/lit/ - Literature

Technically they all suck but there are little funny parts that stand out

>>11806903
None of them because collaborative writing is lame.

>>11806903
I think we only have those three
Though i guarantee you that Hypersphere is shit; it has my stuff in it

>>11807139
There are two sequels to Tundra and Pictures of DFW, but they are not on the level of the /lit/ meme trilogy

>>11807277
exactly

>>11807291
Nonfiction is for plebs and meme wolf isn't edgy enough.

>>11806903
tundra is definitely not worth reading, its incoherent but not funny

>>11807291
>>11807333
does behead all satans have a plot to follow or is it a "post modern" meme like everything else in this thread. yes i'm aware i'm probably replying to the author just shilling it here as usual

>>11807333
so what does that leave?

>>11807835
author here. it starts with a recognizable narrative and then descends into pants on head.

>>11807843
at what stage does it descend to pants on head? like 90% of the way through? 50%?

>>11807867
page 102. so about 1/3 of the way through is where the descent begins.

>>11807886
alright i'll give it a shot. keep up the hustle m8

>>11807898
thank you!

>>11807835
I'm the guy who posted the second image (not the author) and I'd say it's mostly a coherent narrative in journal entry form for roughly half to 75% of the book then there are several nonlinear fake-out endings for the last fourth or so.

>>11808504
Roberto?

>>11808526
Yes.

That edition of Third Rail is actually the first proof. The text on the cover is positioned differently in the final version.

>>11807837
The Greeks but not the plebby ones.

>>11808580
why did you choose to go with double spacing?

>>11808745
Impatience and a general distaste for editing.

I realized it looked crappy after the fact but figured I'd keep it that way because the sloppiness of the work is a key element due to it being my first attempt at a novel and how manic the two month process of writing it was. There's even a twist at the end in there as a joke about how amateurish it must look.

>>11806903
This review is probably the best that came from any of it.

>>11808801
>tfw fail

>>11808803
Lindsay's not fooling anyone. She was into it. kek kek

>>11808771
>the two month process of writing
from 1st draft to final?

>>11808825
There was only one real draft which I only proofread for unintended errors (I'm sure I still somehow missed some) and slightly touched up. I'd only consider a second draft to be something which involves major revisions.

Also, just to set the record straight regarding postmodern memes as mentioned in that one post above, it's not random at all. The core concept was that it was to be a book about death. The would-be protagonist dies in the prologue and the rest of the characters, most with one chapter apiece named after them in a manner resembling headstones, are influenced by that death in one way or another. There was a lot more thought put into it than the format may suggest.

>>11808803
this is honestly what makes it all worth it to me
we actually got some retarded pleb to read our meme book

Reminder that the kindle edition of pic related is currently free.

https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B0793P8GW4

bump

>>11809609
that's a pretty gud deal.

>>11809549
I wonder if My Twisted World is on goodreads.

>>11811533
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/22318033-my-twisted-world?from_search=true

>>11811814
Nice. The rating is surprisingly high for a normie site but I guess these kinds of "artifacts" have pop culture appeal if only due to being taboo.