[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.23379799 [View]
File: 496 KB, 1064x1064, 1B273F1C-9BD7-4D54-A845-89DFA06039D3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23379799

>>23378215
>fixes his philosophy in his path

>> No.22296685 [View]
File: 496 KB, 1064x1064, E6C5AA60-0F6E-4B76-B1AF-97073A61912D.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22296685

>>22296483
>>>Intellektual Anschauung just doesn't exist ok. but- IT JUST DOESN'T OK.
absolutely demolished by picrel

>> No.22214855 [View]
File: 496 KB, 1064x1064, 5342B85B-0227-4B6A-BA7B-A269E59EA79F.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22214855

>>22214850
Schelling develops his criticism of Kant in 1795's “Of the I as Principle of Philosophy or On the Unconditioned in Human Knowledge” by saying that he must “depict the results of critical philosophy in their regression to the last principles of all knowledge” because “the Critique of Pure Reason cannot possibly be the way of philosophy as a science”. His evidence is that the first Critique “names the only possible forms of sensible intuition, space and time, without having examined them according to a principle”, while “[t]he categories are set up according to the table of the functions of judgment, but the latter are not set up according to any principle”. For Schelling, one has an “interest in truth” only if one is “interested in the question of the highest principle of all knowledge”, i.e., the origin from which one can derive space, time, the categories, and the functions of judgment and thereby ensure that they are not merely brute facts about humans.4 He therefore seeks a first principle to render Kant's science of intelligibility truly rigourous. Moreover, in order to avoid both the pre-Kantian presupposition that experience conforms to the object and the Kantian presupposition that it conforms to the subject, Schelling aims to cognize this principle as the identity of subject and object, i.e., of thought and being. Throughout his career, Schelling defines this cognition as absolute knowledge and assigns it to intellectual intuition.

>> No.22047417 [View]
File: 496 KB, 1064x1064, 6BB3D4B5-3A8F-401A-AE33-2F8C9700ACC9.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22047417

>>22044545
Based and Naturphilosophie-pilled

>> No.20486765 [View]
File: 496 KB, 1064x1064, 4EE0618B-E023-419E-A136-B0920608B892.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20486765

Literally read Critique of Pure Reason, then into German Idealism. Thats the real theoretical framework behind magic. Also Neoplatonic works, Plotinus and Proclus. Also Classical Arabic works straight up develop theories of how magic works. Also learning german latin greek and arabic helps coz a lot of good shit is untranslated/untranslatable prolly for good reason (filter plebs and so on). Nobody said it would be easy. Also it could all theoretically be flawed in which case you will waste years of your life and come out a tired and bitter old man. Ok good luck.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]