/lit/ - Literature

Im starting to think might DOES make right. After some thought I just realized we as people dont hate evil, we hate weakness. Tell me why society glorifies genocidal conquerors like genghis khan khan napoleon but hates pedophiles?

We hate pedophiles because theyre weak in their urges and cant control them, and we love murderers because theyre strong. We only hate murderers AFTER and IF they lose or submit to someone or something else like the court system or another commanding army.

We love characters like Joker and paul bateman depsite them being horrible people, why? Because they display strength in some form. Bateman is a guy with confidence and swagger and he sleeps with many women. Joker displays savgrey and charm and we love him for it.

We can never love or like a pedophile or liar because that displays cowardice, lack of discipline, and weakness. We love mass murderers though.

People HATE incels because theyrr whiney and weak but LOVE andrew tate because he's confident despite both having blatant mysognystic views.

I can go on but Ill just keep it brief. Thoughts?

What's the verdict?
Just anti clerical rants and lukewarm Nietscheism or actual insight and worth reading?

Post more books like this, please

Are there any other books that advocate the Social Darwinist point of view? The only one I know of is "Might is Right", pic related.

>>20514768
This is what you're looking for. The Satanic Bible does take many ideas from this book, but it warps them to fit a Redditor worldview. This book is what the philosophy of a Satanic Bible should be.

Anyone read it? Thoughts?
From what I can tell its basically 'Nietzsche for retards'

How to debunk this book in 1 second

>Might makes right! Heil hitler, nyehh!
>Ok, I'm bigger and stronger than you /pol/ chud and I say "Might doesn't make right."
>...That's not how you play the game you tranny! *cries and runs away*


Might makes right is easily refuted by the fact that if the mightiest claims might doesn't make right then it's illogical and not true.

>Bro, are you forging social contacts and get strenght in non-physical ways?! BRO THATS SOI AND CRINGE, LIFT SOME WEIGHTS SENPAI!
Literally gymcuck cope.

Is this basically empiricism?

>Nah bro, you can't just gain power by being social and being popular!? YOU GOTTA GET SWOLE NOW!
Hate this cope.

Was Redbeard, like Nietzsche (who he read), centuries ahead of his time? 100 years later literally billions of people cannot accept that "anti-racism" is impossible and see the truth right in front of them that all of life is war.

>>19203712

Holy shit this was fucking garbage.
>bitching about religion
>bitching about laws
Atheism, anarchism, and antisemitism: the novel. If you actually followed this guy's philosophy, you'd just end up delusional and on death row

>destroys all philosophy and religion
>"it IS personal, slave kid hehe"

have the ethnics departments ever recovered from this?

Do commoners have a right to kill their Elite?

>>16641360
rowling is based too. deal with it.

>Gifted this as a birthday present to my sister she won't talk to me now
Why cant women deal with a hard truth why must they live under shadows like cowards

*blocks your path*

This book reinvigorates the life force inside me.

>>14801181
Ragnar Redbeard

>Natural law makes no false judgments. Its decisions are true and just, even when dreadful. (Redbeard 4)
What makes them just?

>dude lmao just fucking kill, rape and steal cuz life is just a darwinian struggle for existance and all values are nothing more than brainwashing