/lit/ - Literature

>>19104385
>Do you not understand that the transcendental argument for God destroys all of your arguments?

>>18161455
Because the Orthodox Church takes spirituality seriously and dispenses with intellectual masturbation in favour of direct mystical experience of God.
(You are not invited to join btw.)

Does any religious text address the question of what to do if the evil/demonic forces ever win the final victory? Can be canonical (like the Bible) or theological/mystical (Summa Theologica/mystical writings etc) so long as there is a clear answer. Your answer can be about any religion.
To give an example of what I mean, in Hinduism during the Kali Yuga (dark age) your only religious duty is to speak the truth, but the doctrine of the ages presupposes the cyclical reappearance of a golden age at some point after that so this state of affairs isn't final. Germanic Paganism might be more interesting as an example, since it posits that during Ragnarok (the Twilight of the Gods), the forces of the Aesir gods are bolstered by every dead hero living in Valhalla, who then go on to fight one final battle against the forces of evil. What happens if they lose that battle though? What's there left for those people who wish to live a righteous life but find themselves in a world dominated and ordered by evil? What is their task and what is their duty?

>>16963328
Based Brahmin caste poster

yo whats up bros, protestant by birth here (unfortunately) wondering if its /lit/ to become a sedevacantist catholic? currently going to an orthodox church and like it but im not greek/russian/serbian/albanian so i feel a bit out of place.

btw how the fuck do i convert to catholicism if im going to be a sedevacantist? I feel like id have to lie at some point which im not about. Thanks.

Anyone else at a T14 law school? (or equivalent w/r/t your common law country)

Kind of a weird question, but this is obviously the best place to ask. I'd like to develop a more NRx-friendly version of FedSoc, for right-wingers with brains who might actually end up in positions of power.

If anyone expresses interest I'll drop a burner e-mail and we can talk. The goal is to get law & econ-oriented professors on board + the rare genuine social conservatives. It would be a secret society/informal reference network. If successful, this operation will probably be coordinated via listserv and largely self-governed local chapters. If we get enough momentum we could possibly create our own law journal (likely pseudonymous)