/lit/ - Literature

>>17125467
>everyone German other than
>doesn't list Wittgenstein

Kill yourself now.

>>17129566
> Muh Schopenhauer pessimist
As dark as his outlook is, in the end it made me deal with life in a much better way.

>>17125368
Nagarjuna

Marx
Deleuze

>>17125368
All of them.

Here's a general rule.
Applies to every single book, movie, song, videogame, whatever.

If it was made by a kike, do not fucking consume it. Literally. Just. Don't.
It is guaranteed to contain nothing useful or interesting and has a 99% chance of being poisonous to your brain.

Everything else can mostly be figured intuitively, just don't be afraid of not finishing a bad piece.

>>17125384
Philosophy is vital for good /sci/ence, otherwise you are left with science-pseuds like the right half of pic related.
also cope faggot >>17129220

>>17125467

>>17130454
kek was about to say that.

>>17125658
>Newtonian time
You haven't read Newton. Whoever you're referencing also didn't read Newton

>>17125384
bbbbbased

>>17125368
Deleuze for sure, and probably whoever he was friends with too.

>>17132313
Foucault, right?

>>17131005
You just made me get rid of a considerate portion from my reading list for the next year. Thank you sir

>>17125384
Excluding Math, those are are all grounded on materialism and materialism is depressing and sociopathic. Just because it’s rigorous and empirical doesn’t make it valuable.

More like which philosopher isn't useless amirite

>>17133523
What books were you going to read anon?
Where they written by Dawkins et al.?

>>17131554
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absolute_space_and_time

>>17132313
Based.

>>17131005
The Dawkins quote isn't that bad. The first one is even complimenting philosophers.

>>17129566
>(who is cool, if you turn him right-wing via Nietzsche)
Cringe

>>17125384
>Why yes, my memory palace is in fact a white room with an interactive iPad on the wall, how did you know?

>>17125368
all of them probably have something somewhat interesting to say, though post-modernists can become kind of annoying at times, especially contemporary ones like judith butler

>>17131105
you and 10 other people, it seems

>>17135734
Ew, that is disgusting.
My memory palace is a Gothic style Castle that exists in perpetual darkness, with many dungeons, artwork, statues and prisoners, all of which are mythological creatures, specifically demons.
With a very seductive succubus that acts as a tour guide, and encourages me.

Young Adult philosophy like schopenhauer or camus

>>17125467
npc

The one that one coworker makes fun of you for reading

>>17125467
>philosophy
>Freud
Uwotm8?

>>17135705
You're joking right...

This thread is shite.

>>17125384
As a STEM "chad" I would say science could benefit from a lot more philosophy so that the STEM chuds can reflect on what they are actually doing.

>>17125368
aristotle

>>17125368
the ones that don't agree with me

>>17125384
based proud robot calculator

>>17125670

Deleuze isn't anyone's anything.

>>17126664

What about the rigids?

>>17129566

>If you turn him right-wing via Nietzsche

Lmao imagine having the arrogance to think that one of the most complex minds of the 20th century is at the whim of your amateur philological acrobatics.

>>17136877
top kek

>>17128894
Absolutely blessed

>>17125368
Commies, anarchists, socialists, degenerates, Jews, etc.

>>17125731
implying it's reddit to not read women
dilate

>>17126021
actual retard

>>17126083
subhuman nonwhite detected

>>17125467
cringe

>>17129566
cringe

>>17125368
all of them, didn't you watch Soul (2020)?

Any thought resulting in dead-end philosophies, namely Existentialists, Sollipsists, anti-Natalists, etc.

>>17125368
Any philosopher who was not also a warrior.

>>17136896
That is literally what Deleuze did to other thinkers. Interpret them in ways that might seem blasphemous, yet have an internal logic.
So let a man have his interpretations.

>>17125368
Just read what you are interested in. The only waste of time philosopher is the one(s) that you don't care about. If you ask this because you want to get a broader knowledge of philosophy, and you are not sure who to skip. I can recommend you to read books about the history of philosophy or you can ask yourself what are you especially interested in. ( I mean like for example: do you want to know how does mind and body relate or how political systems justify themself etc.) And go from there.

>>17138732
Only good answer in this thread. Rest are pseuds in a dick measuring contest

>>17137908
Redpill me on Soul (2020).

>>17125368
I think autism like Kant or Hegel is beyond worthless, but if people like reading that shit it's fine. Whatever floats your boat.

All the ones who aren't Christian, and I say this as a former atheist retard