[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 89 KB, 177x201, 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11716587 No.11716587[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

I DIDN'T KISS HIM, YOU'RE BETTER THAN HIM
GIVE HIM MY NUMBER TOO
I LIKE YOUR SHIRT. CAN I JUST FEEL YOU?

DO YOU DO ANYTHING WITH DUDES? SORRY IF YOU'RE OFFENDED
YOU'RE A SUCKER, I BET THE LADIES LOVE YOU
TEXT ME
YOU'RE A BABY
$10 TAB
SHOW HER YOUR BUTT
THIS GUY TALKS TO EVERYBODY
THIS IS THE COOLEST DUDE I'VE EVER MET
ADD ME ON SNAPCHAT
I'M INTO ANAL
DO YOU WANT TO GO SOMEWHERE WITH ME
THANK YOU FOR WALKING ME TO THE BATHROOM
I THOUGHT YOU WERE COMING HOME WITH US
HELP ME
HELP ME

>> No.11716600

>>11716587
What is this from

>> No.11717066

>>11716600
I don't know what this is, but young Katie Holmes was extremely cute.

>> No.11717085

>I'M INTO ANAL
Hnnnnnnnnngh

>> No.11717098

God I unironically love women

>> No.11717114

>>11716587
what was the name of that tripfag who used to post everything in all caps. I miss their crazy autistically savant ramblings (last time I saw them post was probably 5 years ago).

>> No.11717121

>>11717114
Iranian pipebomb or some shit? Or mundus munialus retard

>> No.11717236

>>11717114
I see him all the time. Maybe he posts more on other boards, I dunno.
But no, I'm pretty sure I saw him on /lit/ yesterday or something.

>> No.11717246

>>11717236
That's CUNT

>> No.11717331

>>11717246
So there's been more than one all-caps tripfag? I'm not really too well versed in tripfag history

>> No.11717352

>>11717331
Well, besides RY there was a guy who would post in all-caps but without a trip a while back. Most people here are too new to remember the latter. He was back in the Brownbear and Deep&Edgy days.

>> No.11717646

>>11717352
I only really started browsing /lit/ in 13 or 14, so I may be too new.

>> No.11717693

>>11717352
Kek, anyone else remember those Brownbear threads were it would be a greentext story of a girl trying to hit on him and him rejecting her because of her shit taste in literature

>> No.11717701

>>11717693
funny shit.
Or Satan dropping into a thread just to shit on D&E for being clueless on Kant.

I feel shame for remembering and posting this

>> No.11717740
File: 459 KB, 720x1280, 1533604489321.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11717740

>>11717098

Why? OP is an unapologetic whore with no shame. She should be burned alive.

>> No.11717750

>>11717740
They're nice. I like them.

>> No.11717764
File: 274 KB, 680x585, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11717764

>>11717701
*psk*
*siiiiip*
Ah, a fellow oldfag, I see. I too enjoy reminiscing on the good old days.
>there are people posting right now who don't remember Quentin
These newfags don't even know the meaning of cringe, eh fellow oldfag?

>> No.11717768
File: 27 KB, 400x413, yooje.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11717768

>>11717693
The best time to browse /lit/.
Everyone hated each other's guts and had to make an effort to out-compete each other's e-peen stroking.
We hated it then, would probably still hate it if it came back, but this is my roundabout way of saying I have always hated this board of literary purgatory.

>> No.11717770

>>11717740
>>>/Pol/

>> No.11717771
File: 58 KB, 500x624, 76094a4add6d846d86bf3395461ec8c4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11717771

>>11717750
Well, I guess living in denial is, if nothing else, complacently pleasurable.

>> No.11717772

>>11717085
> GIVE HIM MY NUMBER TOO
> NUMBER TOO
> NUMBER TWO
> POO IN LOO

Don't do it anon, it's a trap!

>> No.11717773

>>11717770

Sorry, I'm not very involved with politics.

>> No.11717775

>>11717771
What have they really ever done that's worse than men building this entire hellscape though?

>> No.11717779
File: 215 KB, 1000x941, progress of a.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11717779

>>11717764

>> No.11717780

>>11717740
Women who behave like OPs should be treated with compassion, not derision. They're the product of a society that commodifies sex and objectifies them to turn them into instruments that keeps the male population drugged with sexual release. It's about emotionally damaging one half of the population in order to appeal to the most animalistic desires of the other half to distract them, and you're exemplifying a type of antagonism that only further reinforces this divide.

If women and men alike would decide to control their sexuality and not let their sexuality control them, we could make progress. You're just being resentful for the sake of it.

>> No.11717787

>>11717779
>>11717764
Whatever happened to Quentin? I remember some pasta from a few years ago about some tripfag getting into trouble and being banned by law from using the PC or something like that. Was that about him or someone else or just some stale pasta?

>> No.11717803

>>11717787
He was an idiot. He mockingly pretended to plan shooting up his own school, which was then reported to his principle, which in turn made the news. He was doxxed and disappeared.

>> No.11717805

>>11717787
I checked and apprently he has his own page on knowyourmeme. According to that he was banned from all boards in 2011 lmao. Holy fuck, i did not realize he was around so long ago. Sometimes I forget just how long ive been on this site

>> No.11717813
File: 75 KB, 768x1024, 1532528364098.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11717813

>>11717780
Your post only represents the past 70 years or so. Want to know what changed? Men aren't allowed to physically or verbally discipline woman.

It is now LITERALLY illegal to stop women from being useless whores. It will mean the end of society.

>> No.11717997

>>11717813
This is ridiculous. If you weren't autistic you'd understand it's perfectly possible to be assertive and authoritative around the opposite sex (or anyone) without resorting to physical and verbal assaults. Women have been liberated in a lot of positive ways, they are no longer legally sanctioned victims of sexual assualt (marital rape is now criminal, divorce is possible) and they enjoy full legal protection and equal rights with men - at least on paper - which they should since they are thinking, feeling human beings.

But within liberalism they are paying a price for this by instead of being sexual slaves they are conditioned to be sexual commodities to keep mens sexual desires up and running and thus keeping the men themselves under control. You think that women have resorted to sexually promiscous behavior because they themselves desired it? The worshipping of sexual conquests in the center of our society has nothing to do with it? Ubiquitous, instant access to hardcore pornography for the entire male population - especially during their formative years - is irrelevant? Women behaving like 'useless whores' do so because they're conditioned to do it, to take part of hook-up and porn culture that caters to the desires of men, who are equally conditioned to take part in it or else be seen as 'weirdos', 'losers', 'betas' etc. Capitalism has created a feedback loop that thrives from it.

Sure, it's possible to be break free of these chains of the mind all by yourself but I don't think anyone is a bad person for not having done so, especially if they haven't been confronted with the idea yet. People like you are part of the problem - the enemy, even - moreso than women being emotionally damaged because of conditioned promiscuity.

>> No.11718011

>>11717997
making divorce easy was a mistake tho. women are fickle creatures who change their minds 20 times in a day. families are being broken up and men financially ruined because of the fleeting momentary whims of the fairer sex

>> No.11718029

>>11718011
I've fucked all your future wives. Get over it

>> No.11718034

>>11718011
That's just a symptom of america's broken legal system. 'Financial ruin' from a divorce is not a looming threat in most of the developed world. Divorce makes it easier for women to escape abusers.