/lit/ - Literature

>>18441807
>>18443067
Was gonna say that looks pretty wholesome. OP is just a loser.

Do you have any idea how absurd that sounds? The only people who would actually believe this are the ones who have never had sex.
>penis head scoops out sperm
Ignoring the fact that, if there's already been enough time for you to fight off the other man and fuck the woman then the egg has likely already been fertilized, have you ever tried scooping something with your dick? It doesn't work that way.
>the pussy seals up after orgasming
This is just absurd. Anyone who has actually made a woman orgasm will know that they don't "seal up". The muscles tighten and they kind of spasm, sure, but within like 30 seconds it's back to normal and you keep fucking. Hell you could turn around and make them orgasm again if you wanted, as many times as you wanted, and still keep fucking.

Who would actually believe this nonsense?

>>18267530
The fact that this is all you took away from what he said proves his point. He didn't say anything about Christianity being older than Atheism and thus being more valid. He said the uneducated "hot takes" of 14 year olds (like yourself) are perpetuated by those unable to understand the deeper significance of Christianity to its adherents that one would expect from a widespread belief system that has been around for 2000 years. You can be completely secular and recognize that, yet you choose to regurgitate the same pseudo-intellectual criticisms from a point of ignorance.

King is a massive coomer, I struggle to read anything he writes because his characters just don't seem like real people when they start talking about how much some old woman likes to fuck. I don't think it's outlandish to say that King has some weird fixation on sex. With regards to It, isn't the explanation that by having a gangbang they cement their brotherly bond or some shit? Who even thinks like that?

bro just read a book

You write like an obese basement dweller from 2009. Be honest: Are you?

>>17987338
What kind of friend are you to let this happen? Do you not shit on R*ddit in front of them all the time?

Fantasy writers say too much and science fiction writers say too little. I'm not sure what's worse, 2 page meandering descriptions of a tree or a half-described futuristic gadget that I don't understand.