/lit/ - Literature

>>11609466
>lurk
Moar

What, you mean psycho analysis?

>>11609586
first year stuff so I'm not sure cause he didn't state that. But yeah basically the one that doesn't focuses too much on the biology which is my psychology 2

I just want to know /lit/ favourite stuff to read that's about the human psyche

>>11609466
Please leave this board and never return if you agree with any of the following sentences:

>you read any form of genre fiction
>you barely know your classics
>you tend to believe that if you like a given work, it is justified on an artistic level
>you think everyone's opinion should be accepted and respected
>you speak a single language
>you read contemporary versions of Shakespeare or Milton
>you read for the plot
>you read for entertainment
>you rarely read nonfiction
>you don't have a solid grounding in philosophy
>you do not at least have some understanding of the Three Tragedians and Homer
>you have little to no understanding of literature outside of your cultural horizon
>you have little to no understanding of literature within your own cultural horizon (muh african authors)
>you mostly read contemporary literature
>you believe 'the author is dead'
>you make your literary analysis proceed from ideology
>you think intricate prose is 'pretentious' and that the author 'should just get to the point'
>your rarely read poetry
>you think Rhythm and Rhyme is just useless rules and laws restricting creativity
>you have a hard time explaining why you like a given work
>you have a hard time forming structured and relevant literary criticism
>you tend to refuse to judge works for yourself, rather relying on the opinions of literary authorities
>you rarely read for more than one or two hours straight

>>11609714
I don't, but I'll gladly leave if this is the board for wannabe intellectual upstarts

>hurr durr, I'm gatekeeping to protect muh IQ levels from speaking to peasants

>>11609714
>clear newfag spams the Novalis pasta to try and fit in
pathetic. There's nothing wrong with someone asking for reqs

>>11609714
foolish uneducated swine, I bet you don't even know the fundamentals of the internalization of quantum-metaphysics in the human essence

>>11609805
>tfw spent most of this weekend reading papers on foundational quantum mechanics and metaphysics. The more I read, the sillier the notion of a mind-independent reality becomes.

As for your question, OP, read Jung.

>>11609466
>the woman does not exist.
read lacan. chances are your professor probably doesn't even understand his theories.

>>11609852
Yeah I had some of his books ordered, still waiting on it though
>tmw someone actually did try to apply quantum physics' concepts for the mind

>>11609922
Thanks. First day he actually told us it was his first time teaching, at some point he just gives us work and doesn't have classes for the next few meetings. I'm just glad he isn't ridiculously demanding.

>>11609930
>tmw someone actually did try to apply quantum physics' concepts for the mind

Read this. https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://ispcjournal.org/journals/2017-19/Kastrup_19.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwirpcn91OfcAhWsDMAKHbNQBY4QFjAAegQIARAB&usg=AOvVaw0-7i1_ryuS1uFw_9q2rlPM

>>11609714
>you think ... Rhyme is just [a] useless [rule or law that restricts] creativity
Like Milton?