[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 73 KB, 630x441, aol_talk.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11648695 No.11648695[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

why can't woman write serious literature?

>> No.11648763

>>11648695
If Uncle Tom's Cabin doesn't tickle your tear glands, you're hollow. But, this is tragic in a completely different sense.

>> No.11648795
File: 48 KB, 466x466, Gun-Room-Books2_grande.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11648795

it's easy to cherrypick cringy idpol shit like this

you're being willfully ignorant and intellectually dishonest to either prop up your ego or dismiss your inability to maintain relationships with the opposite sex.
but you're being ironic too by overstating your belief to an extreme that lets you distance the core of what you say from yourself. you're just stoking an aspect of 4chan culture which already exists right, because it's, like, really kekworthy lel

>> No.11648797

Why can't you write proper plurals?

>> No.11648798

>>11648695
Men have gotten to write a lot more, due to historical and societal reasons. So their best is inevitably better than that of women - they've gotten many more chances to it.

But by the same token, their worst is also way worse.

>> No.11648832

>>11648795
Name 1 (ONE) relevant female philosopher (and no, novellists/poets dont count for philosophy you absolute dip)

>> No.11648837

>>11648832
Hypatia

>> No.11648846

>>11648832
Simone de Beauvoir.

>> No.11648847

>>11648795
SEETHING roastie nigger cuck

>> No.11648849

>>11648832
Julian of Norwich

>> No.11648857

>>11648832
Simone Weil
Hannah Arendt
Emma Goldman

>> No.11648864
File: 24 KB, 384x384, 1534705049218.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11648864

>>11648797
cuz i'm a woman...

>> No.11648865

>>11648864
You're very statistically unlikely to be a woman, imma need some proof chief

>> No.11648869

>>11648857
You named two too many. Women BTFO.

>> No.11648874

>>11648832
J.K. Rowling
Saskia Noort
Gillian Flynn

>> No.11648881

>>11648832
ayn rand

>> No.11648887

>>11648832
Elaine Pagels
Edith Hamilton

>> No.11648896

>>11648763
>Crying over fiction.
>Crying over political propaganda.

>> No.11648909
File: 156 KB, 800x1136, 1534698440869.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11648909

Britte Torok
Cornela Ferrandino
Karie Nisbet
Merrily Kertis
Nola Elliott-linehan
Kevina Brenig
Johnette Sviokla
Analise Thielst
Roanne Sharples
Faina Liman
Sidonnie Endicott-west
Katusha De casserres
Tracee Bayers
Kimberly Chandra
Zelma Binford
Ashley Belliveau
Lauretta Shieber
Alyss Ozols

>you plebs probably never heard of these amazing women

>> No.11648918
File: 5 KB, 178x249, bats.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11648918

>>11648837
>>11648846
>>11648849
>>11648857
>>11648874
>>11648881
>>11648887
>>11648909
The absolute state of BTFO'd.

>> No.11648927

>>11648909
>amazing women

yiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiikes
criiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiinge

>> No.11648946

>>11648795
> prop up your ego
> your inability to maintain relationships with the opposite sex
These hoary accusations are as retarded as the OP.

>> No.11648955

>>11648946
So you can maintain a relationship with the opporite sex?

>> No.11648964

Because their literature always reaction, never action. Reaction towards men.

>> No.11648970

>>11648946
the only type of mysogyny not fueled by ressentiment, the purely dominating kind, is not likely to be found on 4chan /lit/ nor expressed in taking cheap shots at womankind's ability to write

>> No.11648978

>>11648909
>never heard of them
hm, i wonder why, maybe cuz they fucking suck?

>> No.11648983

>>11648964
hmm... interesting... care to elaborate some?

>> No.11648985

>>11648978
Or maybe because you are fucking illiterate lmao

>> No.11648999

>>11648832
Women are seldom philosophers. They use emotions and instinct, not logic.

>> No.11649006

>>11648999
On the contrary, men think with their dicks 99% of the time, the ones that do philosophy are the autists

>> No.11649011

>>11648955
"Maintaining a relationship with the opposite sex" is no different from common social competence, requiring the usual patience and tolerance. Using a presumed inability of "maintaining a relationship" as a means of arguing is folly. You imply that the accused ought to feel deep shame that this other sex with such supreme judgment disapproves of them, which is rather arrogant. It is no more than ad-hom, and pretty cliche as well.
Also, yes.

>> No.11649031

>>11648849
fuck yeah, you're alright

>> No.11649053

>>11648970
>There are exactly two reasons some people hate women.
[citation needed]

>> No.11649060

>>11648909
>listing all those nobodies
>not even mentioning Dworkin, the only feminist who brought something new to the table.

fuck outta here

>> No.11649072

>>11649011
your post is unreadable and boring

>> No.11649079

>>11649060
here are some more you illiterate noob

Britte Torok
Cornela Ferrandino
Karie Nisbet
Merrily Kertis
Nola Elliott-linehan
Kevina Brenig
Johnette Sviokla
Analise Thielst
Roanne Sharples
Faina Liman
Sidonnie Endicott-west
Katusha De casserres
Tracee Bayers
Kimberly Chandra
Zelma Binford
Ashley Belliveau
Lauretta Shieber
Alyss Ozols
Harlie Harriman
Arleyne Degeorge
Greer Humenek
Clio Day
Barbara Brick
Britte Torok
Cornela Ferrandino
Karie Nisbet
Merrily Kertis
Nola Elliott-linehan
Kevina Brenig
Johnette Sviokla
Analise Thielst
Roanne Sharples
Faina Liman
Sidonnie Endicott-west
Katusha De casserres
Tracee Bayers
Kimberly Chandra
Zelma Binford
Ashley Belliveau
Lauretta Shieber
Alyss Ozols
Harlie Harriman
Arleyne Degeorge
Greer Humenek
Clio Day
Barbara Brick

>> No.11649098
File: 31 KB, 294x443, 1534169335930.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11649098

>>11649079
>still refuses to add Dworkin, the only feminist who said anything.

>> No.11649104

>>11648763
I think men are superior to women in every way except in, mostly, breeding and intriguing, but this book, George Eliot's, Le Guin's are among the greatest in literature.

>> No.11649111
File: 19 KB, 480x360, murasaki.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11649111

>>11648695
Check out Tale of Genji by Murasaki Shikibu, she's so autistic like /lit/ she will be your new waifu, I promise desu

>> No.11649134

>>11648695
Mary Shelley
Emily Brontë

>> No.11649152
File: 18 KB, 538x299, 1534644389543.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11649152

>>11649098
all on my list are even greater feminists who said even more intesting things and did even more for all the women in the world

dworkin is a pussynigger compared to my list

>> No.11649171

>>11648695
How come you've never written any serious literature, anon?

>> No.11649184

Woman can be smart, who the fuck cares.

It's the popular subset of them that frame themselves as antagonist to men while co opting masculine culture (violence - smash the patriarchy, nazi scalps etc)

I think we're all mature enough to be able to laugh at this. The intellectual dark web is in vogue, which is about the only thing of 'ours' prevalent in pop culture. It's the best thing we have going; don't argue against it.

Why are guys supporting defending a book on toxic masculinity, particularly one so hypocritical in its toxicity? Why why why why why

>> No.11649187

>>11648832
Plato was actually women, of couirse over the time of since the greeks, it has been forgot by patriarchy. but Plato was a woman, it is known

>> No.11649189

>>11648832
The Odyssey was actually written by a woman.

>> No.11649195

>>11649189
It wasn't Homer, it was Marge

>> No.11649206
File: 22 KB, 398x500, thumbs.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11649206

>>11649195
Good one.

>> No.11649210
File: 16 KB, 208x346, 76.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11649210

Um sweetie, the greatest work of western civilization were written by women.

>> No.11649217

>>11649210
>by samuel butler
The fact that a man wrote this is probably the best argument against the OP you could possibly come up with.

>> No.11649261

>>11648832
edith stein

>> No.11649270

>>11648970
>mysogyny

you need to relax. "lol women cant write" is on the same level as "lol white people cant eat spicy food." it's a playful jab.

>> No.11649301

>>11649184
>guys

>> No.11649311

>>11649270
you are only allowed to do playful jabs at whites, men, straights, etc. when you do it the other way around it is the worst thing in the world and will cause a eugenic-handmaidstale-muslim-holocaust within mere days

>> No.11649327

>>11649311
Do you feel persecuted?

>> No.11649347

Most literature is a thinly veiled act of violence coming from an aggressive, aggrieved brokenness endemic to men. Women can be shitty and even downright sadistic but it's not really paralleled in them as far as i can tell.

>> No.11649349

>>11648832
GEM Anscombe

>> No.11649353

>>11649327
no why

>> No.11649359

>>11649327
Don't you, or are you blind?

If a group congratulates themselves for putting you down, that's bad enough. But when they've won such a large share of pop culture it's undoubtedly a problem. Plenty of people notice it. Why don't you?

>> No.11649367

>>11648832
sadie plant

>> No.11649377

>>11649347
>most literature is a thinly vieled act of violence.. and men are drastically more guilty of it
What in the self loathing SJW fuck are you talking about

>> No.11649399

>>11648832
Hipparchia.

She did become a Cynic because of a man she fell in love with and sought to emluate though and didn't contribute anything original so maybe that proves your point.

>> No.11649582

>>11648832
Cynthia Freeland

>> No.11649585

>>11648695
women are infantile
next

>> No.11649617

because women are low intelligence and they lack the ability to philosophise about anything beyond their own bodies and food

>> No.11649647

>>11648846
Simone de Beauvoir was pure shit

>> No.11649660

>>11649377
yep lit is cuddly cloudland not riddled with abusive drunks, psychotic depressives, political monsters, devilish mystics and other freaks who took the most joy from their searing polemics tearing everything else down

>> No.11649669

>>11649347
You think you sound really intelligent dont you, autist?

>> No.11649673

>>11649660
>abusive drunks, psychotic depressives, political monsters, devilish mystics
literally all me lmao, is this like a type on here, are we a thing?

>> No.11649691

>>11649673
>>11649669
both yes

>> No.11649885

>>11648832
Hilary Clinton, ignorant trumpturd