/lit/ - Literature

What? Who gives a fuck

Get a new friend desu.

>>11378527
These things have implications.

>>11378601
They have implications if you're some sort of bitch bugman who gets his values from 4chan

>>11378606
/thread

get your shit together OP.

>>11378521
>Mommy, he said something I don't like it. Bully Bully!

If it's brainwashed propaganda, tell him

>>11378521
Imagine complaining about contemporary conforming vocabulary on the literature board

>>11378674
It's feeling that way. He's had the sense to mention FGM, but the current situation is a literal rape culture and he hasn't shyed away from using that term.

I mean if this is the kinda person you associate with youre probably a fag too op. Its ok thats a pretty key demographic people are trying to reach out to these days.

>>11378724
>>11378709
>>11378708
>>11378674
>>11378673
>>11378608
>>11378606
>>11378601
>>11378531
>>11378527
>>11378521
t. soiboy boomer bugman externalisation of qualities I'm insecure about

>>11378521
What’s your problem with this phrase? It’s just means non-transgender male.

>>11378741
So just a male.

>>11378741
It's not the phrase, it's what it implies about the user. It'd like hearing a non-historian use the term "Roman salute".

>>11378754
Who gives a fuck you insecure bitch. Surely you already know this "friend". Honestly you're acting like a fucking woman mate.

>>11378747
No it means a non-transgender male retard

>>11378764
>

>>11378754
>it's what it implies about the user

What does it imply, that he is a caring human who is sensitive to the plight of minorities?

>>11378770
Great point bugman

>>11378747
libtards BTFO epic style, praise KEK!

>>11378774
4chan told me that is a cu'ckish thing to do
so like the bitch I am I hate him for it

>>11378764
Does it also mean a non-fish human?

>>11378774
At minimum It implies that he has extreme political beliefs.

>>11378786
It could be used to describe either a fish human or a non-fish human. By the information that is given, it means a non-transgender male.

>>11378764
Yeah, a normal male.

>>11378793
Yes, being transgender is statistically abnormal. Brilliant observation.

>>11378788
It just implies that he has probably the same view of the transgender issue as most psychiatrists.

>>11378801
yeah and most psychiatrists are bugmen retards
unlike me a smart man who gets fed his opinions from /pol/

>>11378804
Kek why is leftypol like this. It comes off so fucking weird.

>>11378801
No, it doesn't. Psychiatrists wouldn't use that terminology. He clearly learns from a different school.

>>11378809
seriously it is an unbelievably lame form of trolling

>>11378809
hurr yu eida godda be pol tribe lyke me or u da leftipol enemeh

there is literally NOTHING wrong with being deranged

>>11378521
Act like a real proof reader/editor and give him an honest, real world critique of his "writing". It sounds like he's just trying to reinforce his own fragile belief system.

>>11378818
This. OP don't worry about being a deranged faggot who felt the need to post his precious fee-fees on /lit/ because his friend used a naughty word.

>>11378764
Fuck off tranny cunt

>>11378527
>le who cares does it affect you, bigot?

why do you people "trigger" so easily

>>11378833
If you get your knickers in a twist because someone used the word "cis" then you're a faggot

>>11378831
Not even a tranny, just don't like all these hypocrite soiboy pol faggots who think they're a level above those they hate

>>11378817
Sorry for not being on so many layers of irony that it basically broke my brain and can only post like the guys I hate so much. YEEIKEESS

>>11378821
I would, but what could I actually say beyond "most people won't know what you're talking about"?

>>11378846
>YEEIKEESS

SNAP

>>11378608
You clearly have good intension so I'll take you seriously. Assuming that this is my problem, how would I fix it?

>>11378521
Congratulations! You have once again succeeded in posting a thinly-veiled 'literature' thread with the intention to gossip like a schoolgirl!

Does the story relate to transexuals or is it just being used to describe a standard male? If so that is pretty clowny

>>11378952
There's a single trans character. The situation was along the lines of "I haven't picked up that particular skill because I'm not a cis male".

>>11378965
I mean it doesn't sound like what a transgender male would say, and the writing feels autistic, but I see no reason for outrage.

>>11378976
It makes sense in context.

>>11378883
start listening to what people are trying to say instead of focusing on single words and ignoring the rest. lunatics can be fucking crazy without using new-fangled words and using buzzwords doesn't actually invalidate what a person is saying if they actually use it coupled with a coherent opinion.

>>11378984
is the tranner autistic?

>>11378996
No. The magic that was being used is allegedly not the sort that a female would know how to use, although now that you mention it, I can't see why that would be the case.

>>11378993
I'll take on your advice.

>this thread

>>11379060
Continue?

>>11378839
Go to bed Contrapoints.