[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.22156910 [View]
File: 61 KB, 590x443, consciousness-709143.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22156910

Materialism fails to answer the hard problem of consciousness, pan/cosmopsychism is simpler and more intuitive. If consciousness is a fundamental aspect of the universe than the idea that a conscious entity perhaps designed said conscious universe isn't a gigantic leap. A conscious entity designing the universe can be logically explained by fine-tuning argument (so strong that even atheists start pondering). God is conscious, created the universe, became one with the universe, and now gives rise to consciousness in the universe.
Hard problem of consciousness? SOLVED!
Origin of the universe? SOLVED!
Destroys atheistcucks and theistfags? YUP!
Even sidesteps the problem of evil... BASED!

>> No.13031338 [View]
File: 61 KB, 590x443, you.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13031338

>>13031241

>His writing reek of something that which he does not himself possess, althought in any other case someone's writing reeking of that thing would be indicative of that person possessing that thing herself ; no I'm certainly not creating this useless distinction in order to reimburse the fact that I've contradicted myself in my very last post, a contradiction which only occured because the person I'm trying to critique is obviously too intelligent to handwave away with memes normally directed at who I think are /pol/ posters, so in order to do just that, handwaving away right wing thinkers without saying anything substantial, I have to basically say he's not intelligent, while also making it look like I'm not saying that at the same time, with this dogshit distinction.

>> No.13027968 [View]
File: 61 KB, 590x443, you.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13027968

>>13027941

>If I don't mention anything in particular I might trick him into thinking that I've read

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]