/lit/ - Literature

>>17778545
You're strawmanning.

>>17765980

>>16607306
>It's an evil to have mercy on evil
I don't think it's wise to fight fire with fire, fight it with water. The best choice is maximum defense. Lest in the process of hunting monsters you too become a monster. And, who are we to judge another? We are all sinners. It is dangerous arrogance to think otherwise. When you love your enemies you distinguish yourself among humans because everybody, good or bad, love those who love them and hate those who harm/hate them, to love all is to transcend into the point of view of an immortal.

>>16596266
If you want to continue this transaction of ideas then adhere to pic.

My instincts tell me you think I am defending the zionist international cartel. I am not.

>that's not an underlying assumption to literally anything anyone has ever said. It's literally just a strawman

His argument is they're all the same at their core VS. mine which is that some say they are jewish but they have no clue what that means or demands.

>Okay? That has nothing to do with jewish power
It has everything to do with how he executed his plan which was the underlying central idea, the plan in theory vs the plans future interpretation - future slander (misconstructions).

>>4122486


stay retarded and worthless lozer : o)

ITT Times when the sheer ignorance of people astounded you
>dinner with extended family
>grandmother and I talking about literature
>guy across the table says to the guy next to him, "Animal Farm? That was Kurt Vonnegut, right?"

Look, I'm getting really tired of humoring you. You clearly don't know what you're talking about.

>>2494182
CISG 1980. Look it up, it supersedes the UCC in the USA, and it's an international agreement.

http://www.uncitral.org/uncitral/en/uncitral_texts/sale_goods/1980CISG.html

Without these, international trade would be at a crawl, and the US, Japan, and the EU could never have become economic powers to the scale they are now. Just because you don't want it to be true, doesn't make it so.

>>2494178
It's called implied consent:
http://law.jrank.org/pages/7507/Implied-Consent.html

You are talking about expressed consent.

If you use the site but bypass the EULA, you're still consenting to be legally bound by the rules of the site. It's like being searched when you go to a secured area of an airport: you don't expressly consent to the search, but you imply it by buying a ticket.

>>2494191
The EULA in every case is about defining the use of the software. I reiterate that you don't know a whole lot about contract law, so you had best stop making yourself look bad with poor arguments, and worse with ad-hominem attacks and name-calling.

Pic related, if you want to get past being a /b/tard at some point in your life, aim higher than the green band... not lower.

>>2411240
I bet you were just waiting to do that, so smart looking bro. Too bad this has a well defined set of rules, ones which dictators all eventually violated, therefore not a fallacy and you are an idiotic child who probably hasn't even read a word of marx. One more post that doesn't have actual arguments pertaining to politics and I'm out, kiddo.

>>1655702
y u mad tho?

Also, this pic might help you in future. After that last reply, you're somewhere near the bottom.

>>1432510
Derp.

http://amzn.com/w/IFFW9WV8K919


^____^

This thread is hilarious. Here, let me contribute.
Pay attention, ladies. You're hovering around the second, and at best third lower levels. We can all tell you're upset about this, as well you should be. Truth hurts. Women.