/lit/ - Literature

>>16139346
Only cope here is you, midwit. Dumb dumb went to the school of hard knocks. You learned to regurgitate useless drivel. He is more valuable to a society than you will ever be.

>>15849775

This is the true hierarchy OP

I'm sorry, you never even had a chance. My IQ is somewhere between 125-140 based upon a variety of achievement and cognitive tests from school. I never had a chance either. You need at least 145 IQ for access to serious power in America (elite level literature, science, etc). Anyone else is doomed to mediocrity and midwittery at best. You should have never come here, the realization of how small you really are in the grand scheme of things, how strict and cruel is our hierarchy, forget about it and imagine everything to be different. That is better for you

>>15701943

Picrelated is incredibly accurate of Jesse and his fans. Low IQ semi retards and geniuses are intelligent enough to understand how simple the truth fundamentally is, but midwits seethe at his seemingly inflammatory, but highly accurate generalizations.

>>15212819
Just a friendly reminder that passing entrance exams or getting a high enough SAT/ACT score in contemporary times is solely used for gatekeeping from poorfags.

If you were born into an influential family, you could score horribly and still get in no problem. F. Scott Fitzgerald literally got into Princeton Uni because he begged the then President of Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson to let him in since it was his birthday and Wilson accepted.

You only need pic related

The few intelligent individuals of /lit/ have noticed that midwits tend to misunderstand books. What are the true interpretations of books that you discovered? Here's mine for a start, don't try to disprove them, you would only show us that your IQ is midwit-tier
>In LOTR, The return of the king books doesn't refer to Aragorn, but Sam.
Sam is the king who returns
>Plato's Republic isn't about a real or even utopic state, it's a metaphor for the psyche.
>Stirner's The Ego and it's own is a fascist book
>Macchiavelli's The Prince is not satire. He believed in everything he wrote there, it's also a very useful book
>Samyutta Nikaya. Anatman means "not-self", it doesn't mean "non-self".

The /midwit's curse is not on himself, but on others. A midwit should see his pseud-ness for what it is, a treasured prize that allows him to be successful in society and be well-off under late capitalism, even the alienation or depression he may suffer is always one dimensional due to his filthy pseud mental capacity, this is unlike the alienation that can be felt by a genius

>>14962782
Truly pseud and /midwit tier.
Imagine having any engineering over mathematics.
Imagine placing philosophy with psychology and below bussiness managemnet.
Imagine placing applied mathematics with pure mathematics.
Yikes

>>14821554
You are 100% better off going to a worse uni and being the smartest person there, brown nosing with lecturers than you are going to the best uni you can. That's true for pretty much any subject.

Obsessing over top unis is for retarded 17 year olds.

>>14716944
this.
Adorno was right when he highlighted how the erasure of high culture and low culture just leads to mediocrity, as can be seen by the 20th century. Mass literacy was a mistake.

>>14713334
Here's a tip that makes midwits SEETHE. Play the lottery. Not only does it keep your delusional dreams alive but if you did win, it would change your life. The chances of winning over an lifetime are extremely small. Yet, as infinitesimally small as it is, you still have comparably infinitely better odds than not playing at all.

>>14709187
t. just world hypothesis midwit

>>14647714

Picrelated is why

>>14513593
"Low Brow" can be good too. Get off your dildo, midwit.

>>14509786
>bootlicker
You have to go back. This website isn't for NPC-tier cApItAlIsm bAd! dogma.

>>14455996
t. big boy that doesn't understand.
If I hit myself in the head with a hammer, I would become a MIDWIT, like YOU.

The 99.9 of double digit theists are better than 100-135 IQ midwits, because they at least listen to the ultra high IQ theologians and geniouses with IQs greater than 145.

>>14420350
Wrong version. 130 is still midwit territory.

assuming your brain is finished developing.

if not, then what does?

how intelligent do you have to be to into philosophy?

my iq is one standard deviation above normies at BEST. I just want to know if it will be a waste of effort with my peanut brain.

A /lit/ pearl of wisdom in image form

>>14368828
>ad populum arguments
>muh average intelligence
Average biases toward midwits. N G M I

/lit/ is too high IQ to fall for his trap. he only works on dummies

>>14238968
pretty sure he's a big boy -tier