/lit/ - Literature

>>11337724
>which I can only clumsily guess is the "totality" of that which is uncovered while 'being' is more so of that which names it
As with a lot of Heidegger, it's hard to say, but you might find some of Thomas Sheehan's essays on Heidegger interesting.

You can find pdfs to most of his articles at https://religiousstudies.stanford.edu/people/thomas-sheehan/publications, but the following are particularly good starting points:

http://heidegger-circle.org/Gatherings2011-01Sheehan.pdf

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7NHCkm1kkQGdVhjZGNMVXBWb3M/view

There's a lot to quibble with or disagree with on Sheehan's take, but it's one of the rare interpretations that makes rigorous use of almost all of Heidegger's writings.

>>11338229
I'm definitely printing these, that is a great resource. I'm not sure about the meaning but he's absurdly relevant. I should learn german.

Kant's dichotomy between noumena and phenomena was always a bit artificial

Aquinas beat Heidegger to Being by a couple hundred years, not to mention Schelling, not to mention all the great mystics

Heidegger's nothingness is an atheistic ungrund

>>11338591
>Aquinas beat Heidegger to Being by a couple hundred years
It's a quibble, but not really. Heidegger knows well what Aquinas is about, and is after something almost entirely different, as per the two essays in >>11338229.

>>11338640
well he certainly does but it gets tiring hearing about heidegger was the first in the West to think of the distinction between what a thing is vs. that it is. the absolute state of the West, I guess

either way I am just quibbling

>>11337724

Reminder: Heidegger's explanation on Curiosity and Idle Talk btfo the above pseuditry. Give it up and stop coming to the boards.

>>11338863
How does what you're saying reflect upon fallenness, existentiality and authenticity?

>>11337724
>certain tribes
you mean the Christian Germanic-Italic-Greek Europeans, North Africans and Muslim Arabs right?

>>11337724
Fuck. Now I have the motivation to into Heidegger.

>>11338863
Women don't understand how male lust actually operates. Women think that men experience women as "the Beautiful," as something pleasant and trifling that can be enjoyed at a distance and then allowed to pass on. They think that a picture of themselves wearing clothing that shows off all their fat and all their soft skin and warm nice holes is like a postcard with a picture of a beach on it. But to men, female beauty is not the Beautiful, it's the Sublime, it's not trifling but great and terrible, and it stirs something great and terrible and daemonic in man's subterranean depths that impels him forward to fuck things from roughly below and behind the prostate area.

When a man sees a picture of a beautiful sexy woman he feels half a million years of race knowledge thrumming in his veins, an infinity of sexy women reaching around behind themselves to spread their asscheeks and pussy apart with one hand and say "fuck me." He hears the drums from the movie Jumanji, his soul tangibly but invisibly leans forward outside of him grasping desperately for the pussy and gnashing its teeth. He wants to taste her holes and squeeze her fat and smell that combination of smells girls have that when you ask them what it is they say it's just normal shampoo and fabric softener but you know it's something more.

It's not fair to post these hot sluts constantly. The jezebels guy is right and this post is not an homage. I'm going to kill myself if I can't escape from this feeling soon. Women don't understand what they're doing. I saw a girl on a bicycle yesterday and I started thinking about what it would be like to be a bicycle seat for 10 minutes.

>>11338863
>those lips

>>11340822

6/10

More subtle, less graphic.