/lit/ - Literature

>>11312213
Ebola reading guide might help

>>11312229
Thanks, that’s a start.

But I’m looking for a book (I don’t care how dry or academic it is) that is a history of the far right.

>>11312213
Neither of them are considered serious intellectuals so nothing authentically academic can be found of the sort. The job is then left to people of about your intelligence level posting conspiracy theories on blogs. I can no more help you find those blogs then google can. Hope I helped.

>>11312213
You're imagining some kind of intellectual tradition that involves fascism, nazism, Spengler, and Evola into a coherent narative. It doesn't exist. No one sees it that way. The Third Reich took Spengler by surprise and he even predicted it'd be gone within ten years of his death. Which it was.

Just read the history of the period and the original works and you'll be fine.

>>11312242
>Neither of them are considered serious intellectuals

yeah you're stupid

>>11312213
there is no intellectual history outside of the 19th and very early 20th century. Evola isn’t an intellectual either he’s a pseudo-intellectual occultist LARPer who was disavowed by the entire rw. Read Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, de Maistre, Schmitt, Jünger, Weinenger, Rosenberg (have fun, he’s a retard and blatantly lies about history and biology), Hitler, Goebells diaries, Hitler’s Mein Kampf, Carlyle, Hobbes, Spengler’s Decline and you’ll have covered their “intellectual” tradition thoroughly

i read N and couldn’t bring myself to read authoritarian rw lit its so debased and resentful there’s no purpose to it. but you’re an 18 year old midwit so it should fit you like a new glove or a trojan condom which im sure you just started using. Oh you didn’t well the glove then, unless you’ve never played baseball or had nice gloves then i suppose you wouldn’t comprehend the simile. Regardless you’re almost certainly stupid so read what i recc’d and never post here again fag

IDK if it's good or not but that's what pic related is supposed to be

also the book Devil's Bargain on Steve Bannon (Bannon is apparently obsessed with Guenon, thinks we're in the Kali Yuga, and thought electing Donald Trump was supposed to be important for some reason related to all that stuff)

Kerry Bolton's "Artists of the Right" does what you're looking for for art. Being "on the right" was a given in the past though, so I don't know how you would give a history of it. Were monarchies "right wing"?

>>11312213
OP just read up on Catholic intellectual thought in the 19th and 20th centuries, that should cover anything of genuine scholarly weight. Also, any history of the right/traditionalism that leaves out Catholic thinkers is necessarily incomplete.

>>11312268
Excellent post

>>11312242
>The job is then left to people of about your intelligence level posting conspiracy theories on blogs
You say that like it's a bad thing
http://visupview.blogspot.com/2014/03/fight-club-evola-and-secret-societies.html

>>11312268
>>11312247
I mean, I found books like pic related. This guy also wrote a book about the alt-right, so I’m sure there’s some works out there that give an overview of far right ideology that aren’t just fringe bloggers.

>>11312279
Thanks, I’ll look into it

I just want to say, I’m not looking into the far-right for political reasons, I’m just generally interested in how their beliefs came to be and who were the big figures of it.

>>11312283
I’m talking more 20th Century, people who’s work laid the groundwork for facism, and the people who continued to support it after WW2.

>>11312310
changes basically nothing I said

>>11312354
>>11312379
Dreamer of the Day: Francis Parker Yockey & the Postwar Fascist International
> Francis Parker Yockey, lawyer & former war-crimes prosecutor, was one of the most enigmatic figures inside the far right in both Europe & America. His story is at the heart of the postwar Fascist International, a shadow Reich composed of conspirators, spies & occultists. This study is a treasure chamber for all interested in the ideological heirs of fascism & Nazism, of National bolshevism, Odinism, various occult sects of the extreme right & groups trying to provide a synthesis between extreme left & far-right thought--Walter Laquer

bump.

"Far right" merely describes historical normalcy. It has been having foreign agitators and revolutionaries (jews) in our countries that has dragged people in different directions by corrupting norms and making nature seem unnatural, because that is part of their strategy for weakening the host society they wish to conquer from within. The left-right spectrum is a farce.

>>11312213
Why should anyone bother himself with writing a history of idiocy?

>>11313669

>>11313687
...and if you're searching for /pol/ go backwards and then turn sharp right. But make sure to not take an IQ-test on your way out - they might mercifully euthanize you otherwise.

>>11312242
>>11312247
>>11312268
these

>>11313720
You know that thing you're typing on and all of the other nice shit you like? All of that was created by white men who were de facto white nationalists.

>>11313738
>Most of that was created by white men who were de facto jews (Einstein and many, many others), libertarians (pretty much all of them), or gay (Turing and others).
ftfy

Does it make you feel uncomfortable?

>>11313767
Lynn published a list of jewish sci/tech accomplishments prior to 1800. I'll post it for you below:

>>11313832
I'll give you Spinoza and Moses Mendelssohn and now give me a list of white nationalist's sci/tech accomplishments prior to 1800.
Honestly, just fuck up and go back to /pol/, there are enough idiots on /lit/ yet, and I'm running out of Dalek pics.

>>11313919
Psf, stupid kike, see your way out. What white nationalists advocate for was the default before we made the mistake of letting your people in, again. A problem that will soon be corrected.

This may serve you:

>View from the Right, Volume I: Heritage and Foundations

>The book consists of a series of essays and profiles of various thinkers and figures who Benoist considers to embody the defining elements of the various strands of Right-wing thought. It immediately took the French political and intellectual worlds by storm, and in 1978 it was awarded the Grand Prize by the prestigious and historic French Academy.

I haven't read it yet myself, but it looks cool.

>>11312213
>western far-right
No such thing.

>>11313935
>Hurr, durr, look at my fantasies of omnipotence. I'm too stupid to invent the weapons I'd need to realize them, and I can't afford to even buy them because I'm white trash. But me and my redneck buddies will be really, really powerful, eventually.
Pleb.

>>11312242
Spengler is criminally underrated and maligned, he is unironically one of the greatest thinkers of the early 20th century.

>>11313975
This

I don't know of any comprehensive books, but I would recommend reading the George Webber translations of Carl Schmitt, he gives an excellent background on how Schmitt's ideals came to be. While Schmitt is only a small part of the movement, and may even be considered distinct from the right-wing movements at the time, it will give you a good background of the juridical and philosophical arguments concerning the state and the nature of sovereignty at the time.

>>11313972
I'm not a /pol/fag but Whovians are subhuman and I'm more embarrassed to share a board with you than the legions of 14 year old drumpftards. I mean being wrong about fucking everything isn't as bad as being a Whovian - which is an insult to art and life

>>11312213
Tbh the distinction between Left and Right is so fucking boring and should be abandoned completely.

>>11312268
This a good post, only in that it correctly notes that "right-wing" intellectualism isn't a real thing and nor is Left-wing intellectualism.

John Locke, considered a "liberal" by many, is by all means a reactionary by today's standards. Is he a left-wing intellectual?

>>11312268
>v-virgin!

>>11312213
you can read Moldbug for a history of politics with the left as the manifestation of political entropy and the right as a reaction to that entropy

>>11312213
There's a great book called "Hot to Convince Yourself Your Evil is Morally Justified" by Brain Let, you'd love it OP

>>11312242
>my professor never mentioned them
>therefore they aren't serious intellectuals
Bravo

>>11314873
Cringe meter broken. The jewish brainwashing in this one is strong.

>>11314873

>>11312213

Thanks everyone for the recs

Read Plato, Kant, Hegel
Secondary read: Nietzsche, Marx
To understand evil.

oh how /lit/ changed

Like 3 years ago a lot of people were unironically marxist and their favorite book was The Stranger.

I thought the transition was for the better at first, but now we are heading for a new age of tasteless plebism.

>>11312213
here OP
https://mega.nz/#F!N1JzSZLZ!k-7Aw1U7E4xpCfbaLq5o9g

>>11315626
those days were not especialyl good and the marxists back then were boring moralists, with milquetoast androgynous brains but too plain to even be trannies.. the marxists we have now are beasts. thinking about the /lit/ wasteland days of L'Etranger and Ayn Rand makes me a little ill.. the /pol/ influx is embarrassing and, at moments, bad enough to make the board unbearable, even so i think some good minds have been salvaged and uplifted among the pol migrants...

The Reactionary Mind

>>11312242
Evola was always ignore but Spenglers influence is vast across the academy and the ideological spectrum

>>11312242
>>11313669
>>11313720
>>11313919
>>11313972
>>11314873

>>11315827
This is great, thanks!

>>11312213
SIEGE

>>11314873
/thread

>>11317571
*snap*

>>11316993
You're welcome!

>>11312268
midwit: the post

>>11319369
this

>history of the far-right
you can read every philosopher up to Marx and they will be far-right

>>11319876
I’m pretty sure he means far-right for their time. That they were considered far right by their contemporaries.

Germany and Italy were the most important right wing stuff, with france, Britain, and America behind. In that order.
Look for general books on the Konservative Revolution, look for how the socialists in Italy went from far left to far right fascists, and for how they changed the other countries in europe.
I don't know much about post ww2 yet, but Threats to Democracy seems like a good book for Italy

>>11312242
>the guys who disagree with me are all unintelligent therefore im excused from hearing out their points of view.
to think there are people who unironically think like this

>>11314873
>evil
fucking child, go and read fiction

>>11312242
you cant be serious people like Heidegger and Wittgenstein praised Spengler, he's got fans from all over the intellectual landscape

Check out Roger Griffin's latest work on Modernism and Fascism, and Gregor's work on Neofascism, as well as Griffin's earlier work on fascism, Ernst Nolte's Three Faces of Fascism, Goodrick-Clarke on esoteric fascism and George Mosse on German ideology

>>11314188
...in recognition of your subject-related dubs.

>>11321414
Forgot: and Fritz Stern on Kulturpessimismus

>>11315827
this link is dead, can you update?

>>11312229
Have you other guides?

>>11312242
> serious intellectuals

Evola was plenty serious, he took himself a bit too seriously. I hate it when people use the phrase 'serious intellectual'. Intellectuals shouldn't be so ultra serious.

> Never stay up on the barren heights of cleverness, but come down into the green valleys of silliness.

- Wittgenstein

>>11321888
You shouldn't be so quick to speak about intellectuals when your go-to example is an unoriginal, subversive jew.

bump

>>11316993
>>11321864
ill re-add it soon keep posted

>>11312242
>neither of them are considered serious intellectuals
Because they prioritized truth over fashion. Of course the sophists don't consider them serious intellectuals.

>>11321864
>>11315827
>>11316993
ok back
fascist italy mega
https://mega.nz/#F!kpZVQJ5S!ZL3GMcseeXELDL2saDtjDQ
fascism books and other stuff
https://mega.nz/#F!JoIxWB4K!4G9XBaM6fO4R4JDsrHfl2A

>>11313950
Do you know where I could find a pdf of this book, I haven't been able to find one?

>>11323661
>prioritized truth over fashion
>wizard LARPer

if you're a leftycuck fuck off to /litpat/

Any book about american politics lmao

I think this chart might help, but it's made by some of /pol/ so take it with a mine of salt

>>11324043
thank you, it's great

>>11324510
OMG. I save it, thanks

>>11314188
This

>>11312213
I don't know of anything comprehensive but pic related is kind of the history of Evola's thought from from his dadaist era until his death. Haven't read it yet but I heard its good.

Deleuze and Guattari were the last right-wing thinkers.

>>11319369
lol are u mad that your ideology is founded in a hilarious reclamation effort against the left and center? isn’t it odd how you have nothing aside from chamberlain, spengler, schmitt, de maistre, rosenberg? what fun it must be to be a reactionary intellectual. you can go read vico and machiavelli and Thucydides, Rousseau and Hobbes :)

>>11326987
Big if true.

best book about some of the more obscure right-wing zoo inhabitants of fin de siecle europe. slight disadvantage is that the author is convinced people like heydrich or goebbels were self-hating cryptojews. but nevertheless well researched.

>>11328245
just realized an english translation is online. ToC gives you an idea of the material density
https://archive.org/details/BeforeHitlerCameAHistoricalStudy1975-DietrichBronder

>>11312242
>spengler is not a serious intellectual

bump

>>11313950
>>11324251

Good review of the work here:

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2018/05/25/review-view-from-the-right-a-critical-anthology-of-contemporary-ideas-volume-i/