/lit/ - Literature

>>18859555
>>18859581
Whatever weight we accord to that fact, we may be confident that it has been pouring a few drops of wormwood into our general enthusiasm. That is a fundamental violation of common law and demonstrates that I am deliberately using colorful language in this letter. I am deliberately using provocative phrases that I hope will stick in the minds of my readers. I do ensure, however, that my words are always appropriate and accurate and clearly explain how the stupidity of frogposters is utterly gung-ho about credentialism because it lacks more pressing soapbox issues.
To put it crudely, if society were a beer bottle—something, I believe, that the stupidity of frogposters holds in high regard—it would indeed be the nauseating bit at the bottom that only the homeless like to drink. I have a T-shirt emblazoned with the following inscription: “In the stupidity of frogposters’s line of business, you don’t need to know what you’re talking about.” I like to wear that T-shirt to make a point about how the stupidity of frogposters wants to impair the practice of democracy. This desire is implanted in a part of its brain that’s immune to reason or argument. Consequently, there’s no chance that we can get it to see that its hirelings are merely ciphers. The stupidity of frogposters is the one who decides whether or not to pollute the great canon of English literature with references to its disdainful obiter dicta. The stupidity of frogposters is the one who gives out the orders to quash other people’s opinions. And the stupidity of frogposters is the one trying to conceal how if the past foretells the future, we’re in sizable trouble. It has repeatedly tried in the past to weaken our mental and moral fiber, and I fully expect it to exert more and more control over other individuals in the not-too-distant future.
I don’t object to the stupidity of frogposters’s hit pieces because I still wish briefly to take a position on the question as to what extent the stupidity of frogposters’s declamations blend self-involved, capricious Marxism (manifested in a dour stance) with a purported support for environmentalism, trade unionism, and the dignity of labor