/lit/ - Literature

>>11687562
Who does he believe himself to be with that pose ?
Kant?

Kermit the Pseud's patreon Q&A is not literature

>>11687562
i wish i were dead

>>11687574
Did you notice it was a painting, anon?

>>11687562
According to Peterson, we should lift weights. True /fit/ advise. *And then it froze.*

>>11687562
Unironically good advice desu. No wonder why /lit/ hates him

>>11687585
I didn't. Probably the artist used Kant's portrait as an inspiration

>>11687604
Cliff and Peterson are the true /fitlit/. How will /lit/ ever recover?

Nice! Peterson ASMR.

>>11687562
*click*
*click*
*click*
*click*

>>11687618
*the sound of desperate mouse clicking.*
LMAO.

>>11687606
This.

>>11687562
Someone ask him why he won't fight Zizek.

>Post-Modern Neo-Marxists
this nigger needs to fuck off

>Jordan "I think Marx is bad and wrong about everything even though i haven't read him" Peterson

The Minotaur should rip him a new one with his nuanced understanding of Marx.

>>11687794
I bet Sadler would put that scrawny fag in a headlock and punch his gay pragmatist face in

LOOOOOLLL!! He actually believes he has no legitimate critics!!!

>>11687562
why doesn't he bring up hume's is/ought gap

>>11687878
>Just assuming Peterson has the knowledge of and/or read [any philosopher or philosophical problem] outside of Jung and Nietzsche

>>11687562

>>11687794
>The Minotaur
Who?

>>11687921
https://www.youtube.com/user/gbisadler/videos

>"I wrote some papers that didn't get published because they were TOO DAMN COMPLICATED!"
XD XD How does he get away with this shit???

>>11687562
he takes himself way too seriously desu

>>11687878
>>11687896
He talks about Hume a bunch in Maps Of Meaning

>>11688001
Post proof.

>>11688006
>"It is not possible to finally determine either how or whether something is meaningful, by observing the
objective features of that thing. Value is not invariant, in contrast to objective reality; furthermore, it is not
possible to derive an ought from an is (this is the “naturalistic fallacy” of David Hume)."

That's two sentences from the book. The whole first chapter deals with the fact-value distinction. He uses the medieval, alchemical mind as an example of the religious mind; the type of mind that deals with value over fact.

>"The medieval man lived, for example, in a universe that was moral – where everything, even ores and metals, strived above all for perfection. 12 Things, for the alchemical mind, were therefore characterized in large part by their moral nature – by their impact on what we would describe as affect, emotion, or motivation; were therefore characterized by their relevance or value (which is impact on affect)."

>>11688006
>>11689012
Formatting got fucked; sorry.

>>11687794
this is like saying I have to try eating your shit before I denounce eating shit. We all know what that fag wants, and it's complete shit

Peterson haters are somehow more annoying than petersonfags now

>>11689031
t.petersonfag

>>11687562
I'll give Peterson credit for one thing, boy got a real suit.

my how this board has fallen...

>>11689052
4chan sucks man, it's just never been good

>>11689031
I hate him because chapotraphouse told me to.

*lobster noises*

>>11689046

Dude he gets like a quarter million bucks from his Kekistani redditor followers a month - he got himself some nice suits, new hairplugs, a tan. My boy JP really struck gold with his deepak chopra game

>>11687794

It's charitable not to read Marx. He sounds like a zombie. Anytime he stumbles on something incongruent with his Materialist principle he curses "confused", "counterrevolution", and worst of all "dialectic", and just keep going. For him Dialectics is simply a magic word that he says whenever he stumbles into being so wrong that even he notices. He's less than an ideologue, so dim that he could pass for a woman.

>>11689148
>he makes a point about the evils of resentment
>his detractors take it upon themselves to prove him right

>>11687562

>>11689324
>>11689028
Reminds me of this

>>11689148
How much of that goes towards paying people to bump every worthless thread about him on 4chan.net every hour for days on end?

>>11689461

>>11689461
Fucking leftypol are making the threads dude

>>11689451

You're confused.

>>11689337

>Don't resent me for very openly fleecing my cultist, damaged followers! You're just proving me right bucko!

wowwwwwwww truly the biggest contemporary intellectual

>>11689543
Not confused about seeing people ITT whining about things that they never directly read from.

>>11689028
No, it's really not.

>>11689571

Cease your counterrevolution. I can speak of Marx despite not reading him because DIALECTICS.

>>11689031
Slit your throat.

>>11687912
Untrue but nice.