/lit/ - Literature

>>15274409
I've been wanting to say this for a long time. Every time anti-natalism is brought up AN just bring up the same canned responses regurgitated to them by their mother bird Immendham. It's the same discussion time and time again and they never learn because their belief is not altogether logical, it is motivated and sustained by emotions. Motivated, perhaps by great suffering, but sustained by the reluctance to part with their victimhood, as victimhood is sometimes the only redeeming qualities some people have.

>>15274417
Why is it immoral? Do morals exist? What is your basis for morals existing? Evolution? Logic? These things are random, arbitrary. Morals are ever-changing and subjective, and not everyone believes in the most logically or evolutionarily supported morals.

>>15274443
And so the resident /lit/ Nietzscheans who, in other threads, I would've bitterly argued, come to our aid like the Rohirrim cavalry.

>>15152312
But there is no "you" during nonexistence, so nonexistence cannot be better. There might not even be a "you" if you get aborted or are miscarried.

>I don't give a fuck, it's a personal choice
Imagine if I argued with you in a different language.

>>15152349
And you don't have to be happy to be a natalist

>>15003725
Why should I want to be better equipped for dealing with life, dear anon?

>Because you will suffer less?

Why should I want to suffer less?

>Because...
A)
B)
C)
D)
...

You fill in the blanks, please.

>>14772052
>ywn smash her face in with a kiss

>Going to the library to drink coffee whilst revising my submission for KM D (KoModo Dragon?)

How are you spending your afternoon biz?