/lit/ - Literature

>>11833002
He was weak and scared

>>11833002
He was a homosexual jew, what did you expect.

>>11833002
enemy of mysticism

>>11833023
anon...

>>11833010
You can't just call everyone with like one vaguely Jewish grandparent Jewish. If you did that like 50% of the population would probably be Jewish. Most of those Ashkenazim are basically just Polish Sicilian Khazars anyways. Besides, homosexuality isn't real

>>11833148
Um no. Jewishness is a genetic sickness and even quarter jews (see Tim Wise) are not immune from its destructive effects.

>>11833148
Kek.
Weak ass faggot kikes have to resort to semantic. True Aryans see through the semantics. True Aryans can see the lifeforce and energy in all matter. True Aryans are like Neo. This is why the Jew plays little number games to confuse the wayward Aryan.

>>11833148
>Besides, homosexuality isn't real
it is a biological fact

>>11833157
biology's fake

>>11833148
>Besides, homosexuality isn't real
based

>>11833157
Can you show me the genes that make someone a homosexual? Can you prove those genes make certain sexual acts involuntary? If not then so called "homosexuals" are not categorically different from regular people and are simply hedonists who dislike women

>>11833153
Get out of here, you anti-semant.

>>11833171
>Can you show me the genes that make someone a homosexual?
The ones your daddy passed onto you kek

>>11833208
kek

>>11833214
And how could my daddy have me if he was a homo sexual?
hmm...

>>11833171
>Can you show me the genes that make someone a homosexual?
Not sure if high quality troll or absolute brainlet.

>>11833220
Because he didnt have the balls to come out and decided to marry a woman instead.

>>11833002
a lot of suicides in his family, iirc. don't know what you're referring to as "his problem" though.

>>11833220
Mishima has kids

>>11833460
You know DAMN well. Either that or you're a retard.

>>11833148
>vaguely jewish

The Wittgenstein were a Rothschild tier Jewish oligarch dynasty laddo

>>11833153
Based

>>11833153
Reminds me of Twilight of the Idols:

>With Socrates, Greek taste changes in favor of logical argument. What really happened there? Above all, a noble taste is vanquished; with dialectics the plebs come to the top. Before Socrates, argumentative conversation was repudiated in good society: it was considered bad manners, compromising. The young were warned against it. Furthermore, any presentation of one's motives was distrusted. Honest things, like honest men, do not have to explain themselves so openly. What must first be proved is worth little. Wherever authority still forms part of good bearing, where one does not give reasons but commands, the logician is a kind of buffoon: one laughs at him, one does not take him seriously. Socrates was the buffoon who got himself taken seriously: what really happened there?

>One chooses logical argument only when one has no other means. One knows that one arouses mistrust with it, that it is not very persuasive. Nothing is easier to nullify than a logical argument: the tedium of long speeches proves this. It is a kind of self-defense for those who no longer have other weapons. Unless one has to insist on what is already one's right, there is no use for it. The Jews were argumentative for that reason; Reynard the Fox also — and Socrates too?

>>11833148
If you counted everyone with a Jewish grandparent as Jewish, there would be 23 million Jews, only 8 million more than there are self-identifying Jews

>>11833002
No one has mentioned anything about his writing. None of you have read him and just want to shit post. Embarrassing

>>11833002
Why would you do that when you could just tell Hitler the secrets of the atomic bomb?