/lit/ - Literature

analytic cope

>>20999919
Soiboi.

>>19942480
your "logical discussion" is literally just declaring a bunch of baseless rules

>>19816040
That's why linguistic philosophy and phenomenology developed though. Analytic philosophy wasn't an attempt to get over the problem, it was a retreat into English style empiricism and a vague preference for "clarity." Thankfully pragmatism kept enough people sane until Wittgenstein could come and deliver the death blow.

Even the thing analytics were rebelling against, the British idealism, wasn't that bad. Just a typical era of people expressing syncretic philosophical ideas within a mediocre framework (warmed over, hand me down Hegel).

>>19816050
I am just making some of the classics available for others who wish painful death on all an*lytics.

What do I read if I want to read something like continental philosophy but easy to read? No secondary sources please

Anglos ruin everything. All I wish was that I was born a German bull. My earliest memories are unironically of the love of trains.

Are there any analytic philosophers with soul? There has to be at least one.

>>15139385
You’re retarded

Are there any analytical philosophy books that actually go over fun topics? While continentals can't be understood 95% of the time they deal with the questions that are fun to write about. They talk about how to live, and write books about art and music and it's effect on our lives and how it relates to philosophy etc etc. Are there any analytical philosophers who do this or is it impossible to be analytical and write about stuff like that?

The pic I posted isn't supposed to be bait I just googled it and it's kinda talking about what I'm interested in.