[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 26 KB, 325x499, 41aKSq5qAZL._SX323_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10521124 No.10521124 [Reply] [Original]

Is this a good introduction to Jung?

>> No.10522204

Yes

>> No.10522218

No

>> No.10522242

Maybe

>> No.10522245

i don't know

>> No.10522247

>>10522204
>>10522218
>>10522242
>>10522245

Only relevant answers in this thread

>> No.10522250

>>10522204
>>10522218
>>10522242
>>10522245
Can you repeat the question?

>> No.10522252

Joseph Campbell is plebish but if it's primary texts who cares? you can always go to the source later

>> No.10522254

Don't read yung, read homer and you'll see he encompasses all of modern thought ;-^)

>> No.10522257
File: 79 KB, 383x403, 1500173497574.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10522257

>>10522247
Way to go screwing up the streak.

>> No.10522435

Would anyone ever think of Jung if it weren't for Peterson?

>> No.10522438

>>10522435
Would anyone ever think of Peterson if it wasn't for Jung?

>> No.10522460

>>10522435
>Would anyone ever think of Jung if it weren't for Peterson?
Before /lit/ became an alter from which to worship Peterson, Jung used to be ridiculed. Regarded in the same light as Deepak Chopra or The Secret.

You'd get sent to >>>/x/ for posting anything like: "Alchemy is central to Jung's hypothesis of the collective unconscious. Jung argues for a reevaluation of the symbolism of Alchemy as being intimately related to the psychoanalytical process. Using a cycle of dreams of one of his patients he shows how the symbols used by the Alchemists occur in the psyche as part of the reservoir of mythological images drawn upon by the individual in their dream states. Jung draws an analogy between the Great Work of the Alchemists and the process of reintegration and individuation of the psyche in the modern psychiatric patient."

>> No.10522464

>>10522438
Yes, all I'm saying is Peterson made Jung fashionable the same way zizek makes Lacan fashionable.

>> No.10522493

>>10522464
Retard

>> No.10522543

>>10522247
C-C-C-COMBOBREAKER

>> No.10522640

>>10522464
You're really misusing the term "fashionable" here. Jung is extremely influential and was undoubtedly a deep thinker of dominating intelligence and education, this is undeniable.

Anyway, Peterson is known to some people on the internet. Thats it. His core "fanbase" doesnt consist of millions of people worldwide or anything like that. Carl Jung is relevant even today for academics and even anyone just looking to get into an accessible interpretation of esotericism.