/lit/ - Literature

Plan your outline better. If you see you are lacking in material in a certain part you can expand/fortify/add counter examples to deal with, ect. One of the easiest ways to both lengthen and stengthen a paper is to find a secondary source that disagrees with your position and show how they are mistaken or how your point deals with the issue better.

>>11125679
That just means you are dumb and unable to think.

infinity chest and jerk. moody lamb without some scared hollywood megaton stress sublimation. aww. a rabbi walking through the walls he inside white house looking at bill and his lover. geopoliticks.

>>11125717
Shut the fuck up nerd before I steal your intelligence and make you the stupid one. I don't think it's a weakness that I'm incapable of droning on endlessly.

>>11125692

Just give more examples. e.g. if you say:

>All William Faulkner's characters are mad. Here's Thomas Sutpen as an example.

It's easy to go back and insert:

>Here's Quentin Compson as another example.

>>11125736
>>11125692
Yeah I'll take this advice and just regurgitate other's opinions, thanks.

>>11125760
Don't regurgitate anon, you actually have to try and engage with ideas that are different than your own. Show you have not only read them, but that you understand them enough to use their work dialectically to advance your thesis. Don't just find relevant quotes to paste in for reference (I've been there done that it doesn't fool (competent) professors).

>>11125886
Oh don't worry anon I understand. The only time I ever lazily copypasted something was when I used Carl Sagan's little speech about the blue dot