/lit/ - Literature

>>21003457
Refuted by Theodore John Kaczynski (Peace be upon him)

>>20943148
Unprogramm yourself

>>20877744
I can think of one

>>20036169

>>19714796
Industrial Society And Its Future

>Consider the hypothetical case of a man who can have anything he wants just by wishing for it. Such a man has power, but he will develop serious psychological problems. At first he will have a lot of fun, but by and by he will become acutely bored and demoralized. Eventually he may become clinically depressed. History shows that leisured aristocracies tend to become decadent. This is not true of fighting aristocracies that have to struggle to maintain their power. But leisured, secure aristocracies that have no need to exert themselves usually become bored, hedonistic and demoralized, even though they have power. This shows that power is not enough. One must have goals toward which to exercise one’s power.

>>19572630
Everything by Ted Kaczynski

This

>>18287862
Soren Kierkegaard
Arthur Schopenhauer
friedrich nietzsche (only if you get filtered by Arthur)
the bible
And pic related
Here's some places to start

The Industrial Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.

Based or cringe?

>>18214277
This book is about moving out and living on your own and you could say that author left old things behind but was sadly and unjustly forced back

>>18208774

>>18197479
If you read pic related you would know the problems with primitivism and why what you are talking about could not be a very tedpilled
>you need stampbooks not survival manual

>>18193956

>>18173234
For the larp yes
But it covers self-help, rhetoric, rights, ethics, behavior, etc
Its just models for things
Read it if something that hooks you

If you want to know ethical grounds for hating kikes and blacks you would read this
>Theozoology

What are your thoughts on this ?

ITT: Retarded bullshit you got memed into reading.
I can't believe I read this psycho retard and his insane book. Literally nothing in this book is valuable because it's ideas can't be implemented.

>warning people about technology?
al-Ghazali did it first.
>call for destruction of capitalist society to protect nature?
Islam did it first.
>prevent all forms of progress?
Islam did it first.

And this guy has the nerve to say that anarchism is the only solution? Clearly a worldwide Islamic caliphate is a way more realistic and pragmatic solution, not just for technology, but for all problems of the western decadence.

>inb4 fascism
Fascists are modernist technophiles.
>inb4 paganism
Paganism died and failed to protect its traditions. Modern paganism is LARP for a small group of people interested in metal music and fantasy games.

I've sent a letter to Ted, together with the Quran, Djellaba and a prayer rug and maybe he will convert, insh'Allah, and stop his delusional anarchist ideas that probably originated from mental trauma during his MK Ultra sessions.

>shitty ripoff of Dr. Seuss's The Lorax

I can't be the only one that absolutely agreed with all his views on technology, but cringed at the anarchism part. A way better solution would be Islam, because it's very traditionalist and more primitive. This would also stop the problem that if one country becomes anarchist and the other one wont - that you're vulnerable for conquest. If all countries were to follow the Islamic religion then you'd easily could prevent technological progress. I'm not a muslim, but I think this would be the perfect solution. Christianity could be the solution, but I feel like it's too liberal and modern for this to happen. Fascism has also been mentioned before, but fascism LOVES technology and I doubt it could be spread as well as a religion. What do you guys think the proper solution would be?