[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 285 KB, 567x667, adapt.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1078433 No.1078433 [Reply] [Original]

Hey /lit/fags wondering if you could reccomend me some great books for vocabulary building. I don't mean like 'Dorian Gray' florid as this isn't actually that florid. But like something that will fucking floor me and be intellectually stimulating.
The best book I've read like this so far was Lolita. moar?

>> No.1078436

Shakespeare is the most complete course on English vocabulary available.

>> No.1078449

>>1078436
surely thou art in jest prithee whoreson etc...

>> No.1078450

>>1078436
I love shakespeare but right now I'm looking for something with a more contemporary prose. It can by all means be unique, like Fitzgerald, but not really wanting to read ye old English right now.

>> No.1078460

>>1078450
Shakespeare is the first work of modern English.

>> No.1078464

So you've read Lolita. Well that's pretty much it then. Nobody's done anything else as intricate or novel since.

>> No.1078466
File: 24 KB, 309x475, 0679725229.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1078466

start here.

>> No.1078475

>>1078460
sir, though the words of the bard may serve thee in good stead with thy lips pressed against the ample bosum of the rennaissance fair strumpet, it would behoove thee to capitalize on the texts of the new world should thou seek fortune there.

>> No.1078505
File: 130 KB, 316x475, Brief Interviews.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1078505

>>1078466

great book, but start here? pff.

try some dfw. brief interviews with hideous men

>> No.1078516

>>1078464
yeah I was going to suggest Lolita until I got to that last sentence

>>1078436
>Shakespeare is the most complete course on English vocabulary available.

yeah, if you want to pick up plenty of archaic usage

>> No.1078532

>>1078516
Why the hell wouldn't you? It allows for versatility. I've been told I evoke the spirit of Christopher Marlowe so well an initiate can't tell the difference.

>> No.1078543

I guess I'm a language fundamentalist so I may be alone on this one but don't you WANT to know where the words you use came from, and how and when and why? It's fascinating