/lit/ - Literature

>>15752992
Enjoy your break, anon.

>>15679326
I do.

Proposition 53: Women cannot understand philosophy or any highbrow literature.
Demonstration: This is self-evident. To understand (Definition 6, part 3) philosophy or highbrow literature adequately requires significant intelligence (Proposition 52, part 5, with Scholium). In so far women (Definition 3 of the Sexes) lack this intellectual capacity (Axiom 6 of the Sexes), them understanding philosophy would be an absurdity. Therefor, women cannot understand philosophy, etc., Q.E.D.

>>15666550
What if I told you that Ethics is my favorite philosophical text?

>>15665280
Are you looking to have an actual mathematical understanding of the topics or are you just looking for algorithmic knowledge without the intuition behind the processes? If the former, you'll want to look into getting a book that goes over naive set theory and logic, and then you'll want to get an introductory book to analysis. If the latter, then there are several books that are largely computational book for any field (even ones such as abstract algebra). For me to actually recommend you anything, though, you'll need to be more specific by what it is you want to actually learn.

t. math major