[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 51 KB, 680x457, albertcamus.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11450797 No.11450797 [Reply] [Original]

Is Sisyphus just The Knight Of Infinite Resignation?

>> No.11451208

???

>> No.11452393

>>11450797
When reading Camus you shouldn't think of Sisyphus as a man, but view his punishment as what we are all unavoidably subjected to.
If you need help understanding The Myth of Sisyphus and The Stranger then listen to DFW's This Is Water, it'll explain what the metaphor means if nothing else.

>> No.11452771

>>11450797
No. Camus was against faith. If you understood The Myth of Sysyphus enough to ask then I must assume you didn't understand Kierkegaard. Then again, that whole book is about ways to approach human toil without recourse to anything higher. So maybe you didn't understand it either.

Tl;Dr just because they're both labeled existentialists doesn't mean there is a fruitful comparison

>> No.11452836

>>11452771
I thought Knight of Infinite Resignation wasn't about faith. You're thinking of the Knight of Faith

>> No.11452870
File: 104 KB, 796x744, wojack pepe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11452870

>>11450797
Is Wojack just The Knight of Infinite Resignation and Smug Pepe The Knight of Faith?

>> No.11452969

>>11450797
Are people on this board finally going to understand that Camus was the only author to really understand Kierkegaard

Good post OP but u should've anticipated the brainlet comments from people who read a wiki article on SK once

>> No.11453212

>>11450797
>resigned to his infinite fate
seems like a “yes” to me

>> No.11453426

>>11452771
>I must assume you didn't understand Kierkegaard
Kek

>> No.11454401

>>11452870
Nah. Wojack is lost in the infinite and Pepe is lost in the finite. They are both in despair.

>> No.11454426

>>11450797
the knight of infinite resignation would be bound by the rational impossibility of ever pushing that stone over the mountain. he would watch it roll down and give up.
the knight of faith is much like Sisyphus, for even if he knows it is impossible, yes he accepts the absurd by the power of god and continues pushing the stone upwards.

the difference between the two is that Camus offered a version of the knight of faith that does not rely on an acceptance of god, but rather an acceptance of the absurd.

>> No.11455721

>>11454426
Why would he give up?

>> No.11455905

>>11452969
actually I was just bumping this thread to slide another one off page 10