/lit/ - Literature

>>11464930
Did you read 'Bible', bruh?

>>11464930
sames goes for band names
i realised this when listening to my favourite 80s album by The.

>did you like iliad
>yeah man i loved iliad
Sounds pretty stupid desu

>>11464968
>>11464952
i said books not stories

I am sick and tired of this. Every day I come to /lit/, and every day there is at least one thread up with an OP image of an attractive woman dressed scantily and posing seductively. It's probably the same one or two people who do it honestly. Let me tell you something, you faggot pieces of shit who are doing this: you are the poster child for everything that is wrong in literature, art, and society as a whole today. You are incapable of coming up with anything creative, thought provoking, or of substance, and you lack even the smallest modicum of intelligence, so you use "style" and "flash" and pizazz in place of it and to draw attention to yourself, because that's the only way your SHIT "creation" and ideas would ever get seen by anyone. And before you say anything, this has NOTHING to do with the fact that I don't have a girlfriend. Anyway, I will be petitioning the owner of this website to ban your asses, so enjoy being able to post here while it lasts, because it's not going to last long, just like you that one time you convinced an obese girl to let you fuck her.

>>11464930
Wrong. Howell's A Modern Instance would suffer immeasurable damage (as a title) given the extraction of its initial indefinite article, anon.
Plus, Naked and Dead would be misleading. Etc.

>>11464952
FPBP

>'of' when it should be on
>'on' when it should be of

>>11465033
Too based and redpilled for these slut-worshipping cucks on /lit/

>>11465033
Unironically this.

>>11464984
WEAK

Women don't understand how male lust actually operates. Women think that men experience women as "the Beautiful," as something pleasant and trifling that can be enjoyed at a distance and then allowed to pass on. They think that a picture of themselves wearing clothing that shows off all their fat and all their soft skin and warm nice holes is like a postcard with a picture of a beach on it. But to men, female beauty is not the Beautiful, it's the Sublime, it's not trifling but great and terrible, and it stirs something great and terrible and daemonic in man's subterranean depths that impels him forward to fuck things from roughly below and behind the prostate area.

When a man sees a picture of a beautiful sexy woman he feels half a million years of race knowledge thrumming in his veins, an infinity of sexy women reaching around behind themselves to spread their asscheeks and pussy apart with one hand and say "fuck me." He hears the drums from the movie Jumanji, his soul tangibly but invisibly leans forward outside of him grasping desperately for the pussy and gnashing its teeth. He wants to taste her holes and squeeze her fat and smell that combination of smells girls have that when you ask them what it is they say it's just normal shampoo and fabric softener but you know it's something more.

It's not fair to post these hot sluts constantly. The jezebels guy is right and this post is not an homage. I'm going to kill myself if I can't escape from this feeling soon. Women don't understand what they're doing. I saw a girl on a bicycle yesterday and I started thinking about what it would be like to be a bicycle seat for 10 minutes.

Alright kid, I don't who you are or where you live, but that is going to change. Soon. That's right, I'm going to find out where you live and I'm going to fucking KILL you. Why, you ask? Take a look at the picture you attatched to the originel post of the thread. Yeah, notice anything? It seems that you have used JEZEBELS to further aggregate attention to your thread. Big mistake, buck-o. I am going to kill you for many reasons, but the principle one will be this propensity of yours to propagate licentious behavior which is the utter buttress of our society's (and our individual souls') downfall. No no, don't bother trying to delete it, the deed is done. You were dead the moment you attached these scantily whores to your post and filled out the captcha.

You think it's easy being me? You don't know the half of it, kid. You don't know the sort of rejection I've faced. And this is my territory you;re in. I bet you thought you could just come into this board and post whatever you wanted, like /b/ or /r9k/, rite? Wrong. I and many others come here for the specific point of discussing TECHNOLOGY. Read that word carefully, look it up if you have too. And while we were amiably pursing this noble subject of erudition, you came along and decided it was a propitious idea to put a libidinally charge representation of what I, and many others on this board, cannot attain on the front fucking page. You cretin. You sad, dead, little phallus-minded moron.

So in conclusion: prepare yourself. Post whatever jezebels you have left, with the time you have (it isn't very much time). I'm coming for you, bitch.

>>11465033
this but unironically, i hate jezebelposters who make dumb threads just to post roasties

>>11465033
>>11466288
>>11466333
Complaining about Jezebel posting only serves to strengthen the resolve of Jezebel posters. To combat this plague upon this board anons must change the approach. From now on, the sight of a Jezebel must strengthen the resolve toward chastity and the pursuit of truth. The best tactic here is, not to turn away the eyes, but to have compassion on the Jezebels, to see, for instance, that look of desperation and boredom in their eyes, and to have a sort of detached pity on them, and then to see how they have dolled themselves up with eye shadow and lipstick, and to get a sick feeling in your stomach, knowing that a person has deliberately degraded themselves for the sake of attention, on account of their despicably weak capacity to feel shame. Think of the anon who posted the image, how he, yielding to his own lust, saved the picture on his computer, knowing full well that he was to act out of some sadistic impulse and post the picture, even without any kind of relation to the comment. How he must have derived some subtle, sick pleasure out of considering that other anons would become weak and distracted by it, and knowing at the same time that he was abusing the apathetic insecurity of some young woman. Learn to find it strangely horrific that young women have a lost look in their eyes, as though they were men that fell into a kind of feminine stupor and suddenly became strongly identified with showing off their bare skin and looking like they want to be preyed upon in animalistic fashion.

If, on the contrary we see a woman with none of these characteristics, who yet appears alluring, one must consider the possibility that she has made the noble pledge of chastity herself, and would be utterly horrified to find a man huffing over her in a savage way or scanning her body with his eyes, licking his lips and so forth. We must all become partners in Christ and feel sorrow for these Jezebels, and become sick with ourselves for behaving like beasts driven by blind lust. Do not wish for your sisters to debase themselves in an ugly or crude way, rather exhibit through your pure, concentrated will to truth a true manhood which helps to restrain the wild feminine impulses which yield to the ridiculous and the superfluous.

>>11466358
t. white knight or roastie

>>11466358
It's.. beautiful

>>11466358
10/10

>>11464930
You’re wrong, but for the right reasons

>>11466358
>>11466333
>>11466288
jezebel pastas are quite literally the best thing /lit/ ever produced, our most original contribution to chan culture, our mark on world history

>>11467277
meant to quote u too bud
>>11465033

>>11467277
>not "groupon tickets to hamilton"
what else so perfectly captures a whole class of people in one phrase

>>11467277
Thanks. You should try posting them sometime when you get the chance. The trinity of Jezebel pastas stands strong!

>>11467344
came too late...post it?

>>11464968
Homer's Iliad doesn't sound bad