[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 60 KB, 510x680, {9E2131A2-2DE0-43C3-AE3A-9E292074C8A1}Img100.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11161941 No.11161941 [Reply] [Original]

>> No.11162015

>>11161941
Does it have anything in common with Aristotle's Ethics other than title?

>> No.11162039

>>11161941
Hegel’s Phenomenology
Nietzsche’s Beyond good and Evil
Heidegger’s What is Called Thinking?

>> No.11162053

Hegel's Phenomologoy of Spinoza

>> No.11163034

>>11161941
No, Spinoza is perfect thinker andEthics is perfect work

>> No.11163399

>>11161941

It is too soft and lachrymose. At least Leibniz took a position.

>> No.11163404

>>11163399
Leibniz is incoherent garbage that was outdated before it was even written.

>> No.11163415
File: 61 KB, 470x580, _low001200501ill171.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11163415

>>11163399
>At least Leibniz took a position.
Spinoza was so much more explicit about his system than Leibniz, how many levels of psude are you on right now? Spinoza's position was so radical it was commonplace for Spinozans to be executed by the state.