/lit/ - Literature

>>23378701
Books form the thought that the upcoming leaders have. Without new books, new thought and new authors, the Right will never amount to anything. All we have is psy-ops and my-own-style-of-Christian-Liberalism.

>>23378776
Women will always be the most vocal supporters of any system, the second the wind changes and an authoritarian (anti-Jew) worldview emerges in their country, they will eventually come to support it more so than any of the most ardent core members.

Your problem is weak men allowed this. As an example, if the world suddenly permitted (or said nothing) about striking women for percieved slights in the same way that men can fight, the world would change in a heartbeat. The problem we have is men are unwilling to strike women and will in fact come to the defense of an abusive woman if a man defends himself.

That there is the essence of the problem.

>mfw the black jurors let him off as an act of revenge for how the police treated Rodney King, the drugged up shitnigger that nearly killed a dozen people while leading police through a high speed chase.

>>22980676
If it was irrelevant you would then mention in the same breath the need to fight it. Though again, not jewish, I bring up Islam as it is the greatest thread to the West, in both demographics and culture. It is the fasted growing in both converts and family size.

>>22980697
Kek.

Where can I buy George Lincoln Rockwell's books?

>>21697508
>Well no, jews, their practices, and their noses are all openly known, especially by the people who do commerce with them and explicitly seek them out because they do offer things that are prohibited.
Yes, that is why they historically forced to wear identification so people could easily be made aware the jew was before them. It is redundant to mark people whom you can immediately tell apart. Hence the Judenhut, the jewish hat, or the jewish yellow star which goes all the way back to Islamic Caliphates.

>People want rulers who represent their values and don't make their lives miserable
Those two things are completely exclusive, the later part is correct and the former is not. If you thought about it you do not want people who share your values as the values you have are typically utterly incomparable with those who must rule. Hence why the upper class cultivated behaviors and outlooks which were conductive to ruling. In the military I could not give an order which could consign hundreds of good men to their deaths. I could and did lead a section or a fire-team. These values are completely incompatible, a good Sergeant or Full-Screw makes a terrible Captain or Major. You would know this if you had been part of a functioning hierarchy, aside one who's only goal is to make money.

>The entirety of politics is something of a rebuttal to that... rather, if you're a European-centered white nationalist, you should know that a lot of Europe's history is spent warring with itself.
Families spent time fighting amongst themselves, that does not preclude it from being the same kin. Why is that difficult for you to understand that by removing one of the major sources of inter-communal conflict we do not completely solve the problem of inter-communal conflict. Because we can't remove all the toxins from a water source at once does not mean you do not remove toxins when you can. This is what progress is, long term solutions to problems. Not teaching children to twerk.

>Actual power is knowing all the ways you can achieve your aims alongside the ability to achieve them utterly.
No that is competence and forethought, that applies to you getting to work. You aren't powerful but you are competent and thought ahead. Read Schmitt for a better understanding of sovereignty and perceptions of power.

>>21697543
>This is why i think it is extremely important to break the Holocaust mythos.
I don't think you do anybody any favors for denying the holocaust or questioning it. Instead, what question you must ask is what behavior the jew conducted and to what extent that would foster such hatred against it. Was it the dozens of financial scandals that came to light after the closure of the first world war? Was it the continual agitation for Communism in a place where people did not wish it, lead almost exclusively by the jew? The holocaust happened, the reasons for it have been obfuscated.

>>21609124
>>21609133
Which is hilarious because they both have the same epistemological roots, as well as the same resolution. That only through they can apotheosis be achieved and all who refuse to embrace them are to be punished and refused a position in their paradise, which can only be made manifest via trial and hardship.

He became the very thing he tried so hard to prevent because he does not care about polarization. His only goal now is to prevent a nationalistic blood & soil movement arising organically in response to all the truly awful things happening in White countries.

The cherry on the cake though is the very thing he tried to stop happening that made him famous, mandatory language, has happened everywhere and progressed to the point where he no longer cares. Forget mandatory gender pronouns, we all know you will be fired for not using them in professional environments. What is worse is now we have child drag shows that he is suspiciously silent on and have now progressed to the point where his co-worker has made a documentary on what is woman.

Instead of trying to save his own people, his own nation, his own culture and his own heritage he has bowed down to Israel and the jewish interest in media, no doubt because he was told to do so by his new leash-holder, Shapiro.

>>21506843
>I think I was clear enough on this segregationist trash. It’s fear of too many others, too different looking others, etc.
It is not at all that they look different. It is that their virtues are disgusting to me, that their aesthetic is unpleasant to me. Their behavior is offensive to be around, how they establish their society and communities is the very opposite of what I celebrate and love, so much so that simply being in close proximity to these people is sufficient to incur damage in every arena, material, social, economic and more. These are the reasons, not your shit-wing take of them being different. Nobody worries about going to a neighborhood populated entirely by Japanese, or Finns, or Icelandics it entirely blacks, hispanics, indians and, arabs.

>move to directly democratic communities, suppress the authoritarian urges and things get more comfortable, stable and “ethnicities” coalesce
What on earth makes you think that direct democracy will fix anything? On the contrary it will harm more. The idea that because you have the majority on your side does not make a decision correct or right. People, especially non-European minorities can be easily encouraged to want anything that mass media tells them to, they are not capable of self-rule. The entire world has shown us this, that most people outside of Europe can not self-govern. Giving them a controlling stake in anything is suicide. You also completely misunderstand biology, as I've said before, good luck donating organs, plasma and more to your mixed race baby. Their is a crying shortage for plasma and similar vital fluids because blacks and hispanics do not donate, despite them being the majority in the world. Further, the mixing of two species only results in a benefit if the two copulating are of equal ability, otherwise it results in the loss of any heritage or pedigree the higher of the pair had. Well done, you are anti-progress.

>Pride of place and that small town feel will return.
No, no it will not. It can not. Though the real question is why should we destroy it in the first place? We have it, others do not. We do not need to destroy it, they need to build their own.

>Aristocracy is an unjustifiable authoritarian class and is automatically oppression. I don’t care what group they originate from.
People need leaders, communities and society need a caste of people with whom foresight, management and administration can be used to direct and steer a nation and people. This is called Statesmanship and it is a harder a trade to learn as any that came before it.

>Anarchism can be near utopian if you gave it a chance
You are correct here, Utopia originally meant and still means, the unreachable place or the place that can not be reached. Anarchism is utterly incapable of organization society, even if the foundations were correct, you are simply at the mercy of a polity that is not anarchistic. Further, you are simply at the mercy of big business.

>>21503763
>Weighted voting according to lifestyle, family size, perhaps something economic, and an ideological measure.

That is barely vertical, it still results in the same problems. Voting will gradually be opened to more and more people as it is in the elected officials best interest to do so. Democracy is a race to the bottom, every time.

>Historically, many countries did not accord by that. For a particularly complex example where there was also universal suffrage
How do you preclude voting blocs and parties from forming? Again, this results in the same problems that are present in all other democracies. Us vs them. The goal becomes not to serve the people, but beat the other team and look good doing it. Results no longer matter as focus changes to an elaborate PR game.

>Establish an absolute minarchy with the push for any growth of the role of government labeled treason and punishable by death. Governments only legitimate role is defense of personal property.
What a wild position you have. If the only job of government is the protection of human property, what is there to vote on? And what keeps big business in check from ruthless exploitation of the blood and soil of your nation? When big businesses get so much social and economic capital , they can easily exchange this for political capital in their own soil, which could be huge swathes of the nation.

I do not mean to be rude but this has not been thought out at all, it would be worse than what we have now. The idea that some form of Anarcho-Kiddie-Fiddlerism can resolve all the issues is just not true, I invite you to go live in the hood in any US city, that would be the most accurate representation of a minarchist society.

>>21494217
>you oversell the concept of family and you know it, because you added the clever caveat of "a family raised well", but what does that mean?
No, I correctly value the family. You undervalue it, perhaps because you do not have one. A family raised well is exactly what it means, one that is raised to a standard better than the others. Without abuse, without undue tragedy and pain. I placed that in there because dumb cunts like to say things like "WHAT ABOUT THE FAMILY THAT ABUSED THEIR KID?! HA CHECKMATE.".

>You have no control over your family, like you have no control over women.
You of course do have immense control on how your family grows. You also need no control of women if you select for traits and virtues you agree with. You have no control over how your garden grows but can easily foster a good environment from which beauty and joy can come from.

>All of this because I was too thirsty.
Thirsty implies pursing for physical attraction, note i do not say beauty as beauty is not skin deep. You chased the wrong woman and were burned, now you have a jaded world view of them. Understandable, but not indicative of a healthy mindset.

>You really spoke to the wrong individual here because I was ruined by pussy exactly in that way
It strikes me that you didn't, only absolute fucking dribblers would refer to women as a collective noun like pussy. Based on the words you're using and the response you gave me, I think you had a relationship that you thought was far greater than it was and were blind to the lackluster affection you were given in return. Again, select for beauty, values and virtues.

>ronically, women do not want family-oriented thinking, they want someone who's career-driven or hedonistic, or something else. That's what gets them to complain so much about the men they choose. It was a huge mistake. I got fucked exactly, specifically because I sought your idealized panacea.
They do, the women you see on tv, media, everywhere else are not indicative of the countless women all over the world who do want that. We are biological creatures, we want the same things we wanted when we left the cave. Because you had a terrible experience does not invalidate what I say. Because you had a bag steak from a sketchy restaurant does not mean all beef is poison.

They want somebody attractive, in decent shape and somewhat clean. They want somebody who can provide, little money and security and they normally want somebody who can lead and make difficult decisions. That is it. Your headcanon is just that, it is in your head.

>Honestly I don't want to be hostile to you but you really fucked up and it looks like you're projecting hard in a way that's very dissonant with how smart you're trying to sound.
I don't want to sound hostile either, but you are literally projecting your own terrible relationship on to an easily obtained situation. You are trying to smart when what I am saying is common knowledge and available anywhere.

>>21466599
>But is acceptance not love and ignorance not hate?

The sheer amount of anti-tolkien and anti-English authors posts suggests it is a coordinated efforts by kikes, niggers and other undesirables to consciously alter board culture and create further subversion of a much beloved childhood storyteller.

>>20975699
New World Spanish is not the same as classical Spanish as spoken in Europe. One is a disgusting parody of what it became, on the level of Ebonics to Oxford English.

>>20721247
>>20721253

>>20473152
>>20473267
>>20474382
>>20474427

Every. Single. Time.

>>20446433
It is difficult to work out if people are retarded online, if they act retarded and slam random words together i'm going to assume they're acting in bad faith or are an idiot.

>>20374767
Only one of your pejoratives is correct. Tiocfaidh ár lá.

>>20026212
>the sheer irony of defending that we need common cultural values after the left tore them to the ground and Jordan Peterson has been defending that we need to return to Christianity

You are quite clearly confused and have made gross assumptions. You can not encourage a group wide value system without some central force mandating it, kind words of encouragement do not provide motivation to return any standard value system. Hence why his work is now futile as he has nailed his flag quite firmly to God, when previously he was more Gnostic in his utterances.

Peterson hopes people will all individually come to the same conclusion and join him in his multicultural Christian future but without any centralized and mandated power. This does not happen. To get a large group to share values and beliefs there must be a unifying force with the goal of developing culture, this is true as far back as we know, from ancient Sparta and Rome to modern times.

>What you are trying to do amounts to no more than replacing one objective belief system with a worse objective belief system.
I disagree, Christianity, and all Abrahamic Creeds for that matter, are becoming little more than the religious arm of Globohomo. They should be rejected outright and a more nativist ethics replace it.

>>19955508
>Born and raised in London
>Been in and out of theater and hollywood all his life
>Went to the wildest parties and more when entering the scene
>Keeps naming them
>Without naming them
>Controlled opposition

He knows. He just can not say.

No value, quality or moral position survives in the face of violence against it. The West is unwilling to do so in the face of increasing hostility towards everything it once held dear. Unless we are willing to commit violence in defense of what we value, we never really believed in it.

>>19811171
Better than smoking cock.

>>19811203
But in every demographic that is not dominated by females, work shops, mechanics yards, the military, building sites and all manner of laborers can not tolerate to work alongside them.

That is not how philosophy is worked, friend. You cannot unlearn uncomfortable knowledge, racism appears a result of that.

Celebrate and embrace your people and culture.