[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 8 KB, 472x325, impressed.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11134399 No.11134399 [Reply] [Original]

ITT pseud concepts

I'll start: "Being"

>> No.11134414
File: 312 KB, 1368x1824, 234543654654645.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11134414

>>11134399
Just remember folks, concepts without intuitions are empty, intuitions without concepts are blind

>> No.11134417

>>11134399
Spectacle

>> No.11134508

>>11134414
kant was wrong about that

>> No.11134513

>non-being

>> No.11134515

>becoming

>> No.11134521

>the Other

>> No.11134522

>>11134521
Ah, I hate this one

>> No.11134524

>>11134399
>pseuds

>> No.11134534

>exploitation
>oppression
I say this because they are almost always used by theorists outside of morality. as in, they are used to elicit a moral response from you without ever covering why they are morally wrong

>> No.11134538

>>11134534
durr u have to restate your framework everytime you write something

>> No.11134545

>>11134538
I'm talking about people who never did so in the first place. its just like when laypeople expect you to share their concerns on the get go

>> No.11134598

>the outside

>> No.11134607

>>11134534
>>exploitation
>>oppression
Exploitation is a fundamental part of any natural process, both organinc and inorganic.

>> No.11134609

>intelligence
>motivation
>discourse
>cultural Marxism
>X-function instead of X
>selfhood
>...

>> No.11134613

>>11134607
most things don't explode

>> No.11134618

>>11134613
nibba wut?

>> No.11134644
File: 407 KB, 943x943, png;base6455cbd8a62feb9f0a.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11134644

>>11134399

>> No.11134775
File: 2.37 MB, 440x440, 1494224351418.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11134775

>>11134598

>> No.11134778

>plot
>character

>> No.11134793

>>11134644
imagine unironically believing in diagrams

>> No.11135022

>>11134521
i know someone who says "othering" irl

>> No.11135028

>>11135022
i mean could be worse, "objectification" has been mainstream for 20-30 years and who tf knows what it actually means

>> No.11135037

>>11134521
ame here to post this based

>> No.11135063

>>11134399
>tabula rasa

>> No.11135080

>>11134399

"always-already"

I want to strangle whoever came up with this nonsense

>> No.11135128

>>11134414
>intuitions without concepts are blind
On the contrary, that's the only way to truly see

>> No.11135132

>>11135128
dude weed lmao

>> No.11135142

>the inner self

>> No.11135143

>>11135132
intoxicants are haram

>> No.11135224

>>11134414
t:the most evil man in history

>> No.11135232

>God

>> No.11135260

Incorrect, not pseud:
>>11134399
>>11134414
>>11134513
>>11134515
>>11134521
>>11134524
>>11134534
>>11134609
>>11134778
>>11135232

Correct, pseud:
>>11135063

This has been a fucking garbage thread kys everyone.

>> No.11135278

>love

Yeah, right.

>> No.11135295

>>11135278
The quintessential pseud concept, if there ever was one.

>> No.11135296

>privilege

>> No.11135298

>>11135295
t. kissless virgin

>> No.11135324

>>11135298
t. lovesick fool

>> No.11135336

>>11135260
incorrect

>> No.11135343
File: 59 KB, 400x188, 1512426423574.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11135343

>>11134534
>Objective Morality

>> No.11135353

>>11135343
>morality

>> No.11135630

"dialectic"

>> No.11135640

Here's one
>pseud

>> No.11135648
File: 48 KB, 1280x817, Feynmann_Diagram_Gluon_Radiation.svg.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11135648

>>11134793

>> No.11135649

>>11135343
lol bro everything is subjective, it's so obvious
I have never read a philosophy book in my life tho

>> No.11135654

>>11135649
>here's one hand here's another xdddddd
Kys

>> No.11135768

>>11135260
t. butthurt pseud

>> No.11135792

>>11135649
>Lol ur not as smart as me I read book!
It's kind of adorable that you're willing to treat basic ass "objective good vs objective evil" as though it was a complicated or controversial idea. I was raised Catholic, it's not that I'm unfamiliar with the arguments for objective Morality, it's that I haven't encountered one that isn't rooted in word games about pre-newtonian understandings of the world, or otherwise outright superstition.
It is extremely obvious, to the point of practically being self evident, that people experience reality subjectively. Unless you'd like to present an argument for why it isn't

>> No.11136580

>>11135260
my nigga

>> No.11136605

>>11134399
I have actually heard people irl use the word 'Spirit.' Took a lot of effort to not burst out laughing.

>> No.11136777
File: 198 KB, 1061x1500, 1dd76d916c438586008fe0a8b6efb44d.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11136777

>>11136605
Spirit is basically just the metaphysical qualities of a person, place, thing, idea, and perhaps an action. It's a lot less of a mouthful to say that people shake hands before and after wrestling matches "in the spirit of sportsmanship", than "for the purpose of reflecting, celebrating, or actualizing the metaphysical qualities of sportsmanship", and it's closer to what the wrestlers are consciously doing, "spirit" being both a literal shorthand and a mental shortcut to the gist of understanding what spirit actually is - which is all that anyone really ever needs to communicate the idea of spirit and have it be understood enough to work. All these words I'm using to try to push my understanding of the term are only an explanation of a common experience that someone could only not understand because he is living in a context that is disconnected from spirituality.

>> No.11136830

>>11134534
They presuppose very questionable notions of justice yet are treated like scientific facts. The postwar era really is a a disgusting place.

>> No.11136952

>>11136777
>the metaphysical qualities of sportsmanship

>> No.11136976

>>11134399
Everything ever penned by Alan Watts.

>> No.11136992

>>11135260
This tbqh

>> No.11137005

>>11135260
agree strongly

cultural marxism is difficult but i think its a valid concept

>> No.11137037

>>11136777
>being such a brainlet that you're tricked by an amphiboly
back to phil 101

>> No.11137149

>>11136777
>implying 99% of people don't use it as synonym for the supernatural religious soul.

>> No.11137681
File: 76 KB, 758x611, a cuca.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11137681

>>11135022
I knew someone who would say "another-ing" at first I thought it was a weird slip but they kept saying it consistently and in different conjugations "another", "anothered"...
In mainstream circles people tend to use "other" as a term for social exclusion (usually cognitive) and I think it's as good as any other way to describe the phenomenon. There are definitely more interesting ways to apply it, though

>>11135080
this is a fault of the English language that doesn't have many words that carry aspect.

>>11136976
The "problem" of Alan Watts has never been conceptual. It's in the lack of rigor. His goal I don't think was ever to approach concepts academically but to create samples for soundcloud artists to use decades later.

>> No.11137700

>>11134521
>hasn't angered the transcendent other

>> No.11137715

>>11137149
How is that any different from the wholeness of being (experiencing)?

>> No.11138364

>deconstruction

>> No.11139547

>zeitgeist
>holistic

>> No.11140714
File: 30 KB, 600x639, 1525863483470.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11140714

>will to power

>> No.11142182

>>11134399
human condition

>> No.11142185

>>11135260
>found the marxist

>> No.11142213

>>11134521
pls be trolling