[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.18723448 [View]
File: 698 KB, 1573x2014, home-library-6-1533675241.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18723448

How far away are you from completing your dream home library, /lit/? What books are you missing?

>> No.15265307 [View]
File: 698 KB, 1573x2014, 1587951305121.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15265307

Maybe I'm just stupid but I can't find a Romanticism chart on the wiki. Is there one?

>> No.15224856 [View]
File: 698 KB, 1573x2014, 1587951305121.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15224856

Was reading Thus Spoke Zarathustra, but I just can't. What is the best Gothic Horror novel? I'll read that instead.

>> No.15205738 [View]
File: 698 KB, 1573x2014, 1570057524192.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15205738

Whenever I'm having an argument with a moral relativist, they always bring up how moral truth is not related to objective truth (scientifically empirical truth).

They usually hold the idea that morals are subjective, i.e as long as a person thinks something is good, that's a justifiable belief to hold and act on such belief because the notion of good and evil is wholly subjective, and if you push them hard enough they will concede that morals are the product of power (Might Makes Right). But at the same time, they think it's fully rational to hold the belief that scientific truths are objective.

>> No.13924393 [View]
File: 698 KB, 1573x2014, home-library-6-1533675241.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13924393

Is this the best looking home library of all time?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]