[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 41 KB, 643x727, 1531252832796.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11628238 No.11628238[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

How do atheists reconsile with Pascals Wager?

>> No.11628247

>>11628238
It's the dumbest fucking fallacy ever and it applies to them just as much as atheists. There are what? 5000+ religions in the world currently? All of which claim to be the "right one"

>> No.11628249

>>11628238
>"which year is it"

>> No.11628528

>>11628238
Most atheists think that as long as you are a reasonably good person a just god wouldn't punish you too much.

>> No.11628539

>>11628247
>>11628528
r*ddit

>> No.11628547

The same way they attempt to reconcile with the rest of reality; mental gymnastics

>> No.11628549

>>11628528

It's not even that, though. Either god doesn't exist or even if he does, as he is described in the cults which have historically obtained, then he is undeserving of worship. Nor is it any sort of a defense to say, "oh but you have to no matter what anyway b/c otherwise you'll go to hell lmao". The point is that it is still necessary to reject god even and espcially in the case that he actually is, and is as described-which is to say, an asshole. That this might be impossible for a rational actor, if one has hell-avoidance first and foremost, does not obviate its moral necessity.

>> No.11628557

>>11628238
You can invoke the possibility of an inverse Pascal's wager, whereby only those who do not have faith in God/Jesus go to heaven. The probability of either the Pascal's wager or the inverse Pascal's wager being true is indeterminate, thus all you are left with to guide your decision is your intuition (the religious refer to this intuition as faith). Atheists' intuition leads them the way it does.

>> No.11628560

>>11628238
by graduating high school

>> No.11628562

>>11628549
O shit tru

>> No.11628583
File: 260 KB, 1685x1930, aVSVQ.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11628583

>>11628238
Pic related.
Or also, you know, by recognizing God isn't some retard who will reward you for choosing to believe in him for the sake of playing the best move in a punishment avoidance game.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NdbkvJznmwU

>> No.11628585

>>11628238
I won't speak for other atheists but I reconcile it by reasoning that if God existed I would still defy him. Hell doesn't frighten me. Bring it on, little man!

>> No.11628601

>>11628585
Wait, just kidding.

>> No.11628608

>>11628528
No one said God is just.

>> No.11628629

>>11628238
Suck my dick or you go to hell forever. I'm god. What is your response? If you take Pascal's wager seriously, then get sucking.

>> No.11628636

>>11628238
The better question is, how did Pascal reconcile it. The Catholic idea of belief isn't sola fide. You genuinely need to believe and belief is backed up by actions. Was Pascal a crypto Heugonot?

>> No.11628653

>>11628547
Reddit.com

>> No.11628658

If God's real then he's a twat and his universe is shit

>> No.11628672

>>11628608
Why would one worship an unjust god?

>> No.11628674

Maybe this is a stupid thing to ask since it's so obvious but isn't trying to believe in God just because you think it's the safe bet not really in the spirit of being a believer?

>> No.11628681

>>11628238

I'm surprised that so many anons posting ITT recognize the problem of the unjust god. Good job. Unusual, given the LARPing, never-sincere turn back towards theism in 4chan's past eight years or so.

>> No.11628689

>>11628672
To be granted eternity in the Kingdom of Heaven

>> No.11628692

>>11628247
>b-but there's soooo many religions
literally a Reddit tier answer

>> No.11628696

>>11628583
Wiccanism is all sorts of retarded.
>Protestants, Catholics, Jews, and Muslims may go to Purgatory, Hell, or Heaven, but Jehovah's Witnesses and Mormons definitely go to Heaven. Btw, we get reincarnated.

>> No.11628720

Pascal's Wager relies on dubious and flawed premises.

>> No.11628728

>>11628653
are you trying to find the type this in the search engine to return to where you came from?

>> No.11628731

>>11628238
Read J.L. Mackie you subhuman brainlet

>> No.11628768

>>11628549
It's hubris to disobey, and say you know better than a being who is all-knowing and infinitely more powerful than you. Try telling your boss he doesn't know how to do his job and he can go fuck himself.
>>11628672
God's justice is absolute while your idea of justice is feels>reals.

>> No.11628774

>>11628731
call me that one more time and see what happens.
>>11628720
reddit af

>> No.11628802
File: 65 KB, 1008x402, 1506448221593.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11628802

Today I learned that any argument can be refuted with the word "reddit".

>> No.11628819

>>11628802
>Today I learned
nice reddit catchphrase my guy but you totally outed yourself as a redditor

>> No.11628822

People really interpret Pascal on this one.. and also the historical context from which he wrote, both in a general sense of being able to envision a God other than the Platonic infinite and infinitely good, and from his particular Jansenist context and what the Pensees actually were. Pascal's point and his argument are both a lot more complex than the vulgar version passed down like a game of telephone.

>> No.11628831

>>11628768

>all bosses are good

God you're fucking dumb. It's also deeply depressing for your sake that your closest analogy-at-hand was a modern conception of "a boss" in a modern business environment.

>> No.11628833

>>11628822
oops, misinterpret*.

>> No.11628838

>>11628831
>God you're
So you admit God exists