/lit/ - Literature

>>19623454
Merry Christmas!

you already know the answer

>>19115606
based based based

>>19091972
>nooooo stop talking about philosophy!! only talk about the books I like!!
kys

What was the name of that mock title again which in the beginning of the 20th century was given to some obscure french writer? It was something like Prince of Literature.

I've been looking from time to time for two weeks now. Here is where I first read someone referencing it. Please don't ban or delete. Just tell me!

You already know the answer

Tell them about Hegel.

Jeez! this book has alotta big words.

Wowzers! I guess Nietzsche wasn't that bad after all huh.

If you think Schopy is good check out HEGEL. Wowzers!

Uhm yes, have you heard about HEGEL.
Whew!

I want to read Hegel but I don't want to further ruin my prose by reading thousands of pages of his horrendous writing.
What's the right move here?

Is it true Spinoza and HEGEL have a lot in common?

Asking for my friend ok so don't call me stupid.

Check out HEGEL. Wow!

>>18443238
>only a 4pl8 diddy
I raise you 5 and a 2pl8 OHP @86kg

>>18435491

Is the most succinct way to understand the Hegelian dialectic as the dialectical movement of an Idea? Naturally, the doesn't dollop the Fichtean triadic pattern; however, dialectical development is progressive through the sublation of contrasting positions and goes from less to more refined and comprehensive (i.e. from particular to universal truths) right?

>>18365888
This is part of the historical dialectic. We are at a moment of tension right now. Post-structuralism is the determinate negation of structuralism. But preceding movements as well as post-structuralism are going to be sublated into a higher formation of spirit.

>>15323445
I question rational spirituality, it places too much emphasis on the mind and thinking

Reminder that if you still didn't take the /scifitlit/ pill, you're never going to make it