/lit/ - Literature

>>11813299
>Why is it being memed in this board so much?
It hasn't been memed for months. I think it became a bannable offense to spam these.

Hello author.

>>11813301
I have tried to find reviews of it aswell, but I can't find any

>>11813303
That's because no one has actually read it.

>>11813303
buy the book and write a review

>>11813304
that's not true. 70-80 bookfags have purchased BAS.

>>11813301
some anons want to discuss the book and so they create threads...but the moderators are fucking assholes that don't want certain books discussed on this very special literature board.
go figure.

>>11813319
There's a world of difference between "purchased" and "read", and then an additional threshold of at least equal difficulty in actually reviewing it.

>>11813334
have you read it?

>>11813299
Make me an audiobook already

>>11813352
i'm thinking about it. i'd like to get an elfish sounding woman to do all the VO narration.

>>11813354
It's gona be worth it. Don't take to long.

Somebody atleast post a summary of this shit

>>11813381
No one can be told what Behead All Satans is. You have to see it for yourself.

most likely the author self-promoting his own shit

fuck off back to amazon e-publishing

>>11813398
Is such a thing even possible? Ayyyy

>>11813390
so it's even worse than "Empress Theresa"? that puts it firmly in the region of Shit That Is So Bad It's Not Even Ironically Funny.

>>11814134
I think Behead All Satans is a pretty cool book. eh has words and doesn't afraid of indented paragraphs.

>>11813381
It's insidious and hateful, is openly racist, sexist, misogynistic, sizeist, ableist, xenophobic, anti-Semitic, Islamophobic, homophobic, transphobic, and it glorifies, and in many instances even encourages: psychosexual behavior, violence, stalking, torture, rape, necrophilia, paedophilia, and the casual, ritualistic murder of animals and humans and the wanton destruction of inanimate objects

>>11814276
Great, that sounds just up my alley. I guess I'll have to read it then.

>>11813299
I really like the cover. It's a work of art in itself. I don't want to read the book cause I don't want to ruin the illusion.

Is this the book equivalent of that album you get banned for mentioning?

this shit is like the new sincerity yahoo news comment section

>>11814276
you forgot that "it's a solid good time of reading," you deep diving sonofabitch!

>>11814297
remind us again?

>>11814290
do it

>>11814308
Low energy post. Try again.