

>>12043023
how can a man be so void of intelligence? she's isn't even great debater and he isn't even able to response anything nor listen to her. jeez
does anyone consider this piece of shit a philosopher? i'm not even talking about right-wing shit and left-wing shit, he's just empty and superficial, he can't think much less than a stupid 13 teenager.
if this is a philosopher, then we're doomed in this century

>> No.12043396

>>12043023
Yes. how cringeworthy seeing peterson btfo so badly that he has to start Atwood bashing. Dude is a complete pseud, can’t wait til he loses all him influence for being exposed as a hack.

>> No.12043424

>>12043366
only people unversed in philosophy claimed peterson as a philosopher for our time

peterson himself seems a bit more self-important after spending time in the public eye, but would probably balk at being called a philosopher

>> No.12043426

>>12043049
cringe

>> No.12043482

>>12043023
Fuck no.

Good Lord was she annoying.

>> No.12044603

>>12043023
he's such a smug fuck since becoming a cult leader

>> No.12044658

>>12043061
This l m a o

>> No.12044661

>>12043028
lol

butterfly looked like egoraptor

>> No.12044679
File: 178 KB, 1024x1024, contemplating crow.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12044679

>>12043023
Helen Lewis
>lets her opponent make his point
>stays polite
>makes her points calmly

Jordan Peterson
>keeps interruptiong
>constantly insults his opponent
>gets agitated and talks in run-on sentences

>> No.12044688

>He calls her an NPC.

Based. Peterson 'won' the exchange if that's what you want to call it, but she was a decent interviewer.

I have kind of stopped caring about JBP but after listening to the interview it reminds me how fucking incredible of a speaker he is. I wish I could talk so eloquenty and make so many pithy statements.

>> No.12044689

I’d rape her in the ass if you infer what it saying but she has that entitled vibe going on. My nigga Jordan rekt her

>> No.12044696

>>12043203
Yes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmH7JUeVQb8&list=PLZU1NdVSGzhgPj61h8C_V03WtzIUiB62p&index=2&t=0s

>> No.12044707

Sometimes I wonder how all this feels from Peterson's perspective
I mean all this started just from him bee'n himself and just talking about his ideas randomly
But now it's like everyone wants to take a shot at him like he's a big walking target
But it's not like he can back down otherwise everyone will call him out for it so now he just has to do things like this
Is this just what having different ideas from the accepted norm gets you these days?
I imagine it's kind of stressful
I wonder if he's making enough extra money that it's worth it
Honestly if it were me I might've just gone right back to my teaching job and forgot all this nonsense

>> No.12044747

>>12043023
FUCK WHITE PEOPLE AND PATRIARCHY WE WANT ISLAM AND AFRICAN AMERICANS WHO WILL KEEP US IN CHAINS

>> No.12044751

>>12044696
Getting destroyed by some rando atheist activist is truly embarassing.

>> No.12044807 [DELETED] 

>>12043023
>hey /pol/ refugees and Christian larpers, what do you say to a self-proclaimed feminist and social democrat?
the science should be clear on this one anon.

>> No.12044833

>>12044707
I bet it feels lucrative

>> No.12044891

>>12044747
Also muh dick

>> No.12044915

>>12044707
He could have simply gone back to his teaching job and waited for the controversy to blow over, but he deliberately courted attention and fame. He immediately went on tour as a speaker, took on numerous interviews, opened a Patreon, started writing a new book, and started new lecture series. He dove straight into this lifestyle.

>> No.12044971

>>12044707
>I wonder if he's making enough extra money that it's worth it

He is making insane amounts of money. Like rapper-tier cash.

>> No.12044975

>>12043023
no

>> No.12045000

>>12044679
This. I think that Peterson is usually fairly respectful during debates, but here he was pretty combative, while Lewis kept her cool even when Peterson was flinging out ad hominems. I don't agree with her on some issues but I think Peterson wasn't as classy as he usually is.

>> No.12045089

Stop posting your channel. Also, that vid is crijngey as fuck. Please stop capitalizing MEME BULLSHIT, its literally "BEN SHAPIRO DESTROYS EPIC SNOWFLAKE LIBTART" tier.

>> No.12045121
File: 52 KB, 658x463, Dl2NboPUwAAAVLF.jpg large.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12045121

Looks like Jordan's been on the cider again.

>> No.12045138
File: 230 KB, 608x380, anna.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12045138

Will JP do the debate?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Hg3hdAUAPs

>> No.12045142

>>12044679

Helen Lewis is a fucking basedboy who probably eats veggies. Jordan is a true meat-eating alpha male who refuses to even acknowledge anything green — including jealousy, you resentful leftist tarantulas.

>> No.12045173

Jordan Peterson is an incredible psychologist, people somehow act surprised when he gets beaten on other topics.

>> No.12045255

based & redpilled

>> No.12046038

>>12043047
>>12043256
>this

She didn't catch him out on anything.
All she did was barely manage to keep up. Which is more than can be said for most people, but still...

>> No.12046042

>>12043206
Grasping@straws.org

>> No.12046049

>>12045173
Like what?

>> No.12046077

>>12045121
JBP is severely mentally ill

>> No.12046361

>>12043023
>Why do women change their names on marriage traditionally?
>... ... ... I don’t know, exactly, why do you think they do
lmao is this edited?

>> No.12046393

>>12043023
Is he drunk?

>> No.12046406

>>12043023
She got blown the fuck out.

>> No.12046412

What happened to this board, why do we talk about pseudo intellectuals

>> No.12046415

>>12043023
>What do I think of transgender issues then, HUH?
>Probably that it's a social construct
>WRONG, I only think it's 90% a social construct
So this is the power of leftism.

>> No.12046417

>>12046412
but we don't discuss Zizek anymore

>> No.12046424

How do people justify Petersons "interpretation" of Nietzsche

>> No.12046425

>>12045173
Are you insinuating he somehow lost the argument in the OP video? It's comically one sided in Peterson's favor, which speaks volumes about who he chooses to argue with, it's the equivalent of /pol/ harassing some schizophrenic trannies youtube and claiming victory when they have a breakdown. You're picking on some of the most irrational, even mentally disturbed people out there, instead of taking your ideas which are demonstrably retarded, and vetting them against anyone with an iota of understanding or ability in something you dare call "public discourse".

>> No.12046435

>>12044696
>expecting anyone to watch a 2 hour video on atheism
Can you just specify when Peterson loses? I don't want to listen to some fedora tipper for half the day.

>> No.12046446

>>12045000
>>12044679
That's because the clip is taken in the middle of a long talk where she basically denies evolutionary fact repeatedly. Anyone would get irritated dealing with that kind of person. How do you argue with someone who doesn't want to present or accept arguments logically?

>> No.12046525

>>12043023
"Name your favorite author."
"Dostoevsky."
"Name your favorite female author."
"..."

>> No.12046533

>>12043203
Yes, David Benatar BTFO Bederson

>> No.12046539

>I wear makeup because society judges me if I don't.

How dishonest can you be? Just say you like wearing it, just like Petersson likes wearing fancy suits.

>YOU DON'T KNOW MY VIEWS HURR

The fact that lit shills this retard out of spite for Peterson, shouldn't be expected I guess.

>> No.12046580

>>12044696
HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHHAHA
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAHAA
AHAHAHHAAHAHHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

36:50
>Dillahunty: "When people say to me... 'If we go down the road with Dostoevsky, if there is no God, everything is permissible.' First of all I don't think that's remotely true..."
>Peterson: "Well, he makes a vicious case for it in Beyond Good and Evil."
>doesn't correct himself

>> No.12046587

>>12043023
She's below average looking and looks very manly. I'm not surprised that such an ugly, man looking woman is a feminist.

>> No.12046604

>>12043203
Didn't he get rekt by that one comedian?

>> No.12046619
File: 301 KB, 874x810, Untitled-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12046619

who was in the wrong here?

>> No.12046645
File: 25 KB, 480x480, 18342674_1121288447971096_8810298847116568183_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12046645

>>12046619
women are never right anon

>> No.12046654

>>12046619
Based Madame Wallström fighting ZOG like a ture NatSoc, she's literally /ourgirl/.

>> No.12046688

She was only able to make Peterson appear like the most enlightened individual to walk this Earth.

Seriously, she couldn't make a single good point. One.

>> No.12046727

>>12045121
jordan speak only what is true and meaningful peterson

>> No.12046729

>>12043023
>I wear makeup because society judges me if I don't.
Yes; and why's that, sweetie? Why can't these people just admit that makeup was invented to make women appear more attractive by piggybacking on evolutionary cues for fertility (youth, symmetry, lack of blemishes etc.)? Peterson remains unscathed.

>> No.12046733

>>12046654
>shat on israel
>shat on saudi arabia
She's pretty funny.

>> No.12046736

What level of chapo trap house do you need to be on to think that a MSM type like this who supports political correctness and hatespeech laws (but "supports free speech") can outthink anyone with a brain? Her main tactic was baiting him in to saying slightly politically incorrect things.

Peterson's main tactic is to stray ever so slightly in to politically incorrect territory to bait the intolerant leftists in to going after him.

When it comes to "postmodern Marxism" or whatever, his main tactic seems to be to swing the bat at a group that intentionally stays nebulous, which causes butthurt. The main response online has been people saying "But define postmodernism!" without them defining it themselves.

>> No.12046742

Wearing make up is the same thing as Tom Cruise wearing heels

>> No.12046744

>>12046733
I know, white nationalism is a zog psyop, if you really want to save the white race, you have to support leftist politicians.