[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 44 KB, 251x396, A183D38F-7761-4BA5-8CFC-CEC16AAEAC4B.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10370310 No.10370310 [Reply] [Original]

what does /lit/ think?

>> No.10370320

Old fashioned red and blue 3D glasses looked a lot cooler than they gay ass sunglasses we have now.

>> No.10370394

Debord is /ourguy/

>> No.10370469

anyone else?

>> No.10370471

>>10370469
Read Debord's Comments on the Society of the Spectacle when you're done

>> No.10370472

>>10370471
i read his comments book before reading society of the spectacle

>> No.10370475

picked it up at the store. Haven't read it yet.
It has a catchy name and a good cover, lit seems to like it when its mentioned. Seems to have a novelty format that I will either love or hate.

>>10370472
How can you understand commentary on something you haven't read.
Understanding things in retrospect is a waste of time.

>> No.10370485

>>10370475
once you actually read society of the spectacle and read the comments you will understand why i started with the comments

>> No.10371042

>>10370310
love it

>> No.10371056

>>10370310
Fuck debord, I remember becoming unable to fucking enjoy kpop after reading this shit
All I could see is soulless music and slave "artists"

>> No.10371060

Wtf I hate spectacle now!

>> No.10371067

I regret reading it, just pick up McLuhan and Baudrillard instead.

>> No.10371070

>>10370310
Basically a marxist describing what /pol/ calls cultural marxism

>> No.10371074

Vaneigem>Debord

>> No.10371093

>>10371056
good.
kpop is trash

>> No.10371151

>>10371056
It took you a fucking book to realise that kpop is trash? What's your iq? Less than 90, right?

>> No.10371210
File: 1.17 MB, 263x351, joo.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10371210

>>10371056
>>10371151
Kpop is for fapping and nothing else.

>> No.10371223

>>10371056
>he had to have someone else make his opinion of shitty pop music for him

>> No.10371228
File: 16 KB, 200x211, autisticlisping.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10371228

>>10371210
>watching kpop for women and not androgynous men

>> No.10371229
File: 99 KB, 896x706, 49416e6a10d283c008b1e2f06b35076b1a4748dd.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10371229

>>10371070
This desu

>> No.10371257

>>10371056
>>10371093
>>10371151
>>10371210
>>10371223
wow, /lit/ has some real shit taste
You guys are not welcomed on /mu/

>> No.10371260

>>10370310
His commentary on it are better

>> No.10371263

>>10371074
hwo come

>> No.10371269

>>10371151
I'm really interested in this book, what, if any, previous knowledge of philosophy or other fields are necessary before I read it?

>> No.10371272

>>10371269
None, its not even philosophy just entry level cultural criticism

>> No.10371274

>>10371269
just read up on May 1968 and Situationism
Adorno's The Culture Industry is essential too

>> No.10371275

>>10371269
heidegger, mcluhan?

>> No.10371276

>>10371269
Not really, just have a basic understanding of marxism (Marx's commodity fetishism section to be precise)

>> No.10371278
File: 111 KB, 1200x1200, MTE5NDg0MDU0OTAxMjYxODM5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10371278

>>10371276
>Marx's commodity fetishism section

Ah yes, the famous commodity fetishism "section" of Marx

>> No.10371279

Marxist discovers Marx was a social conservative: the book.

>> No.10371299

>>10371278
>Capital vol.1, chapter 1; section 4 - The Fetishism of Commodities and the Secret Thereof
It's only 20 pages or so anon

>> No.10371334
File: 122 KB, 500x500, 1511191408174.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10371334

>>10371056
>i need someone to tell me kpop is shit

>> No.10371348

>>10371056
Adorno made me hate jazz.

>> No.10371385

>>10371056
damn thats so deep...

>> No.10371402

>>10371348
kek

>> No.10371446

>>10371278
It is quite literary covered in the last section of the first chapter of the first part of Volume 1 of Das Kapital though.

>> No.10371610

i watched the first twenty minutes of the documentary and thought it was good but i was also falling asleep, might read the book sometime

>> No.10371649

>>10371610
I found the book easier than the movie.

>>10371278
lmfao

>> No.10371655

>>10371263
Vaneigem is more life affirming than Debord, which rub some people better than endless repetitions of Hegel or Feuerbach but with two different words and preceded / followed by similar stuff.

not me though I fucking love Debord

>> No.10372113
File: 696 KB, 1920x1676, 1491127918309.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10372113

>>10371257
Yea okay like that is some high bar

>> No.10372124

>>10371655
life affirming is such a huge buzzword, i automatically think of someone as a 4chan autist internet kid when they use that word

>> No.10372125
File: 389 KB, 700x654, d95eb5e0d8a6840f36e9cdeeefaeb41b.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10372125

>>10371056
You should be grateful, gookshit is awful

>> No.10372131

>>10371151
legit I love that "Like Like" song

>> No.10373350

>>10371056
>kpop
why do people enjoy that shit anyway

>> No.10373745
File: 132 KB, 305x479, 1512072617914.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10373745

Detour them bitches anons. The capital turned to an image/meme.

>> No.10373770

>>10372125

come back after you learn what your slurs mean
a long, long time after

>> No.10375049

>>10371056
>watching kpop for the "music"
Even roasties don't do this

>> No.10375249

fine for teen years

but philosophically lazy

quite irrelevant, just listen to angry music or something

>> No.10375293

>>10371348
Adorno made me hate Adorno.

>> No.10375374

>>10375293
>>10375293

Adorno and Nietzsche are part of a lonely group of philosophers whose writing and its formal qualities matches its content.

>> No.10375418

>>10370310
One of the greatest book ever written about cultural liberalism. Baudrillard’s work on simulacras and hyperreality is also remarkable.

>> No.10375424

>>10370310

It will make you understand the meme era

>> No.10375436

It was written by a university student in the time of an economic boom, so it necessarily neglects the producer under capitalism. It is spot on regarding the consumer though.

>> No.10375443

Made me delete my instagram desu

>> No.10375585

>>10375049
do u even know what a roastie is?

>> No.10375591

>>10371275
Heidegger to read Debord, wtf?
Just know a bit of Marx breh.

>> No.10375598

>>10371278
>>10371299
It's a pretty famous section and pretty much the only place he discusses it (the surviving remnants of young humanist Marx in the later work). brainlet