/lit/ - Literature

None

Quine

ur mom

Mainländer

Kayne

my diary desu

>>11276376
Depends on what. Most philosophers were right about something and wrong about everything else. Take Hegel for example or Feuerbach or Nietzsche.

I think that Kant has one of the most consistent works since if you take his premises almost all of his work makes sense as it's worth accepting.

Congratulations! It seems you have made a thinly-veiled chat thread in order to gossip like a school girl! I hope you find the connection and community you're looking for OP, everybody deserves to feel included!

>>11276376
me

Rene Guenon and Augosto Del Noce.

We need religion, community, and tradition.

>>11276376

Donald Trump

>>11276496
Spooky

>>11276376
Jesus.

>>11276402
Feeling more bitchy than usual today, anon?

>>11276376
Nick Land

>>11276399
>kant
no

>>11276402
nothing wrong with wanting to feel like a school girl anon

All of them.

>>11276376
Kant was right about literally everything, the madman

>>11276376

All of them.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blind_men_and_an_elephant

>>11276376
Rousseau
Kant
Hegel
Nietzsche
Heidegger

All of them

What the shitting stupid fucking question is that

Jacques Ellul

>>11276898
Pass the bong.

>>11276891

>I can solve everything with logic!

>>11277760
That's not what he argued at all.

>>11276496

>>11277684
/thread because he's a sociologist (much smarter than philosophers)

>>11276376
René Guenon

>>11277765
Yes it is. I'm not reading any more replies from you. You're unreasonable.

>>11277799
>You're unreasonable.

No, I just don't try to solve everything with logic.

>>11277684
>>11277789
lol

bubs

>>11277796
This, except he wasn't a philosopher.

>>11277843
>No, I just don't try to solve everything with logic.

That fedora tip was heard on Mars

>>11276376
Guenon

Ayn Rand

I see by OP's image the mods are half-asleep today?

>>11276376
i would cum so hard on her massive racist titties

>>11277933
There is not even one alternative to Kant.

Heidegger was right and everyone else was wrong except the absolute mad man Parmenides.

>>11277789
There are a lot smarter than sociologists

>>11277961
Whats wrong with the picture?

>>11277998

/lit/ is a blue board.

>>11276376
It seems to me, having read only the Greeks and Spinoza, that Spinoza was right.

>>11277979
>>11276891

>Reason functions by the light of the Intellect, but Kantian critical philosophy in striving to reach an integral relativism—which is “a contradiction in itself and thus a pure absurdity”—becomes a play of mirrors that throws everything into subjective doubt and leads inevitably to existentialism. These
philosophers in their “arrogant unconsciousness” would “kill with their petty vitriolic thoughts” the “great spokesmen of metaphysics”. It totally escapes their atrophied imagination that logic “is perfectly consistent only when exceeding itself”. Integral rationalism in its turn is a consequence of the tendency in Aristotelian metaphysics—unlike that of Plato and Plotinus— towards exteriorization; “the Aristotelian Pandora’s box is scientism coupled with sensationalism”. The mischief comes from the Church’s having lent an interested ear—a factor favoring the development of the Renaissance mentality.

>>11276376
Why must titties be so distracting?

>>11278049
>>11277976
You guys are gay, the main attraction is definitely her lips.

>>11276376

>>11278037
What a bunch of non arguments lol

>>11278037
I'm not sure I follow his point. I thought it was Kant who originally argued that the form of our reasoning cannot lead us to the content.

>This is just what happened to the critical philosophy, which has been swept away in turn and through its own fault by existentialism in all its forms.
He seems more critical of the products of Kantian philosophy than of Kant himself. But not liking the implications of Kant's philosophy is no argument against it.

Revelation hasn't been seriously considered in epistemology since premodern times, the 1960's don't count.

>>11278032
You're not wrong.

Derrida

>>11276376
Wittgenstein and Nietzsche because they ended the whole affair

>>11276376
Boy that tattoo was a mistake.... And are Russians/Ukrainians really taking up Nazism?! I can't think of a country that Hitler destroyed/traumatized more throughly than Russia. But to address the question. U.G. Krishnamurti

>>11278223
Ok Poland....my bad

>>11278218
Derrida the spectre, Derrida the monstrous French irrationalist, Derrida the mythical horned beast who needn’t actually be read or encountered in any substantial way in order to be understood to be unconditionally awful. Derrida the byword for all that is bad and unholy.

Jordan B Peterson

>>11278240
De-rrideux
The Semite behind the curtain

>>11278240
>>11278251

>>11278236
Poles used to barely be considered human but nowadays they are pretty much the last heirs of indo-aryan civilisation. Nazism itself is pretty ridiculous though, I have to agree.