/lit/ - Literature

>>19497451
>General thread for discussing all LITERATURE related to the one, holy, Catholic and apostolic church. Post your current reads, recommendation requests, and literature questions here. Please keep all discussions limited to Catholic literature!

>>19136947
There is a reasonable probability that the quote is from Heisenberg. It was referenced by his protege Carl Friedrich von Weizsacker. Not all quotes are necessarily found in a written corpus - some are found in an oral tradition, such as from a teacher to a student.
>The standard theory of evolution is the position I've been defending this entire thread
And I do not contest that evolution by natural selection is likely the mechanism whereby complex life came to be AFTER the existence of the first life form. The discussion is regarding abiogenesis, BEFORE the existence of the first life form, not what happened subsequent to the first cell developing in an environment where it could reproduce and mutate.
>Your "shocking" refusal is just a retarded misunderstanding of statistics
Care to point out the misunderstanding, rather than make another baseless accusation?
>didn't feel like wasting time watching a retard screaming things are impossible and never specifying it further
How humble - he was named a Fellow of the Royal Society of Chemistry, and of the American Association for the Advancement of Science - awarded the Royal Society of Chemistry's Centenary Prize, inducted into the National Academy of Inventors, named "Scientist of the Year" by R&D Magazine. He won the ACS Nano Lectureship Award from the American Chemical Society, and was ranked one of the top 10 chemists in the world over the past decade by Reuters. He won the (((Feynman))) Prize in Nanotechnology, the NASA Space Act Award, the Arthur C. Cope Scholar Award from the American Chemical Society, was named the Small Times magazine's Innovator of the Year Award, the Southern Chemist of the Year Award from ACS, and the Honda Innovation Award in 2005 for his invention of Nanocars. He is one of the most cited and accomplished chemists on the entire planet who is alive today.

Yet he is the "retard", and you are the intelligent one. How prideful and arrogant does you have to be to make claims like this without being self-aware of how silly you sound?

>You can scream to death that naturalistic abiogenesis is impossible,
Again, that is not my position, nor Dr. Tours (as I have repeatedly pointed out) - the position is that there is no naturalistic theory of abiogenesis, and that despite that obvious and accepted fact, people like you still seethe upon hearing it. I am not making any claim of impossibility. At this point, I feel like you are just seething too hard to actually read what I am saying in my posts, as I don't really understand how you can keep missing the central part of my entire argument (and Dr. Tour's). That there is no naturalistic explanation for the origin of life is uncontroversial in the scientific community, and until you rebut that, I will have to assume you are literally too flustered to even let what I am saying pass through your reptile brain's danger filter, into your conscious mind.

>>19055422
>Catholics, who acknowledge the existence of supernatural beings and immaterial truths, are materialists