[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:

View post   
>> No.10764635 [View]
File: 102 KB, 499x650, Do you think this is mere coincidence?.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10764635

>>10763955
Literally if you aren't Catholic or Orthodox, what are you doing?

>> No.10760457 [View]
File: 102 KB, 499x650, Do you think this is mere coincidence?.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10760457

>>10760396
>So Christian theology has to shove interpretations in the old testament that simply aren't there
holy moley this couldn't be more wrong

OT prefigures Christ and the NT. Christ is the fulfillment of the OT.

There's more typological connections like in
>pic related

>> No.10394009 [View]
File: 102 KB, 499x650, Do you think this is mere coincidence?.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10394009

Read the CCC. And it's called Typology, understanding the New Testament with an Old Testament context. An example is John The Baptist saying he is not worthy of loosening the sandal of Jesus. Why does he say this? Look to Deuteronomy 25.
>http://newtheologicalmovement.blogspot.com/2011/05/what-john-meant-when-he-said-i-am-not.html

The Old Testament is the prefigurement of Jesus Christ. And Both libraries of books are divinely inspired, so would all of these astounding connections in OT and NT be just coincidences? No, not at all. Also, what do you think the prophets did? They prophesied Jesus Christ.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]