/lit/ - Literature

>>11632379
>the OP hates woman with such fervor that he loses all respect for a person who doesn't.

You ought to try leaving your house and interacting with people in the general world for once

>>11632388
>M-muh women!

>>11632379
Real men don't despise women, even when they whip them. They whip them because they love them. If you can't understand that, then you aren't a man.

>>11632459
Shut the fuck up.

>>11632490
>"fuck"
>uncalled for display of aggression
Anon, are you sexually frustrated?

>>11632513
No, actually. It's just that you're retarded.

>>11632404

Why don't you go out with hookers and end your suffering?

Also, today, with Tinder, it's a piece of cake to get girls. You can go out with a new one every week, at least a new one every month.

Nietzsche didn't despise women. He saw them as they are with no idealization that is all..

>>11632523
I'm afraid you're projecting.

>>11632404
>hates women
>calls other soi

Imagine being this delusional and inexperienced

>>11632536
White knighting is peak soi.

>>11632521
Elaborate or fuck off.

>>11632459
based raymond carver poster

>>11632548
>anything other than hating all women is white knighting

Seriously, though, are you autistic? Nobody is that socially retarded. Or are you a programmer so you think everything is 1's and 0's with no nuance?

>>11632637
False equivalence. What you're doing does not fall under:
>anything other than hating all women
It is categorical white knighting.

>>11632637
This, OP you're a fucking moron.

I don't hate you, I feel bad for you.

>>11632655
>OP says he loses respect for someone because the person does not despise women
>I suggest he go out and interact with people in real life
>You consider this white knighting

>>11632677
Yes. It's fallacious reasoning used to make me look ridiculous (hurr you don't need anyone else to make you look ridiculous). I go outside and interact with people every day. That has nothing to do with my idea of women.

>>11632404
men exist to serve and dominate women
your flippant disregard for them is your failure as a man

>>11632697
It's not disregard. It is hate. I regard them often.

>>11632691
>It's fallacious reasoning used to make me look ridiculous
>he thinks it's the other anon's reasoning making him look ridiculous

>>11632727
Yes, you saying going outside will somehow lift my sexism is designed to 1. make me seem like a shut in and 2. make my opinion of women seem unfounded in reality when it comes from a lifetime of interacting with them. So yes, your reasoning was a failed attempt at making me look ridiculous. Just like this most recent response. Because your most recent response assumes I am objectively ridiculous and that I am trying to place the blame for that on your posts when all I am doing is undoing your specious reasoning.

I bet OP is ugly

>>11632759
I've had multiple women ask me out and speak of me favorably so I don't think I'm below average in appearance.

>>11632750
It really isn't that anon's reasoning. Just look at this post you just typed. Jesus christ.

But if you're OP, I advise you read more Nietzsche, because you haven't a clue what he was on about with women, or what being a man is about. Your interactions with modern women aren't enough to form an appropriate assessment on the ancient notions of manhood and womanhood.

>>11632691
So no memeing anymore, because this is kind of becoming sad. But why do you hate women so much? I think that a lot of men hate women because they build a fantasy of what they are like in their head, and when the reality that women are flawed humans just like men sets in - those men seek comfort in internet communities who contend that all women are horrible. But Anon, I'm here to tell you that there are beautiful, kind, and honorable people of either gender out there. I know you will find one if you just let the past go. Be wary, have lines that you won't let be crossed, and don't be a doormat - women generally like a strong, assertive male - but don't be an asshole either and you will find wonderful people, men and women, who will enrich your life.

>>11632774
I don't care about Nietzsche or "ancient notions of manhood and womanhood".

>>11632783
Jesus all the projecting in this thread. You assume I have some disturbing hatred of women in general. I hate the gender the way I hate tv- it is vapid and bad for you. There have been a couple I like over the years and quit implying I have had romantic failures leading to these feelings. I've probably been in the longest relationship of anyone in this thread.

>>11632813
>I don't care about Nietzsche or "ancient notions of manhood and womanhood"
Stick to your shallow conceptions of humanity, then.

>>11632813
Yikes, why are you so mad?

>>11632813
It's like you started out shitposting with the rest of us and then got angrier and angrier for real

>>11632824
What about my message seemed particularly mad to you? Or is this just part of your rhetorical strategy. You can't make me seem like an ugly shut-in anymore so now you're resorting to...calling me mad?

>>11632822
Nothing I've said in this thread could be categorized as anything other than that. I haven't even made any claims except maybe about the intelligence of certain anons who were projecting about my life in the first place.

>>11632829
I don't see how anything I've said is like a shitpost.

>>11632838
Read your posts again tomorrow, you come off as angry and borderline hysterical. Also that you keep responding to me and whoever else is posting again and again. I'm responding because I like going down this rabbit hole, but you are on defensive this whole time, constantly explaining yourself. It's ok to not take things seriously on an anonymous board. Seriously, I like virtually hanging out with you guys, and razzing everyone, but I unironically wish everyone the best

>>11632859
You're doing exactly what I'm doing, the only difference is you have a team. Just because now at the last minute you are claiming you don't care, even though you have, and probably will continue to go shot-for-shot doesn't make you more lighthearted. There is nothing wrong with defending yourself. Especially when you are being ganged up on, and with such illogical arguments.

>>11632379

NEETzsche was hysterical after all.

Op a gay

This is a quality thread. All participants get gold stars.

>>11632379
I would like to hear, in his own words, what OP’s exact opinion on women is, how it differs from nietzche’s opinions, and how this difference justifies a loss of respect for such a renowned author.

>>11632379