/lit/ - Literature

>>10637777
Green is only possible in an extremely homogeneous population with an extremely high sense of trust.
Funniest thing is that, politically, there's zero difference between purple and green. They're both "libertarian", there's no promise of anything, green is impossible when everyone's purple at heart.

>try to get into goodreads
>2/3 of the books I read are in my native language, not English
>book entries are a mess, covers are missing, authors are written either with their English name or in my language
I want to make my life easier and more organised, not a bigger mess.

>>10640308
You can manually put in isbn number and find the exact book you want

https://www.goodreads.com/user/show/7002468-carlos-eduardo

R8 and masturb8, my dudes.

>>10640424
Also, post most read authors.

>>10639504
I recommend "The Good Person of Szechwan" by Bertolt Brecht for that feel. Read this, leave the alt-right crap out, you sound like some fedora-tipping edgelord.

I'm not a lefty, but I'm still down for a goodreads thread. Why do you gotta discriminate my dude

https://www.goodreads.com/user/show/77147001-june-summers

>>10640444
Not an objectivist by the way. Rand's books were one of my guilty pleasures a couple of years ago.

>>10640552
>Woyzeck
Is that the same as the Herzog movie?

>>10639504
>everyone's purple at heart.
>this is what american middleschoolers really tell themselves

>>10640577
It is the unfinished play the movie is based on.
It is great.

>>10637777
Why is it called anarcho communism and not mental retardation like it should be?

>>10640583
American middle schoolers tell themselves everyone is green at heart

>>10637777
>>>/soc/

>>10640308
Become a librarian and edit the data to your liking.
Or just make yourself an .xml file with the books you've read.

>>10640552
Holy cow, are you a girl? I've been seriously wondering whether there were any girls that use this board regularly, and I was starting to doubt it.

>>10643051
there were a few in the last goodreads thread

>>10643054
Really? What compels them to come to this place? And so they shitpost just like guys do? My curiosity is piqued

>>10637777
Kill yourself back to leftypol. Saged.

>>10640447
You're a massive trench coat-draped neckbeard who's projecting. Embarrassing and spergy as fuck.

>>10643057
It's because goodreads threads are narcissistic, self-directed, about identity and posturing. Even if a wom*n reads a book, she doesn't really absorb and synthesize the information-- she can make twitter "call outs" that are totally woke and dunk on the uneducated guy hard, but she can't hold it out in a social environment like anonymous imageboards, where that type of ostracization is nonexistent and posters must simultaneously defend the intellectual content of their arguments and anybody that's fine with just calling them a faggot. So the f*male resorts to posturing, lists and profiles containing books they've bought (but usually haven't fully digested). They're seriously really obsessed with themselves and their image on an astounding level. You know the personality charts, the ones where you draw an image of yourself as you are now, as you were some years ago, rate your intelligence, etc? Ever wondered why those threads attracted a disproportionately high amount of g*rls, compared to the-- thankfully-- abysmally low amount of actual f*male posters on this site? It's because of course they'd take an opportunity to brag about their identity, how they're emo and oglisexual or whatever and a democratic socialist and ugh, their stupid parents wish they were making more money, and they NEVER want to be one of those whore bimbos, and their ideal boyfriend (but they already have a boyfriend btw so its irrelevant, teehee uwu~ toodles!! xD) is a neurotic trust fund beardman who's funny and wealthy but also docile enough to let her fuck tyrone and only interfere to occasionally bark jokes he picked up on from rick and morty and the chapo trap house reddit page at her. It doesn't take mgtow redpill pseudoscience evopsych to pick up on how self-aggrandizing and obsessed w*men are, and if you haven't, you're lying to yourself. aaand post

>>10637777
you fucking faggot kill yourself
>KEKED

>>10643057
It's almost like women are regular people that could be interested in books

>>10643217
Either really good subtle bait that checks all the boxes concerning what a Reddit user would sound like, or the literal worst unarchived comment live on this website 4chan dot org right now.

>>10643243
*reddit
didnt mean to capitalize it

https://www.goodreads.com/user/show/54260515

>>10640583
>everyone's purple at heart.
Way to take the bloke way out of context
He is talking about it as a conditional, not a statement of fact

>>10640595
It is fucking horrible and overrated, what a plebeian opinion to hold.

>>10644532
At least the anit-semitic parts feel out of place, otherwise it was a fun read,

How do you guys see these lists by authors? When I go to "my books" it's not sorted this way

>>10644805
when you get to my books, at the left there is most read authors, blue link under "my reading activity".

>>10645086
tfw only 2 autors with more than 2 books