/lit/ - Literature

>>3219296
it obviously can be explained into words, there's a fucking book on it. any attempt to explain is just gonna be met with a bunch of annoying questions that kant thought up a couple hundred years before you and adressed in HIS GODDAMN BOOK. this is the gist: you can extrapolate morality from reason, the categorical imperative follows from a) only do those things everyone could do, b) don't use people as a means to an end, c) act as if your moral reasonings are law.

you can direct any nitpicking to kant's grave --->

>>3219292
t'es mechante, dede