/lit/ - Literature

>>19764293
why is god so obsessed with my cooming? is he a pervert or something?

>>16717531
6 Then Judah took a wife for Er his firstborn, and her name was Tamar. 7 But Er, Judah’s firstborn, was wicked in the sight of the Lord, and the Lord killed him. 8 And Judah said to Onan, “Go in to your brother’s wife and marry her, and raise up an heir to your brother.” 9 But Onan knew that the heir would not be his; and it came to pass, when he went in to his brother’s wife, that he emitted on the ground, lest he should give an heir to his brother. 10 And the thing which he did displeased the Lord; therefore He killed him also.

>>16401975
So now the problem becomes Jesus, the psychotic killer with the split personality who calls himself his own father and his own son.
Not a loving god. A sick weirdo. If this god were true, we’d all be in trouble, not just “sinners”

Privation is also misuse.
Plotinus argued however that demons, as in truly evil spirits, can't exist because evil inclination is always inclination into body, as in soul fragmentation. You can't be spirit/immaterial and evil. Any superficially evil daemon is merely enacting just punishment, which might only seems unjustified to us.
Thus demon possession is an ontological impossibility for Plotinus.
Later Platonists are more iffy since Damascius describes an exorcism. Perhaps one could reason that if a person indulges in a vice (which is a thread pulling on the soul, in a way a little will of its own) that this thread becomes heavier and heavier until it manifests physically as some sickness and separate will.
But still this "our demons", which we brought upon ourselves, feeding an inclination until it dominates our will—not some external spirit.
This is related to soul fragmentation, when our parts start having perspectives of their own, while we remain as a meta subject. Schizophrenia is then total fragmentation.

Prior to the true beings and to the universal principles there is the one god, prior cause even of the first god and king, remaining unmoved in the singularity of his own unity. For no object of intellection is linked to him, nor anything else. He is established as a paradigm for the self-fathering, self-generating and only-fathered God who is true Good; for it is something greater, and primary, and fount of all things, and basic root of all the first objects of intellection, which are the forms. From this One there has autonomously shone forth the self-sufficient god, for which reason he is termed “father of himself” and “principle of himself”; for he is first principle and god of gods, a monad springing from the One, pre-essential and first principle of essence. For from him springs essentiality and essence, for which reason he is termed “father of essence”; he himself is pre-essential being, the first principle of the intelligible realm, for which reason he is termed “principle of intellection.

>>15801016
>There was no such a thing as faith in Rome, lol. Their gods were greek gods rehashed, which in turn emerged from egyptian mysteries. Romans and Greeks had the most unoriginal theogonies.
>i have no words to describe to which lengths they went to subvert ancient polytheist communities.
>This is just ridiculously subversive and my trust in the church has fallen even more than before

>>15730134
If God is real, the Christian God isn't.
Is this logically sound and a perfect display of an omniscient intellect?

>>14573196
>how the fuck can you believe in all that shit but not god

True Authorship of the New Testament
http://sidneyrigdon.com/vern/Reuchlin.htm

https://www.globalgreyebooks.com/occult-theocrasy-ebook.html

>>14539678

>>14072800
>What is a definitive argument against the existence of God?
http://sidneyrigdon.com/vern/Reuchlin.htm
I. THE GREAT SECRET -- "FOR THERE IS NOTHING COVERED THAT WILL NOT BE REVEALED" (Mat. 10.26)

The New Testament, the Church, and Christianity, were all the creation of the Calpurnius Piso (pronounced Peso) 1 family, who were Roman aristocrats. The New Testament and all the characters in it -- Jesus, all the Josephs, all the Marys all the disciples, apostles, Paul, and John the Baptist -- are all fictional. The Pisos created the story and the characters; they tied the story into a specific time and place in history; and they connected it with some peripheral actual people, such as the Herods, Gamaliel, the Roman procurators, etc. But Jesus and everyone involved with him were created (that is, fictional!) characters.

Repeatedly, religious-minded Judaean zealots were staging insurrections against the Herodian rulers of Judaea who were Piso's wife's relations. Piso wished to strengthen his wife's family's control of the Judaeans.

The Pisos searched for a solution to the two problems. They found it in the Jewish holy books, which were the foundation both for the rapid spread of the religion and for the zealots' refusal to be governed by Rome's puppets. The Pisos mocked, but marveled at, the Jewish belief in their holy books. Therefore, they felt a new "Jewish" book would be the ideal method to pacify the Judaeans and strengthen their inlaws' control of the country.

About the year 60 A.D., Lucius Calpurnius Piso composed Ur Marcus, the first version of the Gospel of Mark, which no longer exists. He was encouraged by his friend Seneca 5a and assisted by his wife's kinsman, young Persius the poet.


The Jesus figure which Piso creates is a composite. He inserts redrawn elements from Joseph in Egypt and other Jews of the Bible; elements from Essenic writings; and characteristics of various pagan gods.

>>14048428
http://sidneyrigdon.com/vern/Reuchlin.htm
I. THE GREAT SECRET -- "FOR THERE IS NOTHING COVERED THAT WILL NOT BE REVEALED" (Mat. 10.26)

The New Testament, the Church, and Christianity, were all the creation of the Calpurnius Piso (pronounced Peso) 1 family, who were Roman aristocrats. The New Testament and all the characters in it -- Jesus, all the Josephs, all the Marys all the disciples, apostles, Paul, and John the Baptist -- are all fictional. The Pisos created the story and the characters; they tied the story into a specific time and place in history; and they connected it with some peripheral actual people, such as the Herods, Gamaliel, the Roman procurators, etc. But Jesus and everyone involved with him were created (that is, fictional!) characters.

Repeatedly, religious-minded Judaean zealots were staging insurrections against the Herodian rulers of Judaea who were Piso's wife's relations. Piso wished to strengthen his wife's family's control of the Judaeans.

The Pisos searched for a solution to the two problems. They found it in the Jewish holy books, which were the foundation both for the rapid spread of the religion and for the zealots' refusal to be governed by Rome's puppets. The Pisos mocked, but marveled at, the Jewish belief in their holy books. Therefore, they felt a new "Jewish" book would be the ideal method to pacify the Judaeans and strengthen their inlaws' control of the country.

About the year 60 A.D., Lucius Calpurnius Piso composed Ur Marcus, the first version of the Gospel of Mark, which no longer exists. He was encouraged by his friend Seneca 5a and assisted by his wife's kinsman, young Persius the poet.


The Jesus figure which Piso creates is a composite. He inserts redrawn elements from Joseph in Egypt and other Jews of the Bible; elements from Essenic writings; and characteristics of various pagan gods.

>>14047514
"Existentialism is a Humanism" and pic related, so that you do not need to read him.

>>14047255
>wasting your time reading---not even fairy tales, but---literal propaganda
http://sidneyrigdon.com/vern/Reuchlin.htm

>>14038797
http://sidneyrigdon.com/vern/Reuchlin.htm
I. THE GREAT SECRET -- "FOR THERE IS NOTHING COVERED THAT WILL NOT BE REVEALED" (Mat. 10.26)

The New Testament, the Church, and Christianity, were all the creation of the Calpurnius Piso (pronounced Peso) 1 family, who were Roman aristocrats. The New Testament and all the characters in it -- Jesus, all the Josephs, all the Marys all the disciples, apostles, Paul, and John the Baptist -- are all fictional. The Pisos created the story and the characters; they tied the story into a specific time and place in history; and they connected it with some peripheral actual people, such as the Herods, Gamaliel, the Roman procurators, etc. But Jesus and everyone involved with him were created (that is, fictional!) characters.

Repeatedly, religious-minded Judaean zealots were staging insurrections against the Herodian rulers of Judaea who were Piso's wife's relations. Piso wished to strengthen his wife's family's control of the Judaeans.

The Pisos searched for a solution to the two problems. They found it in the Jewish holy books, which were the foundation both for the rapid spread of the religion and for the zealots' refusal to be governed by Rome's puppets. The Pisos mocked, but marveled at, the Jewish belief in their holy books. Therefore, they felt a new "Jewish" book would be the ideal method to pacify the Judaeans and strengthen their inlaws' control of the country.

About the year 60 A.D., Lucius Calpurnius Piso composed Ur Marcus, the first version of the Gospel of Mark, which no longer exists. He was encouraged by his friend Seneca 5a and assisted by his wife's kinsman, young Persius the poet.


The Jesus figure which Piso creates is a composite. He inserts redrawn elements from Joseph in Egypt and other Jews of the Bible; elements from Essenic writings; and characteristics of various pagan gods.

>>14038658
>>>/his/
>>>/pol/
"True Authorship of the New Testament"
http://sidneyrigdon.com/vern/Reuchlin.htm